New book chapter: "How to Weigh a Cell."
This chapter explains how scientists have weighed cells throughout history, often using simple equipment and back-of-the-envelope calculations.
It has lots of interactives, so you can "repeat" the experiments directly in your browser.
This feels so adversarial. Better option IMHO is to allow agents but do one of:
- Have higher standards, see e.g. the CMU databases comp
- Make grade contingent on a 5 min verbal defense
- Allow custom agent that ships logs back for grading
Just found out that Berkeley course staff are writing hooks inside course repos so if a student opens an assignment in Claude Code or Cursor the agent will automatically ping the staff π΅βπ« well played
@vboykis Honestly the thing I keep going back to is that the best engineers do some of their best work in a hammock (or a Google doc). If I focus on the big picture more than daily "productivity" I tend to let myself use agents to build insight rather than just features
@jbmilgrom Yeah that makes sense too. I think it may come down to how much you can plan a priori. If you have a have a good map of the territory you probably want longer autonomous execution, whereas I often find I need to refine the map as I explore
@odysseus0z Yes but not because of more visual explanations... It's because I can ask it to challenge me to implement the paper, giving me enough scaffolding/hints etc to keep me in the zone of proximal development
Pretty crazy that I first learned to code by reading GORILLA.BAS (many years before Google, StackOverflow etc) whereas now when I want to learn something new I can ask an AI to build me custom progressive challenges
@tszzl Do you not think that AI research is mostly about having good, novel ideas? The legible technical skills amenable to RLVR seem to be a minor part of the job, no?
@turbochardo Students are active! I'm taking a bit of a pause from new videos while I figure out if I want the next series to involve more agent-based coding. There's a lot of good existing content though!
Yes! In addition:
- Schools have barely changed in response to computers and the internet, so will do a poor job with AI
- Focus is entirely on highly legible versions of "subjects" (math, english etc) when there is more value in what is in the gaps
- There is basically no attempt to develop what is important (self understanding, virtue, appreciation of how the world is built etc)
- The grade based school system keeps siblings unnaturally separated from one another (let alone their parents)
- In many school districts, it's hard to pull kids out for long stretches for travel etc