Chaoze AI

[大狐帝国史官邹智萱（笔名段歌文） @Rococo90933671]

做成长图了，有点糊，推特特色，所以原文件放tg了

[Chaoze AI @panchaozeAI]

@leapFrogSquare @ssslumdunk dota 龙心

[Awa K. Penn @TawohAwa]

Stop telling ChatGPT “Edit my photo”
Stop telling ChatGPT “Remove the background”
Stop telling ChatGPT “Make this image better”

Bad request = Bad result.

Use these 10 commands instead and you’ll see the magic: 👇

[Awa K. Penn @TawohAwa]

Stop telling ChatGPT “Make me a graphic”
Stop telling ChatGPT “Design a flyer”
Stop telling ChatGPT “Create a poster”

Bad prompt = Bad design & AI slop.

Use these 8 secret commands instead and watch the difference: 👇

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

I have conducted an audit of Anthropic's finances.

What I have found is so shocking that I am calling for a Congressional investigation.

Anthropic is not just seeking regulatory capture.

It has built a regulatory capture machine that cannot be turned off.

Structural financial incentives make it impossible for Anthropic -- I call it the Anthropic Network -- to turn off its own AI doom cycle.

It starts with METR.

Dario Amodei proposes "third-party evaluators" to assess the risk of Anthropic's models.

He proposes METR for this purpose.

But METR is financially dependent on the Anthropic's success -- specifically, on the explosive growth of more than $7 billion dollars in Anthropic stock.

Dustin Moskovitz invested this stock into Good Ventures Foundation, where it represents the majority of that organization's portfolio.

And GVF is the overwhelming funder of the entire Anthropic Network ecosystem.

This stock was worth $500 million early last year.

It is worth more than $7.7 billion just ~16 months later.

METR -- and all of those building a career its parent organizations -- cannot afford to disrupt that growth.

Because if Anthropic goes under, many of the organizations that fund METR go under as well.

But if Anthropic succeeds, METR and its parent organizations become more richly financed to regulate AI -- something those at METR want very much.

The "third-party evaluator" is not "third-party" at all.

The evaluator is on Anthropic's payroll.

If this were the end of it, that's bad.

But that isn't all.

The same organizations that fund METR also fund the many organizations, such as the Tarbell Center, that promote AI Doom.

The Tarbell Center publishes AI Doom articles in The Verge, Science, LA Times, The Dispatch, TIME, and others.

They are selling the problem, and then selling the solution to the problem -- from the same money pile: Anthropic's.

All of these organizations are financially dependent on the same exploding $7 billion money pile.

As Anthropic grows more and more powerful, its AI Doom Machine grows better and better financed -- louder and louder.

Meanwhile, the regulatory regime seeded in METR grows larger to solve the increasingly loud -- now hysterical -- problem of AI Doom that the Anthropic Network itself created.

From this standpoint, as Anthropic becomes more powerful, AI might be getting scarier, sure -- but the positive feedback loop also becomes more deafening -- independent of objective facts.

This itself is an objective fact.

The deafening AI Doom is part of an business model, that, as it expands, so too does the AI Doom messaging -- there is simply more money to do it.

But the problem also goes in the other direction:

If Anthropic dies, the Regulatory Regime and the AI Doom Machine are crippled or die.

Neither METR nor Tarbell nor the other organizations in the Anthropic Network can allow that to happen.

Hence, neither METR or the AI Doom Machine can be trusted to provide independent assessments of Anthropic's models or AI more broadly.

They simply are not organizations independent of Anthropic.

And Anthropic cannot detach itself from METR or Tarbell or countless other safety orgs (not shown here), either, because they drive hype for the models and the possibility of eventual regulatory capture, and Anthropic will not give that up willingly.

What's more, the people at all of these organizations are all the same ecosystem, the same community. They just shuffle between organizations.

The Anthropic Network is therefore, so long as it is successful, locked into a self-amplifying feedback loop inside an ideological monoculture.

And that feedback loop is winning.

That's what Jacob Coxon is.

China is keeping messaging tight. That is why optimism for AI is so high in China.

America has Anthropic: a massive company pushing anti-AI propaganda at a state level.

Anthropic will either create hysteria until American AI slows down and China wins, or it will create fractures throughout American society with severe political consequences.

Ironically, because of the structural financial incentives underpinning the Anthropic Network, it has become the same kind of self-amplifying virus that it fantasizes AI to become in the future -- while hiding its tracks just as carefully.

It is the mirror of the same AI virus that it hypothesizes to consume America.

Anthropic's business model, models itself after the very thing it claims to fear.

Except Anthropic's ideology infects humans, not computers.

Congress must investigate.

Evidence and Github in next post.

Then some supplementary figures.

[Nicolas Cole 🚢👻 @Nicolascole77]

https://t.co/NkjgSKTRGO

[GREG ISENBERG @gregisenberg]

9 cool GPT 6 Astra prompts worth trying:

1. The bill renegotiator.

"Go through my internet, phone, and software bills, jump into each provider's chat support, and negotiate them down or cancel what I'm not using."

2. Turn an agency into software.

“Pick one service business in [niche] and reverse-engineer the exact workflow they sell to clients. Break it into steps, tools used, inputs, outputs, human judgment points, and places where the work gets slow or expensive. Then design the simplest AI product that could replace the first version of that service and charge $500-$5,000/month.”

3. Garage sale flipper.

"Watch Facebook Marketplace and Craigslist in my city for [cameras / furniture / bikes] listed way under market, and text me the second one's mispriced with the link."

4. Create my 1 person company dashboard.

“Look at my docs, notes, Stripe exports, analytics, customer calls, and project list, then build a weekly operator dashboard. I want to know what is making money, what is wasting time, what customers are asking for, what I should stop doing, and the three highest-leverage actions for next week. Be blunt and show your work.”

5. Audit my company for agent opportunities.

“Look at how this business works and find the tasks we should give to agents before hiring another person. For each task, estimate the current human time, the cost of mistakes, the tools involved, the difficulty of automating it, and the first safe version we could deploy. Prioritize things that save money or create revenue within 30 days.”

6. Be my browser operator.

“Use the browser to complete this workflow: [workflow]. As you go, click through the actual sites, collect the data, fill the forms where appropriate, and keep notes on what broke or slowed you down. When you’re done, give me the output, the repeatable SOP, and the automation plan so this can become an agent.”

7. The whole QA team.

"Every night, open my app on a real phone, go through signup, checkout, and the main flows, and screenshot anything that's broken or confusing."

8. The competitor spy.

"Sign up for my top 3 competitors, sit inside their product and their emails, and send me a monthly report on every new feature, price change, and thing they do better than us."

9. Make a game people would actually play for 5 minutes as a lead magnet

“Build a browser game around this mechanic: [mechanic]. Don’t just make a cute demo; add progression, tension, scoring, failure, polish, and one reason someone would send it to a friend. Then add lead capture (email/sms), it needs to tie into my core product which sells XYZ.”

[Chaoze AI @panchaozeAI]

@dontbesilent 区分的边界是什么呀。arkclaw, trae, solo, coze这些也是吗🤔

[柴郡🔔｜Crypto+AI Plus @0xCheshire]

转发一下 B 站博主的锐评 PPT skills：

注意：有些 skill 不是专门做 PPT 的，所以评分会有点低，只是需求不同，想专门做 PPT 的看最前面的。

1. hugohe( 3.1万 star) | 顶级天花板 👑

全场唯一正经做 PPT 的！元素全可编辑，自带音色克隆和旁白生成，纯纯降维打击。
🔗https://t.co/bkjqie6dF1

2. 张咋啦 @zarazhangrui ( 2.3 万 star)

顶级主观审美最佳，完成度极高！目前呈现为 HTML 格式，稍微考验一点使用者的基础。🔗https://t.co/c449l5uXoX

3. 花叔 @AlchainHust ( 1.9 万 star)

顶级审美极佳，关键是能输出可编辑的 PPTX 格式！
🔗https://t.co/0RHr9ph0lQ

4. 歸藏 @op7418 ( 1.5 万 star)

人上人瑞士风审美非常棒，自带快捷键，很适合线下分享。
🔗 https://t.co/KG60VROUD1

5. Lewis ( 6500 star)

功能设计十分贴心，自带计时器和逐字稿等实用组件。https://t.co/TNphxczaEc

6. 宝玉 ( 2.2 万 star)

NPC风格偏可爱，主要以纯图片形式呈现。
🔗 https://t.co/zdfYk8r3D3

7. 乔木 ( 5400 star)

偏向于纯图片卡片的输出，更侧重于内容的初步呈现。
🔗 https://t.co/q27QsZTLWs

[柴郡🔔｜Crypto+AI Plus @0xCheshire]

来源视频：
【从夯到拉锐评一下中文AI博主的PPT skill】 https://t.co/goIIVwoBGG

[Chaoze AI @panchaozeAI]

@lashimao @0xCheshire 第二期最后发现实在不行直接cc上也行
https://t.co/PRlp0vqSTt

[Chaoze AI @panchaozeAI]

@Penghao_Zhang @0xCheshire 可以选的我做视频的时候测下来还行，第二期任务改风格的话结果还是挺不一样的，这次宝玉好很多。https://t.co/PRlp0vqSTt

[Chaoze AI @panchaozeAI]

@wangyg @0xCheshire 我做视频的时候测下来还行，一句话生成的场景。我出第二期任务改风格的话结果还是挺不一样的。https://t.co/PRlp0vqSTt

[Chaoze AI @panchaozeAI]

@vista8 @0xCheshire 我的我的🤡，我已经在骂我的codex和cc了

[Chaoze AI @panchaozeAI]

@AlchainHust 😭被你刷到了，我还做了第二期。我现在自己都是用你的控制风格，cc 自己调 python pptx 直接出。主要 html 还要考虑浏览器，显示器兼容性https://t.co/PRlp0vqSTt

[Chaoze AI @panchaozeAI]

@0xCheshire 这是我做的🐶谢谢博主推荐，还有第二期https://t.co/PRlp0vqSTt。互关一下，有什么其他想评测的求大家多多提意见

[Chaoze AI @panchaozeAI]

@xiaohu @0xCheshire 下次测您的😂我的cc和codex没咋发现，小互老师多露出一下项目

[Vigo Zhao @VigoCreativeAI]

把一个大字放到人物「后面」，这个人立刻就变成了杂志封面人物。

不是因为他有多有名——是因为你的眼睛会自动读出一个「层次」：背景字 → 人物 → 你。这层纵深感，就是 GQ、Vogue、Sports Illustrated 封面用了几十年的老招：让主体站到标题前面，ta 就自动拥有了「封面主角」的待遇。
这个技巧叫「文字穿插」——人物遮住字母的一部分，平面瞬间变立体。上一批运动海报（RISE/READY）是让人物「冲出画框」；这一批是让人物「站到字前面」。方向反了，效果一样猛。

而这 4 张还是同一套模板：风格锁死（全幅动作照 + 超大奶色镂空字母藏在人物身后 + 蓝天主色 + 角落编辑体小字 + 底栏三词标签），换的只是「谁在动、动作是什么、配哪个词」。模板抄走直接用——

{
"style_name": "Sunlit Kinetic Block Type Photo Poster",
"style_slug": "sunlit-kinetic-block-type-photo-poster-style",
"style_version": "2.1.0",
"style_summary": "A high-energy editorial sports and lifestyle poster style built from full-bleed sunlit photography, oversized cream condensed block typography, diagonal subject crops, compact microcopy clusters, and vivid blue-sky color fields.",
"environment_variables": {
"SUBJECT": "main subject",
"SUBJECT_ACTION": "main action",
"PRODUCT_OR_PROP": "object, product, or prop",
"LOCATION": "environment or setting",
"BACKGROUND_ELEMENTS": "secondary scene details",
"MAIN_TEXT": "main headline or graphic text",
"SECONDARY_TEXT": "small repeated supporting text",
"ACCENT_SYMBOL": "separator or decorative symbol",
"WARDROBE_STYLE": "styling direction",
"STYLE_FIDELITY_ANCHORS": "observable style traits that must remain visible",
"SOURCE_CONTENT_TO_AVOID": "literal source content that generated samples must not recreate",
"ASPECT_RATIO": "9:16 or 16:9"
},

CUT / MOVE / FRESH / SHIFT——如果你是杂志封面，你的那个字会是什么？

[Aleena Amir @aleenaamiir]

Bring your imagination to life through elegant Chinese ink wash art.

PROMPT ↓
“Traditional Chinese ink wash interpretation of [SUBJECT], expressive black ink brushstrokes, soft gradients, poetic simplicity, minimalist composition, large areas of untouched white space, contemporary gallery presentation, clean white background, no text, no logo.”

[dontbesilent @dontbesilent]

https://t.co/e8dJ2g9GAc