🚨 Starmer is about to ban under 16s from social media. And the establishment is already pushing to extend it to under 18s.
They want you to believe this is about protecting children. It is not. To enforce an age limit on social media every single user in Britain will be forced to upload their passport to a government approved database just to prove they are allowed to speak online.
They are not building a child safety net. They are building a national ID database through the back door and using your children as the excuse to do it.
First they arrested people for tweets. Then they monitored legal posts. Now they want your passport before you are allowed to have an opinion. RT if you see exactly what they are building. 🇬🇧
@Keir_Starmer@LondonMum2025 You’re importing foreign perverts by the boatload who gawp at children in school playgrounds and try to meet up with underage girls to touch them up.
You don’t give a shiny shite about our children, it’s all about controlling the narrative to push your Marxist agenda.
Resign.
Why are political leaders talking as if this is an isolated incident that is being "exploited" by the "far-right" and "pointless rioting" instead of the final fucking straw of anti-white ideology causing the dehumanisation and death of British people?
> The security guard at the Manchester Arena didn't stop the suicide bomber because he was afraid of being called racist. The bomber killed 22 people and injured over 1,000.
> Valdo Calocane was released because authorities feared they would be called "racist" due to the overrepresentation of young black men in mental health detention. He went on to kill 3 people.
> A head teacher who raised concerns about Axel Rudakubana's "very high risk" to others was accused of "racial stereotyping" by authorities. Rudakubana went on to kill 3 young girls and wound 10 others.
> Pakistani Muslim child rape gangs were allowed to operate across Britain, targeting thousands of white and Sikh girls, partly because authorities were afraid of being called racist if they interfered.
Brits have a tremendous capacity to absorb horrors against their own people, but there are only so many times you can order us to "don't look back in anger".
By ignoring people's concerns every time they're expressed democratically and peacefully, the establishment has driven people to engage in direct action. It's dangerous and undemocratic of the government to have done this. And doubly dangerous to give people examples such as Ballymena to follow if people want their concerns to be dealt with.
@tanishabramwell fyi shes an interesting 1 went from being a skint single mother to making enough money on only fans 2 buy several houses which i believe she rents back out to women that were in the same position as she was in . she used to b all over tic tok turning negatives into positives
@FeelLoun@liammackenzieuk@sophielouisecc you can still get done with carrying an offensive weapon . its still a knife at the end of the day and your no going to get away with telling police your a carpet fitter