L'UE a répondu à Numerama sur le blocage de Siri AI en Europe, déploré par Apple.
L'UE confirme en creux la version d'Apple : elle affirme qu'elle n'a pas interdit Siri AI, mais dit aussi que Siri AI n'est pas possible « dans ces conditions ». Et c'est là que ça se corse.
Ça parle beaucoup du future code legacy écrit par l’IA à maintenir qui sois disant sera horrible
Par contre tout le code Legacy 100% écrit par des ingénieurs informaticiens qualifiés qu’on se tape tous les jours ça passe crème 😁
Nouvelle cyberattaque majeure en France : l'Éducation nationale victime d'un vol de données.
Prénom, nom, établissement, classe, identifiant ÉduConnect… Les données des élèves ont fuité.
Le nombre de victimes est pour l'instant inconnu.
https://t.co/Q0cKRKPlgL
@dr_l_alexandre auditionné hier devant la Mission d'information sur l'IA: "il faut sortir du déni et arrêter d'écouter Luc Julia" ; "Claude Opus est bcp plus intelligent que moi, il m'écrabouille en médecine" ; "il y a vraiment le feu au lac et notre réflexion est bcp trop lente"
🚨 Do you understand what this man just pulled off..
> a guy from North Carolina used AI to generate hundreds of thousands of songs.. uploaded them to Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon.. then botted billions of streams on his own tracks and walked away with $8 million
> 660,000 fake streams per day.. spread across thousands of AI songs so nobody noticed.. $1.2 million a year.. for music no human ever actually listened to
real artists are out here grinding for 0.003 cents per stream.. promoting on TikTok.. begging for playlist placements.. and this guy just had AI make the music AND the audience
first-ever criminal streaming fraud case.. he's paying back $8 million.. but the playbook is out there now.. and AI just got better since he started
the music industry spent 10 years fighting piracy.. now they have to fight songs that don't exist being listened to by people who don't exist.
Take your card number and starting from the second-to-last digit, double every second digit moving left. If doubling a digit produces a number greater than nine, subtract nine from the result. Then add all the digits together, the doubled ones and the untouched ones. If the total is divisible by ten, the number is valid. If it isn’t, the number is mathematically impossible as a card number and the form rejects it on the spot.
This is the Luhn algorithm written in 1954 by a computer scientist at IBM named Hans Peter Luhn. It still runs inside every payment form on the internet today. And it turns out that valid card numbers are not random. They follow this mathematical rule, and any number that breaks it is immediately disqualified without ever touching a bank’s systems. No server contacted. No database checked. No network request made. The validation happens entirely on your device, in milliseconds.
The first six digits do additional work before the Luhn check even runs. They are called the Issuer Identification Number; the first digit identifies the card network (4 means Visa, 5 means Mastercard, 3 means Amex), and the following digits identify the specific bank that issued the card. This is why payment forms show you the Visa or Mastercard logo the moment you type the first digit. No server needed. The network is encoded in the number itself.
The last digit of every card number is called the check digit it exists for no other purpose than to make the entire number pass the Luhn algorithm. When a bank generates a new card number, it calculates what the last digit must be to make the sequence valid, then stamps it on the card. It is a built-in mathematical fingerprint.