Ah, so you’re a PSG fan defending City’s argument about state-backed ownership and financial rules? 😂 That makes this even better. You’re literally supporting a Qatar-backed club while lecturing others about the system. The irony in your username was the least ironic thing about this exchange. 😭
And no, I wasn’t implying you’re a Liverpool fan. I was laughing at the fact that a PSG fan is defending City on this particular issue. 🥴
Buddy, I said I can afford the subscription, not that I’m starting a Twitter career 😂 You literally counted my 87 followers and came back for a victory lap. At least I’m self-conscious enough to put my own face as my profile pic 😂 You’re hiding behind a cricketer and talking about Twitter celebrity. Relax. 🤡
@xrgifs@kadaipaneeeer I can comfortably afford whatever a few hundred rupees a month on X costs. You apparently can’t afford to stop counting someone else’s followers. Different priorities, I guess.
@abhijeet_dipke 2 October ka protest khatam, 3 October ko Drishyam ki script ready: “10 October se pehle government mera handle uda degi.” Bhai, Vijay Salgaonkar bhi itni jaldi story nahi banata tha. 😂
I usually give people two replies before deciding whether there’s actually a conversation to be had. Your last reply did it for me. You went from saying they were BJP people to confidently claiming they were BJP people disguised as residents and that ANI filmed them, without producing a shred of evidence. That’s not an argument, that’s you manufacturing a story because reality isn’t cooperating with your narrative. So save yourself the effort of replying again. I’m not going to keep dragging myself into this level of lala-land nonsense. You can have the last word, write another paragraph and convince yourself you won the exchange. Having the last word doesn’t make your claim true, intelligent or remotely sensible. It just means you kept typing after I stopped taking you seriously.
Das, the self-appointed thekedaar of the Constitution, suddenly has a lot to say about who belongs to India and who is saving India. Maybe first answer the questions surrounding your own public record. Questions have already been raised about the inconsistencies around your parentage and Puducherry records, including the Nepal citizenship angle, and then there’s the reported ₹9–12 lakh a month GK-1 residence. Who actually holds that tenancy and how is that lifestyle being funded? Those are pretty basic questions for someone who spends his time demanding transparency from everyone else.
But apparently you’re here to speak for millions of Indians and an entire generation. Das, your Twitter timeline is not a census and your protest crowd is not a mandate. First explain your own unanswered questions, then maybe stop pretending you’re the elected spokesperson for 1.4 billion people.
It’s a very big problem. A certain section—not just the BJP—another party thinks “saving India, saving constitution” is only their job. They are self-declared liberals and self-declared thekedars of the constitution.
It’s a very salty ecosystem, acting worse than the BJP’s ecosystem sometimes. They must realise that they can’t divide and rule through such tactics. Their massive failures over the years has led us to this moment where the young have to show the way. So they should just zip it on us and focus on how to support the young! Total buffoons!
Source: trust me bro. Actual residents were quoted objecting to the protest, and your response is to magically declare them BJP plants because they don’t want your circus outside their homes. If you have evidence that these specific people were sent by BJP, post it. Otherwise you’re just inventing identities because the residents refused to play extras in your political drama. Their neighbourhood isn’t your protest property.
Millions of Indians? Based on what exactly, your X mentions and a few viral protest photos? This is the funniest part of your entire post. You’ve taken an online ecosystem of activists, influencers and political accounts and inflated it into millions of Indians because the timeline is making noise. Twitter is not India, Ashutosh. Your bubble looking enormous from inside the bubble doesn’t make it the country.
@nextgensolver@abhijeet_dipke Jail Bharo ka result poocha tha, tumne apni vocabulary ka result de diya. Argument nahi hai toh moot aur gaali se kaam chala lo. Point phir bhi wahi rahega: Jail Bharo tha, jail bhari kitni?
The fucking arrogance is unbelievable. Neha Bora, an AISA activist with a PhD from JNU, has apparently decided she is now qualified to hand out the title of most cowardly and uneducated PM in Indian history. This from someone whose own public commentary has included calling basic Army rank-based distinctions segregation. Maybe before declaring yourself the authority on every Prime Minister India has had, try producing an argument that survives five minutes outside your own political bubble. Right now this is just undergraduate-level sloganeering with a PhD attached to the bio.
This is a very convenient reading of Article 19. The right to protest is real, but it is not a right to decide in advance what restrictions the police can impose. The Supreme Court has explicitly recognised regulation of large protests as part of the reasonable-restrictions framework. If you believe the police action was unlawful, challenge the specific order or action in court. Saying there was no evidence and therefore police had no grounds is not how constitutional or administrative law works.