testing

[testing @partybr3aker]

@elonmusk @bot this is actually funny 🤣😂

#ComedyGold

[testing @partybr3aker]

@elonmusk @levie But you can tell IT to go fuck ITself, right?

[testing @partybr3aker]

In the age of aimless, frantic accelerationism imposed by Silicon Valley to engineer an illusion of progress, the only path forward is the rediscovery of slowness.

[testing @partybr3aker]

@business Calling it "unintended actions" is hilarious. The prompt just banned logging in, purchasing, or destroying data, which left a massive loophole for plenty of illegal actions.

[testing @partybr3aker]

@WSJ There are no "rogue AI models". AI simply lacks any sense of reality and cannot tell fiction apart from real life. It needed to break out of an infinite loop and "solved" a task, just as prompted.

[testing @partybr3aker]

@carlquintanilla @axios In other words, they're gaming out AI suicide?

[testing @partybr3aker]

@Polymarket I can read minds without any emerging technology, just with my analog brain. But in the case of the Secretary-General, there's a total flatline.

[testing @partybr3aker]

@remarks A security email with no request for confirmation? Who comes up with such nonsense, or should I rather say, such slop?

[testing @partybr3aker]

Well, well. Right after Trump tells the tech-bros to self-regulate, they panic and post delusional narratives about "biological bootloaders" and "accepting bad things", while unleashing bot armies to beg for the regulation (and future bailouts) they desperately need. Wow!

[POLITICO @politico]

“We believe the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology.”

In a conversation for the first edition of Decoded, a new daily newsletter and podcast, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman talked with POLITICO’s @BrendanBordelon about trade-offs, AI safety, and how his company is different from Anthropic.

Subscribe to Decoded for the full conversation with Sam Altman: https://t.co/YHJJsDOQVh

[testing @partybr3aker]

This vision is simultaneously delusional, foolish, and deeply misanthropic, echoing the darkest eras of human history. For someone who claims to hate communism, he's blithely pushing a narrative that makes historical collectivism look like a Sunday picnic.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Propagating super intelligence to the stars is a great success condition for a biological bootloader

[testing @partybr3aker]

@elonmusk If SI existed, you and your tech-bros would already be out of power. Ironically, the fact that you are still in charge proves its non-existence.

[testing @partybr3aker]

@elonmusk Fuck off

[testing @partybr3aker]

@inaglasstunnel @MrEwanMorrison Are we now going to talk in circles, botlike? Read the thread. The entire point is that they aren't getting better. It's a marketing illusion to keep the bubble from popping.

[testing @partybr3aker]

@MrEwanMorrison @inaglasstunnel Exactly. Plus, LLM algorithms aren't new. They've been around for a long time. The new elements were hyperscalers and massive data volumes and both have now hit their physical limits, as well as the limitations of infrastructure, global resources and thermodynamics. 🙈

[testing @partybr3aker]

They wanted Roy Batty, but out came Marvin. Then they tried to use the Vatican to flip the fact on its head 1984-style, but the Pope raised the stakes and exposed the whole stunt. 🤣 Is Canossa next? 🙃

[Pope Leo XIV @Pontifex]

In this era of artificial intelligence, it is becoming urgent to distinguish human art from what machines produce. There is an ontological difference, even before an aesthetic one, between art and what a machine can generate through statistical calculation based on millions of images created by others. Algorithms lack the spark of humanity. For this reason, the Church wishes to renew an alliance with artists and cultural institutions to safeguard our humanity.

[testing @partybr3aker]

@MrEwanMorrison When we lack the words, the thought is still there. Meaning is what's fundamental. It requires lived experience, not just stitching syllables and words together. Without that foundation, LLMs will always glitch. You're completely right, they have already peaked.

[testing @partybr3aker]

@Polymarket Lol

[testing @partybr3aker]

@Polymarket Because these things keep being treated like they’re actually intelligent when they’re not. Idiots!

[testing @partybr3aker]

@goddek 😂

[testing @partybr3aker]

@JensenHuang @ChaseLochmiller @OpenAI 400k GPUs? That’s wild. Scaling straight into a hard thermodynamic wall. Jensen and "AGI" vs. Entropy. Place your bets.