I once met a young woman doing a PhD in Eastern European history.
In good faith, I asked her about the Srebrenica genocide, and she accused me of using it as ‘an anti-feminist talking point’.
So if being anti-male-genocide is “anti feminist”, what does that say about feminism?
Just stop.
Literally, the biggest European genocide since the holocaust was against 8,000 Bosnian men and boys, who were selectively killed in Srebrenica because of their gender, which the @UN were actively complicit in.
And it's not just in Eastern Europe, it happens across the world...
Saddam's Anfal Campaign (1988): 100,000 Kurdish men and boys selectively killed.
The British Siege of Delhi (1857): Around 9,000 men and boys selectively killed.
The Bangladesh Liberation war (1971): hundreds of thousands of men and boys selectively killed.
Kashmir (ongoing): Thousands of men and boys disappeared, selectively kidnapped, or killed.
Aksum (2021): Several hundred men and boys selectively rounded up and executed.
Nigeria (ongoing): Tens of thousands of boys taken, and turned into child soldiers.
World War Two (1933-45): 5,000 - 15,000 gay men selectively killed in concentration camps.
There are simply too many examples to give, of men and boys being killed because of their gender.
I am so tired of idiotic social media acolytes saying ‘misandry doesn’t kill’, when millions of men and boys have died for that very reason.
The utter arrogance and entitlement of such people, to assume that just because they don't know something, must surely mean it doesn't happen.
So please, stop pretending that "misandry doesn't kill", because it’s not fair for men and boys to pay the price of your ignorance.
Misandry kills. Misogyny kills.
If you cannot say that, then sit this one out and please be quiet.
Thank you.
It means Nazi sympathisers and ethnicity-driven supremacists.
And also, thanks to our irresponsible media and political rhetoric, anyone who believes in borders, biological sexes and colour-blind equality before the law.
In this way, people who have nothing to do with Nazis are smeared as Nazis, ironically, to attempt to prevent them from becoming Nazis.
In this way, a tiny number of actual Nazis (who hate the majority of the people who are today called "far right") are taken as evidence of the existence of a massive far right which has to be countered through censorship, visa bans and suppression.
I covered the last Tommy rally and talked to hundreds of people. We encountered one person who was genuinely unpleasant (and not so much for his opinions but for being drunk and obnoxious). The rest were normal, ordinary people with opinions shared by the majority of the country.
The reality is that the media who tell you the opinions the people they report on supposedly have don't actually talk to them. I saw one prominent mainstream journalist at the last protest who actually went into the crowd and chatted to people. The rest of them stand in front of a group of protestors and tell you the company line.
This applies to every issue, btw. Once you see it, you can't unsee it.
I'm AGAIN reminding you that woke is far from dead. It's further entrenching itself in preparation for full-scale lawfare.
Universities & law schools are packed with more True Believers than ever before. We're gonna get absolutely REKT if we're just relying on executive orders.
I am once again reminding you that woke is not dead. It has only more deeply entrenched itself during the 2020 moral panic over "systemic racism."
The racial equity initiatives resulted in a massive hiring spree of far-left DEI hires. They're all going up for tenure now.
I do wonder if anyone on the left will ever realise that driving millions of people (including billionaires) who used to vote for you away with lunatic policies and then implying they're bad people for not voting for you is not a winning strategy?
Most tech oligarchs were compliant little wokeists or at best silent and complicit objectors until very recently. Same with many in business.
As it was in the UK where wealthy people were standing in line to give money and support to Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson.
If you don't want media platforms to be owned by wealthy people who support your opponents, don't complain - give them someone better to vote for!
Whilst everyone was focusing on the manosphere and watching Adolescence, nobody has considered the radicalisation of young women, which appears numerically to be a far greater problem.
An update on my lawsuit against Cornell for their secret and illegal search for a "diversity hire" evolutionary biologist.
In short, Cornell isn't even contesting the fact that their job search was racially discriminatory. They're instead trying to argue that I left academia and wouldn't have applied to it even if the job search was posted publicly.
That's very revealing.
But this is false: While I did leave my academic position at Penn State in 2020, I was still searching for, and applying to, academic jobs in addition to non-academic jobs.
I applied to a different position at Cornell months before their racist job search because I had specific interest in working there. And I applied to @uaustinorg in 2021. I have the applications to prove it. I would have applied to their 2020 evolutionary biology position had it been posted publicly (which they were required to do) and not been race-based (which is illegal).
Cornell wants to make this all go away. But we're not going away. They got caught, and are now being held accountable.
@become_salient It's really awful how much animosity and misunderstanding there is between men and women these days, so bad the West is in demographic decline.
No doubt that decades of misandry from the media and social sciences have contributed to this.
https://t.co/9mK7YmbokM
For years, the SPLC has labeled us a terrorist organization, put us in their “Extremist Files,” and likened us to Nazis for trying to protect children, while, as the FBI announced today, they simultaneously funded actual Nazi organizations around the country.
Because of their slanderous libel, we were banned from over a dozen platforms, including payment processors PayPal and Venmo (which we are still unable to use to this day).
This begs the question… should we sue their asses off?
Here is this paper's "Positionality Statement," which I think is more accurately described as a Conflict of Interest disclosure.
"These identities and the geographic context informed the development of biology content..."
Yes, we know. That's the problem.
It's not enough to eventually win this debate after many years of fighting for the principles of evidence-based medicine in "gender-affirming care."
We must fix the system that was able to severely limit reasonable dissent from appearing in the academic record.
The HRC has lied for over a decade about a supposed "epidemic of violence" against the trans community fueled by "white supremacy."
@benshapiro breaks down the findings in @dontshoothedata's and my latest article in City Journal exposing that lie.
Our investigation found:
- Trans homicide rates are below the that of the general population (debunking the "epidemic" narrative)
- The large majority of suspects are black, not white (debunking the "white supremacy" cause)
- The HRC wrongfully compares homicide rates of black men who identify as women to black women to make homicide rates seem inflated, when in reality black men to identify as women have homicide rates substantially below black men generally.
- And much more (see full report below)!
The HRC publishes their blatant lies in annual "Epdemic of Violence" reports to whip up a moral panic and secure donation money, even though their lies actively harm people who identify as transgender by supporting policies disconnected from reality.
It's not compassionate to lie about the nature of transgender homicides; it's exploitative.
Read our City Journal article here:https://t.co/59VQbpDc9n
Read our full report here:https://t.co/riV2m6zrgs
I’ve spent the last year working on a story about the Mellon Foundation, the mega-wealthy private nonprofit that has a monopoly on humanities funding in America. The article, about how Mellon has held the humanities hostage to its progressive political ideology, is out today. 🧵
This is just completely false. Quacks were spreading rumors online immediately following Kirk's assassination that Israel was involved.
Netanyahu first responded to these accusations the day after Kirk's murder (September 11) on Newsmax when Greta Van Susteren specifically asked him to respond to online rumors of Israel's involvement. So, naturally, he responded to the question and denied Israel's involvement.
The baseless conspiratorial rumors continued to grow and amplify, prompting him to post a video on X addressing those claims again.
This was not a preemptive denial, as Brett claims it was. This is a highly irresponsible claim to make on such a massive platform. It took me 1 minute to investigate and debunk.
https://t.co/YfVbZVSt3w
The Woke Right importing of Dugin, which has been going on for a decade, by the way, is the effort to bring in postmodernist Leftism into the American conservative movement. Does that help you understand some things more clearly?
It’s absolutely perfect…
A liberal man in NYC yelling about how everyone is welcome, as a Muslim man yells "Allahu Akbar!" and uses him as a literal springboard to throw a homemade bomb.
The West’s suicidal empathy on video.