@Psychonaut1001 Trotskyists create this strange 'deformed workers state' as a refusal to reckon with the counter revolution in the USSR.
The end result is this nonsense, supporting nuclear terror for the sake of a regime that was never proletarian in the first place.
@Psychonaut1001 A communist should be against any sort of imperialist war.
That does not however mean supporting the militarisation of bourgeois states, that is a betrayal of the international working class.
If the US admin follows through on this apparently deliberate recession, one of the effects it may have is creating a much more favourable labour market environment for conducting mass deportations.
If you want me to add my broader analysis, I think that the far right have jumped the gun.
It took real, deep, crisis to produce the Nazis, to get people to sell out their neighbours for slavery and slaughter.
This modern movement feels like larp to me.
Maybe I'm just coping.
I don't use this account very much any more, so it has become a fun experiment in the kinds of things that the unadjusted 'X' algorithm will send you (without for example saying 'i'm not interested in this tweet' etc).
Today I received a push notification for this tweet.
Weird, Hitler predicted over 100 years ago that there was a plot to send brown people into all white countries until our numbers drastically decreased.
Today, every white country is experiencing a drastic decrease in its base population.
Would you say he was right?
What's sad is that only settleroid types are calling this out based on their race politics.
Nobody questions the actual class basis of any of this, farmers are just assumed proletarians.
https://t.co/rBMCmcYqlC
@ProductOfLabor Racism is something that could be solved within bourgeois society, indeed bourgeois society is clearly much less racist than it used to be.
Obviously the communists should not be racist, but anti-racism is not inherently proletarian.
There are endless discussions about the Japanese surrender, in order to cast moral shame or victorious glory onto whichever nation.
The social component however is rarely mentioned, just as it isn't in WW2 in general.
The Japanese political leadership in 1945 feared the prospect of mass famine and internal revolt.
Surrendering to the Americans prevented this from happening.
Just as the Japanese started the war out of fear of political upheaval, so did they end it.
The USSR was completely opportunistic.
They chose Germany because it meant they got more territory.
Had Germany been more willing to concede influence in eastern Europe the USSR would have directly joined the Axis, we know because they were exchanging proposals!
Stalinists are so delusional about 1939-41, it's like an infohazard for them.
They have to completely deny reality to protect the sacred GPW death cult that underpins so much of their ideology (and not coincidentally, the ideology of modern revanchist Russian nationalism).
Checking twitter for the first time in a long while, and my for you is just annoying campist larpers and pseuds getting super mad at electoral politics.
Absolutely zero mention of any labour action of course.
The Nazis came to power within the contexts of the extreme shocks of German imperial collapse, hyperinflation and the great depression.
Truly earth shattering events in German society.
Neo-Nazis meanwhile, seem to want to murder their neighbours without any of that.
I think a weird thing about neo-Nazis is that are not really proper Nazis; they are weird reactionary freaks to be sure, but the actual NSDAP political base was not made of weird anti-social invalids, it was made of 'normal' people.