@Crowmaonwellth There’s some true in that, but the societal change from 1958-1992 was unusually rapid, by historical standards. For most of history, 3 decades did not produce very much change, so maybe a bit harsh to call our culture ‘stuck’
@RealStanzaga@BriannaWu I suspect at least the first season will be very successful, and then interest may drop off. I don’t think the original movies were very good adaptations of the books, this series looks like either a repeat or a worsening of them
@rationalhumanis@hbomax And those 8 movies weren’t particularly good adaptations (they were ok at their best, nothing more). This just looks like a rehash
@DrewPavlou I think the part about using their own brain + AI affirming their own position + AI being prone to mistakes is pretty reasonable. It’s why I still use AI pretty sparingly, and when I use it for information, I generally check its sources (which often don’t match what AI says)
@NewMexicoRanger@ConceptualJames I can imagine being a juror and thinking the person on trial is probably guilty, but still voting Not Guilty if the objective evidence isn’t good enough
Personal instincts can be wrong, that’s why it’s evidence that matters
@triggerpod What on earth is he talking about? “Checking kids’ genitalia”? Does he think that’s what happens in school sports?
And saying he would unfairly disadvantage his daughter to protect a boy’s feelings is…. Well, it’s interesting
@sandylanceley@darcy27270@jamesmassola Exactly, even if voting isn’t compulsory, a right to vote could still be enshrined in the Constitution, in which case the government would still have to ensure access
@disco___cat And I recall learning the UK used to have literally thousands of miles more railway lines than today, so villages that used to be on railway lines are now only accessible by car. Seems a backwards step to me