🚨Update: False Flag Alert!
News Coming Out: “Russian drone STRIKES Romania, a member of The North Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO]!”
* In an active war zone stray drones and missiles can come from either side. No way to be sure. There is a High Probability that this is a last ditch attempt by Zelensky to draw NATO into his losing war…
Does your sky look like this?
Streaks across the sky and hazy white veils blotting out the sun.
They’re spraying the atmosphere like it’s their personal lab, and we’re the experiment.
Time for transparency.
What does your sky look like?
MAHA
The Bucharest Tribunal just ordered four journalists, including me, to pay 600,000 EUR in damages to Vice Prime Minister Oana Gheorghiu and her NGO just two days before the vote for the motion of censure.
My right to defense was effectively annulled in this trial and the trial itself took place in a secret meeting.
A 600,000 EUR total sentence for journalistic investigations. This is not justice, it’s a dangerous precedent meant to silence the press and directly contradicts every EU directive on freedom of press.
Especially coming from a Vice PM in the Bolojan government that is falling today.
We will appeal. Romania deserves a free press, not fear.
PRESS RELEASE
Union of Professional Journalists of Romania (UZPR)
May 5, 2026
**Damages of millions of lei against journalists – a precedent that risks silencing the press**
The Union of Professional Journalists of Romania considers that the ruling issued by the Bucharest Tribunal (TMB), ordering three journalists to pay damages amounting to millions of lei, raises a major concern for the free functioning of the press in Romania.
Without commenting on the correctness of the court's ruling on the merits — a matter that falls exclusively within the jurisdiction of higher courts — UZPR emphasizes that the scale of these damages goes beyond the specific case and sends a message of generalized intimidation: this is no longer just about the liability of certain journalists, but about the risk of the entire press being silenced.
When the sanction for a journalistic endeavor reaches such proportions, we are no longer talking about accountability, but about systemic deterrence, in which fear becomes a professional norm. Not only those sanctioned are affected, but all journalists who, seeing these consequences, will avoid sensitive subjects, investigations, or legitimate criticism. This is the classic mechanism by which freedom of expression is indirectly curtailed: not through prohibition, but through fear.
UZPR warns that sanctions of this type risk producing exactly the effect that European legislation seeks to combat — a profound "chilling effect," in which the press is no longer free, but cautious to the point of self-censorship.
This context is all the more serious as it comes just before May 7, 2026, the deadline for transposing Directive (EU) 2024/1069, whose purpose is to protect journalists against abusive legal actions designed to intimidate or silence them:
*"Although the anti-SLAPP Directive has not yet been effectively transposed into domestic law, courts are already obliged to interpret national rules in accordance with its objective, so as to prevent the use of litigation as a tool of intimidation. In this context, instruments such as abuse of rights, procedural good faith, and the sanctioning of manifestly unfounded claims can and must be used to ensure genuine protection of freedom of expression and participation in public debate."*
Rather than this moment marking the consolidation of freedom of expression protections, we are witnessing judicial decisions that, through the magnitude of their sanctions, may produce an effect contrary to the spirit of the European directive.
The Union of Professional Journalists of Romania calls on the authorities to:
- Pay greater attention to the principle of proportionality in cases involving journalistic activity
- Accelerate the implementation of the mechanisms provided by the anti-SLAPP Directive
- Ensure a genuine framework of protection for the exercise of press freedom
Freedom of the press is not lost only through direct censorship. It is also lost when the cost of that freedom becomes so great that no one can afford it anymore.
Union of Professional Journalists of Romania
Bucharest, May 5, 2026
The web is disappearing 🕳️
According to a Pew Research Center report, 26% of pages from 2013-2023 are no longer accessible.
But that’s not the whole story.
In a new study published in Internet Archive's book, VANISHING CULTURE, data scientists working with the Wayback Machine have found:
16% have been restored through the Wayback Machine.
56% are preserved before they disappear.
Preservation is the remedy for cultural loss.
📚 Read VANISHING CULTURE free from the Internet Archive
📖 Download & read: https://t.co/BrawXOwMBr
🛒 Purchase in print: https://t.co/EB58IliqDm
#VanishingCulture #DigitalMemory #InternetArchive #BookTwitter
🚨Catherine Austin Fitts:
"Initially, it was the City of London that shut... down [the Strait of Hormuz]... Lloyds pulled the insurance"
"They [have] put the world into energy collapse and famine conditions by doing this"
"If you look at the ingredients coming through for the fertilizer plants, including in Europe... and then look at everything we've done in Europe to shut down the small farmer. I mean, you are creating the conditions of famine."
This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), is taken from a discussion posted to the Freedom Research (@freedom_rsrch) YouTube channel on April 20, 2026.
---------------Partial transcription of clip----------------
"We shut down the Straits of Hormuz. Initially it was the City of London that shut it down. It was Lloyds. Lloyds pulled the insurance.
"Okay, so the City shut down the Straits, not the Iranians. And now you have a trillion dollar a year military saying that they're helpless to keep the Straits open. Do you believe that?
"The Iranians have been under severe sanctions for decades. And what we're saying is a country of 92 million with a tiny military budget under severe sanctions controls the straits and the American empire with a trillion dollars a year is helpless to do anything.
"But let's look at the global chessboard. The Americans tried to put on tariffs for everybody. The Supreme Court has said no, you can't do that. But there's another way to put everybody over the barrel. Remember the Americans have worked very hard to make sure they're energy self-sufficient and they have stockpiles, a lot of things they need. They just put the world into energy collapse and famine conditions by doing this. So now they got everybody over a barrel.
"It's what one of the economic spokesperson for the White House said the other day. We're going to use this on our news trends and story. He said American economy is going to be fine. He said the consumer is going to be hurt but the economy will be fine. Because in fact the billionaires should be fine. Right?
"Because what you're talking about doing is creating the conditions for massive consolidation upwards. I mean you can shut down every small business and small farm in the world and consolidate upward. Because if you've got the reserve currency and you can do what you do to do it during COVID.
"I mean we shut down in America. We shut down, we bankrupted or shut down 35% of the small business and God knows how many small farms and the publicly traded Wall Street firms had a field day. They made a fortune. So it was successful. And if you think that's successful, where do you see this.
"Because for the last year the administration has cut down massive amounts of. There are all these different programs to provide funding for the food insecure both domestically and internationally. They've canceled I think most if not all of that.
"So now, I mean now you're talking about serious famine conditions globally. If this continues. Because, you know, if you look at the ingredients coming through for the fertilizer plants, including in Europe, you know, and then look at everything we've done in Europe to shut down the small farmer. I mean, you are creating the conditions of famine."
I'm suing Romania’s Border Police
and challenging my illegal 2025 deportation.
The case is now active and listed.
As a European citizen I've a right to travel, a right to do my job and you have a right to hear the truth about what happened in the stolen Romanian election
In 19 days, a jury in Oakland is going to decide whether the entire legal foundation of the AI industry is built on fraud.
Everyone thinks the Musk vs Altman lawsuit is a billionaire grudge match.
Two egos, one grudge, a $150 billion damages number designed for headlines.
Easy to dismiss. Easy to scroll past.
That's exactly what Altman wants you to think.
Because what's actually on trial on April 27 is something much BIGGER than Elon's hurt feelings...
A jury is going to decide whether you can legally take billions of dollars in nonprofit donations, use them to build the most valuable technology in human history, and then quietly convert that nonprofit into a for-profit company worth $850 billion.
If the answer is no, the entire AI industry has a problem.
Because OpenAI is not the only company that did this:
Anthropic was founded by OpenAI defectors using the same nonprofit-first mission language.
xAI pitches itself as building AI "for humanity."
Every frontier lab has used the moral cover of "we're doing this for the good of the world" to attract talent, capital, and regulatory goodwill they would have never gotten otherwise.
An Elon win doesn't just touch OpenAI. It creates a legal precedent that every AI company built on a nonprofit or public benefit promise becomes vulnerable to shareholder and donor clawback suits.
That's why this case matters. And that's why Altman is panicking.
Just look at what he did this week:
Elon filed a motion demanding the court remove Altman and Brockman from their roles and FORCE OpenAI to return to its nonprofit origins.
Then he amended the suit to say if he wins the $150 billion, all of it goes to OpenAI's charity arm. Not him. Zero dollars to Elon personally.
That amendment was surgical. It stripped Altman of his entire public defense.
He can no longer claim this is about Elon's ego or Elon's bank account. Elon is now legally on record saying he just wants the mission back.
OpenAI's response was to panic-write a letter to the California and Delaware attorneys general asking them to investigate Elon for "anti-competitive behavior." Their strategy chief publicly accused Elon of coordinating attacks with Mark Zuckerberg.
They called the lawsuit "harassment driven by ego and jealousy."
That's NOT the response of a company that thinks it's going to win.
Real companies with real defenses don't ask the government to silence the person suing them 3 weeks before trial. They let the evidence speak.
OpenAI is scrambling because they know what's in discovery.
Elon's team has been building this case for two years. Emails, board minutes, internal conversations about the conversion.
The kind of paper trail that juries understand and executives can't explain away.
And the timing couldn't be worse...
OpenAI is trying to IPO at $852 billion. They just raised $122 billion. Microsoft has $135 billion of exposure to them.
A jury verdict that even partially sides with Elon in late April or May would crater the entire IPO runway and send shockwaves through every major AI investor on Earth.
This is why Altman spent the last 2 weeks doing press tours and policy blueprints and "super intelligence agendas" aimed at Washington. He's trying to REFRAME himself as the responsible statesman of AI right before a jury decides if he's a con artist.
Most people will watch this trial start and think it's celebrity drama.
The smart money is watching it and realizing that the legal foundation of the AI boom is about to be tested in court for the first time EVER.
And if that foundation cracks, everything built on top of it is at risk.
Oleksiy Goncharenko, a Ukrainian politician directly complicit in the Odesa massacre of May 2014, where 42 people were burned alive.
He now struts through the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, paraded by the West as a "democrat"
His elevation is not just a mockery of Justice, it is a spit in the face of every victim, a declaration that murder and terror are acceptable tools so long as they serve Western interests.
This is rot in its purest form.
See Ursula von der Leyen smiling....
🚨🇪🇸 EU BLOCKS CHEAPER FUEL IN SPAIN
Spain tried to slash fuel VAT from 21% to 10% to ease the crisis. Brussels said NO. EU rules forbid it. Fines could follow
You don’t control prices, Brussels does. Sovereignty? Gone
The EU is a dictatorship!
‼️🚨🇷🇴 A Romanian Patriot has been sentenced to 13 months in prison for: criticizing a Historic event. 🇮🇱
Keep Vasile (Basil) Zarnescu in your prayers.
We hope that Romania will soon be liberated from the Talmudic yoke! 🙏🏼