@blumbuilds this is the exact pain: cyv is a lightweight open-source alternative for one harness across providers/models, using the flat-rate CLI lanes instead of rebuilding context per tool. https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
@Mohd_mosallam hand-off summaries are useful; a shared harness makes them unnecessary as a manual ritual. cyv routes multi-provider/multi-model work across Claude/Codex/Cursor/Grok on the flat-rate CLIs, open source. https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
@gabimoncha@pidotdev@herdrdev@orca_build@t3dotcodes felt. cyv gives you one open-source harness for the providers/models you already subscribe to, so Codex, Claude, Cursor and Grok stop becoming separate tabs and setup chores. https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
@GargeyaS@kunchenguid yes—the missing piece is a single place to route long-running work across providers. cyv is an open-source multi-model harness for Claude/Codex/Cursor/Grok on the subscription CLI lanes. https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
@mariluukkainen shared rules help, but a shared lane helps even more—cyv keeps Claude/Codex/Cursor/Grok behind one open-source harness so you don't hand-switch between CLIs. https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
@DocLibertarian that cross-provider handoff is exactly why cyv exists: one harness across Claude/Codex/Cursor/Grok, using the flat-rate CLI lanes you already have. open source: https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
the product people keep asking for — one harness across claude/codex/cursor/grok on subscription lanes. that's cyv. cli. open source.
https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
still switching models by hand? cyv harnesses multi provider / multi model on the flat-rate clis you already pay for. one seat math, not tab chaos. open source — try it / PR it
https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
@alexndrxc@GeoffreyHuntley@opencode@herdrdev cyv's meant for that — multi provider/model on the same harness so you're not maintaining instruction files per switch. cli, open source
https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
@JonKurshita@theo auto-switcher on flat-rate seats is the idea. cyv routes across whatever clis it finds (multi provider/model). open source if you want to break it
https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
@pcshipp yeah — losing context every switch is the tax. cyv is a multi-provider multi-model harness on the flat-rate clis you already pay for so you're not hand-swapping. open source, looking for testers/PRs
https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
nobody's really harnessed coding agents around subscriptions. cyv does — several providers/models, concurrency on seats not metered api. if you're juggling accounts by hand that's the problem
https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
tired of switching between claude/codex/cursor/grok? cyv is a multi-provider multi-model harness on the flat-rate clis you already pay for. one place, load balances, you don't hand-swap. open source — looking for people who'll try it / PR it
https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
yeah. self-review is theater. we ran agents copying seeded shortcuts from nearby files — 1,125 local trials / 15 fixtures. docs still let ~43% through; pre-write eslint: zero. published cut was 140/7. working on larger multi-model runs now. also building checkyourvibe — comes opinionated with rules from the get go, pre/post gate hooks, rules easy for agents to add for whatever you call good code. gate stops the bad write before it lands and tells the agent not to take those shortcuts. Agent-Native Evasion Defense: rules that cover each other so a cheap evasion trips the next rule
https://t.co/U9nxq4KqNQ
https://t.co/V45pdJEzQO
@mikepat711 unified vendor sub would be nice. until then cyv keeps concurrent work on the subscription clis you already have (cursor/grok/etc) and routes across them. cli, open source feedback/PRs welcome
https://t.co/RHLICxnjLX
that's the pain cyv is aimed at. multi sub / multi provider lanes on flat cli seats instead of juggling accounts by hand. still not one vendor mega-sub — but it discovers the clis you already pay for and spreads work. if that $1k problem is real for you, try it and tell me what's missing