โThey were just ceramic vasesโ > โThey were children.โ
See the difference?
โItโs just a clump of cellsโ > โTheyโre an unborn child.โ
โTheyโre just savagesโ > โTheyโre slaves.โ
The reason they dehumanise people is because they know itโs ethically wrong in every scale, but choose to continue to satisfy their own narcissism.
They are truly evil.
This man has singlehandedly saved hundreds of babies from abortion.
Kenneth Calvin Jr. stands outside Planned Parenthood every week, talking to mothers and fathers who feel like abortion is their only option, and offering them real, tangible help so they don't abort their child.
In 2025 alone, he helped save 130 confirmed babies. And he trains other pro-lifers to evangelize, reach families outside abortion clinics, and save even more babies. He's a man of great faith, integrity, and boldness.
And with NJ Governor Mikie Sherill making it illegal to pray outside abortion clinics and MA Governor Maura Healey codifying abortions up until the moment of birth, his work is needed now more than ever.
But I just learned that right now, Kenneth and his family are the ones who need help. He underwent major heart surgery yesterday and is currently sedated and recovering in a resting coma. He won't be able to work or evangelize for months.
So his friends are raising money not only to support his wife and four children while he recovers, but to help Kenneth continue and expand the pro-life ministry he's built when he's back on his feet.
Watch his story. And if it moves you, please consider joining me in blessing Kenneth and his family with an incredible surprise by giving to his fundraiser below. ๐
Because ON have sold out to jews.
Literally every nation but Israel that has jewish leadership has replacement migration policies, and the founders of the UN admitted this.
Put two and two together.
One Nation decided to give up its mandate to radically change Australia's immigration and instead acquiesced to the demands of big business to adopt a migration policy not so dissimilar to Labor.
Absolute betrayal. They're not going to improve without pressure so everyone needs to rhetorically apply pressure and withdraw whatever support you have left. We can't be blindly led by traitors dressed in orange.
@BashlinCore@C2Antiquity I donโt really like Cleave, but come on. This is so obvious, thatโs not even his tag.
JAWabros need to chill. ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
@TheOtherPaul2 ON wonโt do anything.
Both Labor and ON are sucking jewish dick and not getting it out anytime soon. For as long as they influence our parties, the replacement migration will not stop. White Australia saw this, and they were destroyed for it.
God save Australia.
@alicefaith218@pjackaugusto The burden of proof is not on me but rather on the one who made the positive claim.
You deposit; we worship Mary.
And then invoke Exodus 20:4.
I am engaging with that by telling you to exegete it. What is worship?
@alicefaith218@pjackaugusto This doesn't prove anything and, furthermore, begs the question:
What is worship?
If you can't exegete a text, then your credibility as an "ex-Catholic" comes into question.
@alicefaith218@pjackaugusto Exodus 20 doesn't say anything without exegesis.
Define worship, or it means nothing.
If you can't define terms like "worship" or properly exegete a text, then perhaps you shouldn't be debating. :/
Because Achan stole from Ai.
I am not deflecting; you quite literally are. And here's why:
1. Under formal logic, the person who makes the positive claim must define the terms invoked.
2. You made the positive claim, that Catholics worship Mary.
C. Ergo, the burden is on you to define worship.
Which you haven't.
We can get to Exodus 40, but the terms used become meaningless if undefined. Therefore, we need to establish the means through which we can cross-examine Exodus.
This is basic logic.
@alicefaith218@pjackaugusto This is a terrible argument; God scolded Joshua because Israel had stolen enemy belongings.
Now let's return. Are they guilty of idolatry? Yes or no.
Your reluctance to answer anything from me is telling.
"Worship is worship."
You don't see how that's circular? You can't invoke the term in question to define the term; that establishes nothing.
Allow me to explain the problem.
Catholics do not worship Mary but venerate her. Regardless of the distinction, you say it's the same thing. By collapsing the distinction between veneration and worship, and instead saying they're the same thing, that collapses your entire faith.
Thousands of Old Testament figures who bowed to golden Cherubim [Ex. 25], bowing to kings [1 Ki. 1], and, by command in the New Testament to greet one with a holy kiss [Ro. 16; 1 Cor. 16; 2 Cor. 13; 1 Thess. 5; 1 Pet. 5]--all signs of veneration--are actually examples of idolatry in your paradigm.
This puts you in a dilemma; if you collapse the distinction between veneration and worship, then you omit the entire Bible.
1. In your paradigm, you omit your own ability to relate uniquely to God. You are merely venerating Him, and by extension, you worship everyone but God.
2. However, if you grant the veneration/worship distinction, you then have to concede that Catholics do not worship Mary.
This is the issue you've created, which you must answer, and it's quite frankly, a far larger problem for you than your accusation of me.
@alicefaith218@pjackaugusto Again, you canโt invoke that term because you havenโt defined it.
What makes bowing down to your mother any different from worshipping God?
You collapsed the dulia and latria distinction, you have to answer that.