TRATOR ANDREW HASTIE: Watch how Sharri Markson exposes Andrew Hastie as two-faced and a source and doing more than just “responding to a subpoena” when he turned on Ben Roberts-Smith: The guy is insufferable. Watch
Andrew Hastie says he believes in the rule of law.
In 2024, Labor retrospectively rewrote Australia’s war-crimes law, backdating it to 2002. That change is now being relied on in Afghanistan war-crimes prosecutions.
It passed on the voices, so we don’t know where Hastie stood.
Every journalist interviewing Andrew Hastie today should ask him one simple question: do you support retrospectively changing criminal law to make prosecutions of veterans easier?
Milton Dick #qt goes into protection mode after Anthony Albanese shows what he really thinks about women MPs after his disrespectful treatment of Liberal MP Melissa McIntosh.
The PM ducked and dived answering her powerful question re housing. Watch👇 auspol
@carmel_hilder@Rexdinasaur@GreenTyler27 Keep that in mind when you hear local anti-nuclear activists claiming "We don't have the expertise" (as though ANSTO is run by amateurs).
An Australian engineer built a micro nuclear reactor that can be mass-produced in months, fits on the back of a ute, with a 5 year refuel cycle - as simple as a swap-and-go gas bottle to replace. The fastest and lowest cost reactor build in American history. Trump called Australian Bobby Gallagher "one of the greatest in the world".
This is banned in Australia.
UNFIT FOR OFFICE
What an absolute disgrace.
The first law officer of the land, Attorney-General Michelle Rowland in the Albanese Regime, has just engaged in textbook victim-blaming — implying Pauline Hanson has brought death threats on herself.
This is the Attorney-General’s reported line:“I don’t wish any politician any ill will, irrespective of their political persuasion … BUT I think sometimes when comments like this are made, one needs to look at oneself and one’s behaviour.”
She also suggested Hanson “should examine what her party and what her ideology and her behaviour is doing, and whether or not that is encouraging that.”
The nation’s chief law officer should never create excuses for violence or shift responsibility onto the person being threatened.
Death threats are a crime. The only person responsible is the one making them.
Suggesting a politician “look at herself,” her party, her ideology or the “standards” she accepts is an attempt to rationalise intimidation.
That is not the language of someone fit to uphold the law. Michelle Rowland is unfit for office.
What’s next?
Women who go out in public “scantily dressed” and are sexually assaulted “need to look at themselves and their behaviour and the kinds of standards that they accept”?
It is exactly the same logic: blame the target, soften the crime, and treat violence as an understandable consequence of speech or association you dislike.
And remember it was only last week that elderly female One Nation volunteer was bashed in public by leftist thugs.
An Attorney-General’s first duty is equal protection under the law, not political scoring while a senator’s security detail is being ramped up because of threats.
Condemning violence without the “BUT she should look at herself” caveat is the minimum standard. Rowland failed it.
Rowland has demonstrated she is completely unfit for office. But sadly, she is another example of the worst Government in our nation’s history.
https://t.co/JYhA85oSv8
This morning Labor Minister Matt Thistlethwaite defended Albanese and Chalmers calling One Nation “dangerous” and a “threat”, saying they were “telling the truth” and that “it’s legitimate to raise that”.
An hour later this picture was taken in Bendigo alongside a video-game character that blows itself up like a suicide bomber.
The standard you walk past is the standard you accept. Labor has a problem with language that invites political violence against their opposition.
URGENT UPDATE: YouTube just took down our latest NDIS fraud investigation at the request of the business we investigated @PeteZogoulas
This is a massive attack on free speech in Australia
Our video is still up on X, we want to thank @elonmusk for defending free speech
We will fight this
@Peter_Fitz For context one of these experts was an MIT Nuclear Engineer.
I wouldn’t be surprised if these ‘nuclear experts’ you refer to couldn’t pick out an image of a nuclear plant from a coal plant.
“This post needs to go viral – NOW!
So, as you might have heard, Australia’s controversial Digital ID bill was recently passed in Federal Parliament.
And no, this isn’t about logging into Medicare “more easily.” This is the wet dream of every power-drunk bureaucrat who’s ever fantasised about tracking what you eat, watch, spend, say – and even think.
Labor rammed it through with help from the Greens and Jacqui Lambie, while the likes of Pauline Hanson, Malcolm Roberts, Matthew Canavan, Ralph Babet, Alex Antic and Gerard Rennick strongly opposed it.
Experts lined up to say it was dangerous. Legal groups shredded it. Privacy advocates screamed. The public wasn’t consulted. But they damn well passed it anyway.
This bill is not about “protecting your identity” – it’s about owning it.
Without a digital ID, you will eventually have no access to a bank account, cash, Centrelink, MyGov, flights, fuel, medication, voting in elections, and even receiving parcels in the mail.
And you can kiss goodbye to ever renting a home, owning a car, using social media, shopping online, accessing the internet at all, having a phone number, and buying groceries.
They say it’s “voluntary” – just like MyGov was “optional” until 10 million Aussies were forced into it just to access basic services.
Just like the COVID-19 vaccine was “optional” until those who resisted found themselves locked out of society for months for not being up-to-date with their boosters.
It’s coercion and blackmail with a friendly smile.
And now that this thing’s been jammed through Parliament, the tech giants are lining up like pigs at a data trough. They’ve already got your search history, your online purchases, your late-night Instagram habits, and every whispered “Hey Siri” or “OK Google.”
Now they get to attach all of that to your real name, address, and government-approved ID. That “anonymous data” you thought was floating harmlessly in the cloud? Not anymore.
Your Woolies reward card is now part of your permanent “consumer profile.” Your YouTube comments? Traceable. That shady dating app you thought was private? Good luck with that when your real ID is stitched to everything you do online.
Privacy’s gone, and it’s not coming back. And let's not pretend this data won't be regularly hacked, leaked, or sold to the highest bidder.
And when the system inevitably fails? One blackout, one outage, one “oops” from some contractor, and you’re digitally locked out of your own life, while some AI bot in a call centre tells you to try turning it off and on again.
The committee that was supposed to scrutinise this bill was a total joke. They ignored almost every expert submission, skipped past glaring privacy failures, human rights concerns, and technical red flags, and still gave it the green light.
It wasn’t an inquiry – it was a rubber stamp for the surveillance state controlled by foreign nations.
Every politician who voted for this has just helped build the scaffolding for digital tyranny. This is the infrastructure for a fully centralised, always-on tracking system.
They’ll say it’s for your safety. They’ll say it’s about efficiency. What they mean is: now they know who you are, where you are, what you’re saying, who you’re saying it to, and how to shut you up when you speak too much truth.
This isn’t progress – it’s control, plain and simple.
What we’re seeing isn’t some harmless upgrade – it’s China-style social credit wrapped in an Aussie flag, and you can bet the CCP is watching on proudly, noticing how we've finally caught up.
#GaryJMatthews
Why hasn’t @SenatorWong sought justice for Australian-born grandmother, Galit Carbone, who was murdered by Hamas on Oct. 7 ?
Oh, I forgot, unlike @BoyGeorge, @SenatorWong does NOT stand with the Jews
Well said, Paul. Tanya Plibersek is happy to condemn Pauline Hanson for meeting Tommy Robinson, yet her own husband Michael Coutts-Trotter served nearly three years in jail for heroin trafficking.
Classic Labor hypocrisy, quick to point the finger at other people’s pasts while refusing to look at her own family’s history.
Pauline Hanson has announced she will appeal to the High Court over the Mehreen Faruqi "P*ss off back to Pakistan" case.
This is an important legal fight.
Pauline is standing up for the free speech of all Australians.
She said:
"Too many Australians are afraid to speak honestly about immigration, race, religion, Indigenous policy and other important issues because they worry they will be called racist, dragged through a complaints process or taken to court.
"That is not how a free country should work. Australians choose their government. The government should never get to choose what Australians are allowed to say."
Clare O'Neil offloaded her investment property just before the tax changes. Many in Labor offloaded their investment properties, right before Albanese crashed the market.
Why isn’t our Mass Media talking about this ?
The response to Bondi was
*Strip White men of their weapons
*Allow Isis Fighters and Their wives to become your neighbours
*Give Islamists more of your money
*Spend millions programming people by Establishing Anti Islamophobia schemes
*Ban Naughty words
Remember this