@suchnerve Big AI companies learned nothing from the dot-com bubble and it's showing - we need revenue to survive
For example, we provide human-professional advice for a fee, while most companies charge for "extra features" that serve no purpose to the average user
It’s no secret our CEO Andy Kurtzig is an outspoken critic of AI, despite working in the industry. Read his latest comments in @Futurism exploring how AI chatbots still lack proper safeguards around how to respond for potential mental health crises
https://t.co/VXxd1KkOI6
@kimmonismus The AI search crash isn't a question of if, but when. Billions are being burned on GPUs, yet these companies are barely scraping together millions in revenue.
AI-Ify Yourself: It my save your career
When Pearl's AI operations director Mark Quinn lost his old job to AI, he saw the world was changing. Mark used the tech that replaced him to join Pearl, and now he's helping others update their skillset:
https://t.co/2oG0MUVMhD
@MrEwanMorrison Georgetown estimated it will cost $1T to make AI even just 10% more accurate. We'd be silly to think they're going to foot that bill...
@alastairmci We've noticed people are so much more appreciative when they get to speak with a real person - genuine interaction is now so much more valuable
@TIME At this point it seems like safety isn't a priority for these companies. Would love to see some of these companies adopt the human-oversight model that makes Pearl so much safer