Islamists are trying to get John Cleese’s tour cancelled.
They say he “attacked Islam”.
And complain that “free speech has become a convenient shield for anti-Muslim hostility”.
This is exactly why Labour’s “Islamophobia” definition is so dangerous.
But who are they? 🧵
Flour millers say UK flour consumption is 54kg per person per year.
= 148 g per day.
Gov modelling assumed 59g per day!
That is quite a discrepancy.
We have ended up with higher dose of folic acid in our food than USA, Canada, Australia and NZ.
Sign the petition below.
Well done @ClareCraigPath for working out the numbers for us. The UK will have the highest level of synthetic Folic acid in the world in our diets.
Stop the mandate
Please sign the petition
Adding more to this list today.
The numbers are utterly shocking. It's no wonder people are in disbelief when they see them. I triple check everything as I find it so discombobulating too.
Helps explain where all our money is going and why we can't control our borders.
Former Conservative Party parliamentary candidate Ali Miraj makes light of our demographic replacement while Kemi Badenoch fanboy David Goodhart chuckles.
Watch my response below.
None of these people belong anywhere close to power. They have done enough damage.
In 'Henry V' the Archbishop of Canterbury gives the Salic Law speech, a bogus legalistic lineage-claim to the French crown
The pay-off line at the end when he says 'So that, as clear as is the summer's sun...' gets a laugh from the audience as his rambling is obviously horseshit
In what world did the Government think it acceptable to delete every response to the consultation that helped draft the anti-Muslim hostility definition — Britain’s new Islamic blasphemy law?
It is clear there has been a cover-up in Angela Rayner’s Communities Department.
Did ministers allow extremists to influence the definition while excluding the Free Speech Union and the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) from the process?
This is a national disgrace. The public deserves to know the truth.
The anti-Muslim hostility definition has already had a chilling effect on free speech. It has been weaponised by activists, police forces and even Labour MPs to silence legitimate criticism and debate about Islam.
Restore Britain is not going to throw the women of Piddington, or anywhere else, to the third world wolves because their neighbour may or may not have voted Liberal Democrat two years ago.
British women do not surrender their right to feel safe in their own towns and villages because of how their neighbour voted.
British children should not bear the consequences of decisions made by adults at a ballot box years earlier.
I am not going to ask a frightened woman how she voted before deciding whether her fears are relevant.
Reform have said communities that vote for the wrong party will have these migrants forced on them.
I disagree.
That is not the type of politics I am interested in.
Yesterday I went to Piddington and listened to the people who actually live there.
I met Restore Britain members living in the village, and many others. They all deserve our support - as do those in Epping, Crowborough, Thetford or ANYWHERE else.
There is a genuine fear in the Piddington community about what is going to happen to them. Understandably so.
I am with them, as I am of every other town affected by these vile camps.
Restore Britain will protect British communities and British women whether they voted for us or not.
It is up to us to make that argument to the British people, and urge them to support a party that will deport these men in the millions.
Restore Britain.
There were six chairs, one serving dish, and one cook, and everybody in that house ate the same dinner at the same time whether they liked it or not.
The table was where you sat when you were called, and you were called twice, the second time in a different voice. Dad's chair was Dad's chair. The dish went down in the middle, whatever it was that night, and it went round, and you took what you were given and you asked for more if there was more, and the last helping was negotiated across the table in a way that would have impressed a lawyer.
Nobody had a separate meal. Nobody had a plate made to order. There was no menu and there was no option, and a child who did not like what was in the dish had a choice between that and nothing, and learned to like it, which is how every child in that generation came to eat liver, cabbage, mackerel and a great many other things their grandchildren have never had in front of them.
It was not always harmonious. There were rows at that table, sulks, plates pushed away, a father who read the paper and a mother who had been on her feet since five. It was a family. But it happened every night, in one room, with one dish, and that was the machine that ran a household's food.
Because one shared dinner does several jobs at once. One cook, one shop, one pan. Leftovers from a single dish go into the next one, so the Sunday joint becomes Monday's cold and Tuesday's soup without anybody having to plan it. Every child at that table learned what a dinner was by eating a few thousand of them in a row, and took that into their own kitchen without a lesson.
Now walk into the same house on a Tuesday evening.
One person eats at seven, out of a box, in front of a screen. One had a thing from the microwave at six. One is waiting for a delivery from an app and one has grazed since four and will not be eating at all. Four people, four purchases, four sets of packaging, nobody cooked, and nobody learned anything.
The trade loves that house. A family meal is one transaction. A household of individuals is four, plus the snacks in between, plus the delivery fee. The dinner table was the single biggest obstacle to selling food to a family, and it did not have to be attacked. It only had to be made optional.
Your mother was the reason it was not optional. She decided what was for dinner and when, and everybody sat down to it, and the whole of what a child came to know about food was decided at that dish.
Put the dish in the middle of the table this week. Same food for everybody, same time, phones somewhere else. It is the oldest food policy in the world and it is the only one that ever worked.
This woman is just an ordinary member of her community
Last night she kayaked around police barriers to deliver supplies to men holding up illegal migrant busses in Portsmouth
ABSOLUTE PATRIOT 🫡🇬🇧
The famines that killed the most people all happened to populations that had just been moved off animals and onto a single crop.
Ireland. The cottier is pushed onto the potato while every good acre stays under cattle and dairy for export. In 1847, at the worst of it, almost four thousand vessels carry food out of the country, and at the worst-hit ports it leaves under military guard. Between 1846 and 1850 more live animals leave Ireland than people.
Kazakhstan. A nomadic people living on the milk and the meat of forty million head. In 1929 Moscow decides the nomads must be settled onto grain, because herding does not fit the plan. The average household owns 41 animals in 1929 and 2.2 by 1933. Two Kazakhs in five die.
Ukraine. Grain quotas set above what exists, and the peasant left holding a crop he is not allowed to keep. He has already eaten his animals rather than hand them over, and so has everyone else: Soviet cattle halve in five years and the sheep flocks lose two thirds.
China. In 1958 grain is declared the key link and the pasture is ploughed for it. Procurement rises while output falls, and the country exports grain through the worst of it.
Four famines, three regimes, one sequence. Take the animals. Hand them a crop. Wait for the weather.
A people that eats what it herds cannot be starved by a bad harvest. It has to be disarmed first.
My business collapsed in 2020, and we didn't qualify for PPP. I started looking for marketing jobs and got nowhere despite an incredible portfolio and a decade of experience.
A recruiter who placed creative talent told me the truth.
He said in no uncertain terms that I would need to change my name, start completely over, start “showing solidarity with the underprivileged.” Even then, it would be nearly impossible for me to be placed in a marketing role because of my identity.
I realized at that point that there was no reason for me to hold back anymore. The ships were burned already.
It's build or rot. I started saying whatever the fuck I wanted to online after that. What was the point of anonymity?
And I'm not the only one.
My brother is in the same place despite having written and directed a feature-length film that had a 1m box-office theatrical release.
Both of my brothers-in-law hit a ceiling in their finance and healthcare roles. All future promotions would be going to more diverse candidates.
Now both of them take care of the kids while they build real estate side hustles part-time. Their wives are the main breadwinners.
I know an MBA ops guy with 20 years of experience who is stocking shelves at Walmart.
I know an engineer who's built and launched apps for Fortune 500 companies and has been driving Uber for the last 5 years.
And everyone around you, without fail, even your family, tells you to stop playing the victim card. No blackpilling.
And yeah, that's true. You have to take responsibility for what's under your control.
But the gaslighting needs to stop.
I had a 15 year career in the finance and banking sector, working my way up to director level roles managing teams of over 100 people.
I was made redundant aged 40 and despite a very rare and prestigious CV full of actual real world results, I got 2 interviews out of over 400 job applications.
One interview was for an entry level role at Amazon. I'd tried everything else. Writing individual cover letters. I had 15 different versions of my CV. I researched every company in depth. I treated it as an 8 hour per day job.
The Amazon hiring manager was based in the Philippines. I didn't get the job.
So I started a YouTube channel. The system has discarded people like me and we're now going to totally dismantle and replace it.
DEI entered the scene in the 2010s along with offshoring to India, the Philippines and other low cost locations en mass.
I witnessed DEI policies set targets for staff overall with a particular focus on senior roles. That shut people unfortunate enough to have immutable characteristics like mine totally out of any career progression.
This was whilst every other identity group had mentoring and group support. Women's groups. BME groups. All had direct executive support and visibility.
HR set quotas for percentages of staff at various role levels based on their gender and ethnicity.
Because the boomer men with the huge final salary pensions filled out more than the share for white men, Gen X and Millennial men who had clawed their way up and were the ones doing all the work and actually delivering the results, were the ones first in line to get cut.
HR filter CVs before handing them to hiring managers. They are the gatekeepers. The CVs I received for roles I was recruiting were very far from diverse. White men were a rarity and I was involved in hiring well over 100 roles in my time.
Executive bonuses depended on hitting the DEI gender and ethnicity targets so you'd see 'Transformation' plans being accelerated as year end approached and the final DEI performance metrics were due.
When you're made redundant, you need to sign a contract that often prevents people speaking out about these practices.
Here's a statistic from the UK. Men account for 80% of the increase in unemployment over the past 5 years.
Britain is broken. The extortionate costs, high taxes, petty authority rules and the fact that nothing works properly. A country in serious decline. A decline facilitated by governments for corporate greed.
Britain faces huge difficulties and we don’t have the calibre of politicians to deal with the issues being faced. We have the most useless, insincere and out of touch politicians ever seen in British history. It’s a dreadful situation. We are being led by a bunch of shysters with their nests being feathered by their corporate cronies.
You can feel it in the bills, the queues, the potholes, the closed independent local businesses, the dead high streets and the quiet fury of people who work, pay and cannot make ends meet. Costs are extortionate. Taxes are crushing. Petty rules multiply. Basic things fail. And the people charged with governing treat all of this as a communications problem rather than a national emergency.
This is a wonderful land of plenty island with energy under the sea, food in the soil, fish in the water, a temperate climate and a people who once built industries the world copied. We should have energy security, a serious agricultural and fishing economy, manufacturing worth the name and towns with a living industrial spine. Instead the productive base has been sold, shuttered, offshored or regulated into exhaustion.
The insult is the bill. The tax take is being driven toward historic highs, yet infrastructure and public services rot in plain sight. More than £100bn a year now goes on interest on the national debt - money that builds nothing, heals no one and mends no road. Tens of billions have been committed, over decades, to carbon-capture schemes of doubtful delivery. Farmland is being carpeted with AI data centres and solar panels while food security is talked about as if it were a slogan. Public money is even being put into speculative “sun-dimming” research.
Meanwhile water, energy and food - the three things no country can afford to treat as a casino - are insecure, expensive, or both.
Households are told to tighten their belts. They watch energy firms and parts of the utilities chain post enormous profits while the standing charge and the weekly shop do the damage. That is not a cost-of-living “crisis” in the abstract. It is a transfer of wealth to corporations at our expense.
And through it all, various governments have not acted as the servant of the public. Successive administrations have treated office as a game of positioning, power and punishment. Speech is policed. Minor infractions are hunted. Surveillance is normalised. The hard, unglamorous work of making a country function is ignored.
Pensioners, small firms, students, farmers, fishing communities and disabled people are punished for the next corporism manoeuvre.
Small boat illegal migrant crossings continue; millions are spent housing arrivals in hotels. NHS waiting lists leave people in pain for months. Poverty and homelessness are no longer shocks. They are tragic scenery.
The first duty of any government is to protect the people it claims to represent: their security, their living standards, their industries, their speech and their future. What we have had instead is a political class more fluent in moral theatre than in competence, more attentive to global asset managers and corporate intermediaries than to the communities that hold the country up.
The public pays repeatedly: once in tax, again in prices, and a third time in the slow death of places that used to work.
Britain is not poor. Britain has been mismanaged into looking poor. That is the disgrace. A nation that could feed, power and employ itself has been talked into dependence, then billed for the privilege, then lectured for noticing.
This is not decline by accident. It is decline by permission - granted, year after year, by governments that would rather asset strip the public than serve it.
Shameful.
“THIS ISN’T YOUR KIND OF PLACE.”
That’s what a security guard told me after recognising me while I was interviewing people at 'Black in the Square'.
A public event described as: 'An annual free festival held in Trafalgar Square, London, that celebrates Black culture and creativity.
I had simply walked into the event and started asking questions about what it was about and why London taxpayers were funding it.
Suddenly, I’m being told I shouldn’t be there.
Why? Because I'm a white man? A British patriot?
I’m an Englishman. I have every right to walk into a public event and ask questions.
I was assaulted along with my cameraman, they tried to steel our equipment, threatened us multiple times and called me a racist.
This is Britain in 2026.
A racialised event tells an Englishman that he’s not welcome at an event in his own country.
The more we are demographically replaced, the more this is going to happen. Racism towards white men is an endemic in Britain.
@MayorofLondon - you are an evil traitor.