@tc1415 Westminster has a much stricter standard with misleading.
Lie must be factual. Misleading can be true, but takes people to a conclusion that may be false.
Everyone thinks society is going to collapse when Boomers retire. This is wrong. Most of what Boomers refused to pass down can be learned in 36 months or less. The ultimate test case for this is SpaceX. Elon Musk had to literally reinvent rocket science because NASA "forgot".
@Joe___Allen 1) I would be more amenable to that argument.
2) I think, as a person, I am able to pass judgement on if a speech was, or was not in regard to Wales.
3) Give his examples were not within Wales (his were a list of English cities), I think I'm being reasonable.
The Joe Martin debacle isn’t the first time the Senedd has curtailed dissenting voices.
Just look at how ex-Llywydd Elin Jones banned Gareth Bennett from speaking again in the chamber following his critical comments on gender ideology.
@Joe___Allen I think it certainly undermines his ability to have a discussion in the Senedd on it. Last record looks like Wales >90% White British.
It doesn't seem to be a Welsh issue.
@Joe___Allen I believe the Senedd has the ability to advocate on the behalf of anything concerning Wales to Westminster which is the general enabling part of that.
I'm unsure of how matters happening in England (as the speech focused on English cities) is for the Senedd.