@CscottLawyer@MakeUrMov@tmmalus@PK_Fund CHM might also advise on the regulations that had to be implemented to approve this. Like: “Let’s implement regulations a, b and c, and then come back to get a positive advice”
@DCVaxDefender@jman4956@Investisco Not sure what is the difference between using the money for a stock buyback and issue more shares to keep the company running, or use the money directly to keep the company running.
@CscottLawyer@drugrunner99 Thought about that too. However Management probably doesn’t decide from day to day how many shares they issue (if any), but their broker will. If they might know something, they could hardly relay that to them.
@alphavestcap Wasn’t this a seven‑year process, and now it comes down to a matter of days? $10m is still a lot of money before turning on the revenue stream
@MDendream@hoffmann6383@Cleves_trades Thanks for your thoughts, I am myself disappointed not to see a better explanation why the extreme large addition of authorized shares are needed. After so many years and so close to approval, I think it is fair to present a roadmap to profitability. For now I will vote against.
@hoffmann6383@jascanlan@FlemmingBruce Doesn’t make sense to me to do this deal before confirmation of approval. Why take any chance at all. Any benefit reasons? Tax?
@elonmusk If you start fresh, could you fill the house, the senate, the Sec, the FDA, etc which people that are not managed by Wallstreet, HF managers, Big Pharma. Is that not the real problem? Maybe it is more difficult than putting some guys or girls on Mars!
@smith348572@xMarketNews@UCLANsgy How is this possible if they just keep shorting without covering. It seems all of the institutional investors stay away because of these hedge funds, not because they do not believe in DC-vax, just because of manipulation. Please explain why I am wrong.
@hoffmann6383 Hoff, can conclusion 3, “the SAC sufficiently pleads the elements of a manipulative act, scienter, and reliance.”, be used by Laura that the spoofing is ongoing?
@hoffmann6383@Cheesehammer11 Shouldn’t we expect 50% of the R&R to be identical to the first R&R? Still leaves the magistrate with the most difficult part to reply to, but just 4 months seems rather long.