@Thomas23353301@AdriftHillbilly@Yam_Nivek 1. BP and Conoco-Phillips also lease concessions. The productive activity and price discovery is done by market participants. e.
@Thomas23353301@AdriftHillbilly@Yam_Nivek 2. The SWF is, in fact, less socialist than just a tax scheme. While it is completely held by the state of Norway, it is operated much like a private investment fund, about as modern a capitalist arrangement as it can be.
actually the comparison is not valid. an oil leasing concession is passive
income. oh and the companies buying the leases? private firms.
Norway manages the fund very well, including funding social welfare and infrastructure, but take a company like Kongsberg. shares are half owned by the state (paid for with the fund), but shares are sold on the exchange and run as a private firm.
,
Not socialism. Market sets pricing not the state. the wealth fund revenue is indistinguishable from a tax on private production.
Norway is not socialism. it was an agrarian country that wisely managed their lottery ticket.
well, i grew up there so yes i do know about it.
And by the way, Alaska has a sovereign oil fund as well. i merely point out that sitting on a 1.6 trillion dollar lottery ticket should be disclosed when making a wealth argument. the fund has has been well managed. the oil belongs to the state but is leased as concessions to private resources firms. Again, not socialism.
social democracy is NOT socialism.
Private property including means of production is not automatically state owned and operated in a social democracy .