@CincyNate_@andreperrotta13 but they can though 😂 in this instance it was most likely to establish the fact of the ‘point of contact for physical offenses’ - especially if based on discussion the VAR deemed the ref didn’t see that contact
@therealrthorat@andreperrotta13 they showed both slow-mo AND normal speed. without the audio we can’t know what VAR/Ref discussed while viewing each. they are allowed to use slow-mo to establish the fact of the ‘point of contact for physical offences’ - which could’ve been shown first if the ref didn’t see it
@SamulskiNYC@CFCbeals and the reporting from that one ESPN article is wrong. the on field review showed slow-mo several times AND then in normal speed several times. without hearing the audio, no one knows what the VAR/Ref discussed while viewing each - but they used both speeds which IS allowed.
@_Tobolos_ tbf hardly anyone can stop haaland when they’re already in the box. the stopping needs to happen outside the box; inside the box haaland is a killer
@umirf1 felt they should have dedicated more men out wide to combine and get closer to the byline instead of just congesting the box — or at least vary the play a little bit more
@AJW_ESQ@SirajBawa20@Jaystone812@AdamCrafton_ except that’s just not true. the ref was also shown the normal speed replay 2x before they announced their decision; funny how many people don’t just check the facts for themselves
@DaleJohnsonBBC@young5skiers@MV3DChicken your old pals at ESPN are spreading misinformation that people keep referencing / people not comprehending the IFAB rules properly 🙃 😂
@Jaystone812@SirajBawa20@AJW_ESQ@AdamCrafton_ stop spreading misinformation (even that article is wrong, go watch the actual video). for balo the ref was shown 3x slow-mo then 2x normal speed. for quansah it was also originally deemed no foul by the ref on the field and VAR directed ref to review
@milehighsalute8@AdamCrafton_ stop spreading misinformation 😂 for quansah the ref was only shown 3 slow-mo replays. for balo the ref was shown 3x slow-mo then 2x normal speed replays
@AJW_ESQ@AdamCrafton_ they are allowed to use both slow-mo and normal speed (IFAB gives general guidance for what situation) - in this case, they did show both.
https://t.co/Ea66MOEIny
@davejsports I just rewatched the broadcast again. They first loop it three times using slow motion (this would be consistent with isolating point of contact - factual). Then they loop it three times at normal speed (to determine intensity). Textbook VAR procedure.
@SecurityMaestro@RobKeyworth@jasonrmcintyre for england the ref was only shown 3 slow-mo replays - not sure what you were watching 😂 and the ifab rules don’t specify the order. for balogun both slow-mo and normal speed were shown 🤷♂️
@davejsports I just rewatched the broadcast again. They first loop it three times using slow motion (this would be consistent with isolating point of contact - factual). Then they loop it three times at normal speed (to determine intensity). Textbook VAR procedure.
@caseylee1717@DiceElDani slow-mo is allowed (ifab law provides general guidelines of when to use it, but nowhere does it say it can’t be used) — watch it back: the VAR showed slow-mo to establish point of physical contact (fact), then showed normal speed to show ‘intensity’ 🤷♂️
https://t.co/Ea66MOEIny
@davejsports I just rewatched the broadcast again. They first loop it three times using slow motion (this would be consistent with isolating point of contact - factual). Then they loop it three times at normal speed (to determine intensity). Textbook VAR procedure.