Extremhögerns senaste hot mot mänskligheten: luftkonditionering 😂
Man måste ändå beundra den politiska komiken i SVT:s senaste rapportering från Frankrike. Huvudnyheten är alltså att Marine Le Pen vill hjälpa det franska folket genom att låta staten subventionera luftkonditionering till skolor, äldreboenden, sjukhus och kollektivtrafiken när det blir varmt ute. Ett helt normalt, omtänksamt och praktiskt förslag för att underlätta vardagen för vanliga medborgare. Men eftersom förslaget kommer från vad SVT noga påpekar är "ytterhögern" drabbas vänstern och miljöetablissemanget av panik. De kan ju absolut inte låta högern framstå som de som faktiskt hjälper folket. Så vad gör de? Jo, de tar in en korrespondent i SVT som förklarar att förslaget sågas av forskare eftersom det är "kontraproduktivt" att släppa ut värmen på gatan, för då blir gatan varmare! Ja, du läste rätt. Man kan alltså inte ge skolbarn och gamlingar på äldreboenden lite svalka eftersom asfalten på gatan utanför i så fall riskerar att bli kränkt av 0,1 grad extra strålvärme.
Det här visar exakt hur vänsterns ideologiska reflexer får dem att framstå som totalt galna inför helt vanligt folk. När högern kliver fram med pragmatiska och förnuftiga lösningar för att göra vardagen trevligare under sommarmånaderna, blir vänsterns enda reaktion att få panik och såga förslaget. De är så ideologiskt förblindade att de hellre nekar folk helt vanlig vardagskomfort än att unna medborgarna lite svalka om idén kommer från fel politiskt håll. Det är precis därför högern knappt behöver driva någon valrörelse längre, de får ju öppet mål så fort etablissemanget öppnar munnen.
Tror ni vänstern någonsin kommer koppla ihop sina egna reflexer mot sunt förnuft med varför de tappar väljare i hela Europa?
Remember the headlines last week?
"12 extreme right-wing terrorists arrested for plot against an Islamic event"?
12 locals, including an 82yr old man were arrested and detained under special powers for a week for "daring" to investigate wtf was going on at Shrubland hall.
It turned out to be a Ijtima gathering, which are banned across the Muslim world for being "dangerous".
The police have quietly updated tonight:
“We have made extensive enquiries, but at this time, we have found no evidence to support anyone being charged with any offences linked to the alleged threat".
They raided all their homes and scoured all their devices hoping to find anything remotely "terrorist" and couldn't.
Absolute disgrace.
Former British Prime Minister Liz Truss explains how the Deep State, NGO activists and globalists have captured the state and the media, and are destroying the West.
Just a few years ago, The Times attempted to smear me for raising these very concerns:
"Mike Fairclough, the head teacher of West Rise Junior School, spoke about a plan by 'globalists' to disempower people and take away their freedoms."
It's remarkable how quickly ideas once dismissed as conspiracy theories have entered mainstream political debate.
The globalist agenda must be exposed, confronted and defeated.
Detta är firandet av den shiamuslimska Ashurahögtiden i Malmö 2026. Oavsett hur man ser på utvecklingen är det svårt att blunda för hur genomgripande Sverige har förändrats under de senaste decennierna.
Not only has @elonmusk saved X, but he has also saved freedom of speech in Europe.
We are lucky to have a giant like him on our side. No ifs, no buts.
He could be doing a LOT of other things with his time, energy and money.
Ser att många delar den här. Som gammal Malmöit kan jag bekräfta att detta är Norra Grängesbergsgatan. Den progressiva vänstern har under åratal hyllat miljön här, bland annat för att det är billigt att äta och köpa nya däck till bilen: https://t.co/zRM7wXNNLp
Jag är dock inte övertygad om att alla här vet vad F-skatt och arbetsgivaransvar är.
Rekordmånga gäster utkastade från Liseberg | Göteborgs-Posten https://t.co/cIErLZYRqB Det kan handla om hotfullt beteende mot andra gäster eller anställda på Liseberg, brottsliga handlingar, ordningsstörningar eller andra säkerhetsrisker.
Hände mycket sällan förr.
Nu vardag...
🚨Hope Not Hate has taken over the government.🚨
Meet Alison Phillips – their board member and former Mirror editor – is now Andy Burnham’s Director of Transition.
She’s “very proud” to support the group that smears anyone questioning mass migration or Britain’s demographic replacement as “haters.”
Her words: “We don’t want children growing up hating people for being different.”
On diversity she wants to “widen the diversity of ethnicity” in newsrooms because “the British media has a lot of work to do to improve representation of black, Asian and minority ethnic people.”
Expect faster open borders, forced demographic change, and more attacks on those on the right .
Hope Not Hate is now steering the ship.
Ursula von der Leyen has confirmed that everyone in the EU will need to use the EU's app for identity authentication before being able to access or post on social media websites.
🇪🇺 As an expert in online child safety, I am here to expose the misinformation and misdirection in von der Leyen's statements.
Today von der Leyen said:
"This is not about whether children can access social media, it is about whether social media can access our children".
💡The first part is true. This isn't about children. It's about surveillance and combating political dissent. A state that can't control its own citizens is more dangerous than a state rife with criminals. The second part is a PR soundbite that politicians are using like a campaign slogan straight out of 1984.
🇪🇺"The question is no longer if children face risks online, but what can we do to give children a safer start online".
💡No. You can't give children a "safer start" online any more than you can offline. In the offline world, the government doesn't enforce curfews or ban children from entering liquor stores, bars or restaurants. That's a parent's responsibility. The digital world should be no different.
🇪🇺"The age verification app is one of the tools to get it done".
💡This is a contradiction because she also said "It won't be foolproof".
🇪🇺"It's easy to use, it is privacy preserving and it is open source".
💡The app was compromised as soon as it was released. "Privacy-preserving" age verification is an oxymoron. You can't verify a person's age without verifying their identity. Where or how that age is shared afterwards is irrelevant.
🇪🇺"This is basically about putting back the power into the hands of parents".
💡More from 1984. The EU is doing the opposite. Parents are having their authority stripped by politicians who think they know better. Many parents are capable and unaffected by peer pressure, and they know how to use parental controls to block any app classified as 13+. Some teens are safe, their parents trust them, and the state has no business overruling that trust.
🇪🇺"We don't give our children keys to the car before they have their licence"
💡Comparing an app to a car is a false equivalence used to justify mass surveillance. Governments don't decide when a young person is ready for car keys, guardians do.
💡Forcing every adult and child into a biometric checkpoint just to use an app or website is not licensing drivers. It's the state seizing everyone's keys, locking the garage, and forcing every driver to ask a private company for permission to take a drive.
💡 This is a gross, unethical overreach that strips authority from parents while imposing state sanctioned identity verification on every adult who doesn't even have a child.
💡Additionally, people who pass a test, obtain a licence and drive a car aren't forced to use an app to constantly authenticate their suitability to drive.
🇪🇺"We do not let them buy alcohol until they are legally allowed"
💡False equivalence. We don't force every person to show ID at a shopping mall entrance just because a few people might buy alcohol with a meal at a restaurant. Some parents are okay with their 12 year-old going to the mall with friends while others aren't. Either way, it's their choice. Whatever irresponsible decisions some parents might make, every adult in the country shouldn't be forced to pay the price.
🇪🇺"It won't be foolproof"
💡This is all the proof we need to show that the EU and every government know that banning social media for teens won't protect them. When pressed by journalists about VPNs being used to circumvent a ban, politicians always state the ban isn't a silver bullet and will take time. The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan went as far as to say "we know it's not the solution".
💡Either age verification works, or it doesn't. As a technical expert in this space, I can tell you there are no additional steps to take and no progress to be made. Either the approach does what it is supposed to do, or it's not fit for purpose. If they claim a bulletproof solution is coming, it can only mean one thing. They intend to ban or restrict VPNs to people who verify their identity.
🇪🇺"It will take time to invite the cultural change that is already taking shape in our society, just as it took time to outlaw drink driving, just as it took time to use seatbelts in the cars. Great change never happens overnight, but when it comes to our safety it is always worth it".
💡Comparing a social media ban and age verification to seatbelts is a completely broken analogy. Seatbelts are a safety feature that protects children while allowing them to travel in a car. A ban doesn't give kids a seatbelt. It kicks them out of the car entirely.
💡Instead of supporting parents who want to guide their own children through the digital world, this heavy-handed law strips away parental authority by banning the apps and websites that many parents are perfectly fine with and actively monitor.
💡Furthermore, enforcing these bans requires biometric age verification, which means forcing millions of adult citizens to scan their IDs, faces or credit cards just to browse the internet. That isn't a common-sense traffic law.
💡It's a digital checkpoint on every street. True safety means teaching kids how to navigate the digital world safely with real guardrails and parental guidance, not burning down digital spaces for everyone under the guise of protection.
🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to ban teens from social media so every person is forced to verify their identity before they can read, share or post anything online. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous content.
🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to enforce "Chat Control" so every app has to monitor everything people say privately inside it, including apps with end-to-end encryption. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous criminals.
💡Where this ends
🇪🇺 "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever".
George Orwell, 1984.
Inget att bry sig om. Bara muslimer som tränar med målet att ta över - med socialisternas och liberalernas hjälp förstås. Så bara skrolla vidare, det blir säkert bra det här.
Moderaternas parlamentariker i EU, Tomas Tobé, har röstat för Chat Control som innebär massövervakning av EU-medborgares digitala meddelanden.
Finns det någon från @moderaterna som ställer upp på en debatt med någon av oss i @medborgsamling i ämnet?
Vi har skrivit, talat, debatterat och även demonstrerat mot dessa långtgående förslag sedan 2022.
Detta är väldigt långtgående förslag som har ett klart allmänintresse.
Är det omöjligt att få till en debatt? Kanske även med @tomastobe?
En 45-åring 4-barnspappa blir ihjälslagen på en badplats när han ber några ligister att plocka upp skräpet efter sig.
Jag frågar AI om SVT rapporterat om detta i sina nyhetssändningar och får svaret: ”Det finns inga uppgifter om att Aktuellt eller Rapport har nämnt händelsen i sina huvudsakliga nyhetssändningar”..
Så det bedöms alltså inte ha tillräckligt nyhetsvärde nyhetsvärde för svenska folket…
Public Service….
🇪🇺🇫🇷 This is peak irony: former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton, who once bragged about how they'd managed to get Romania's election results annulled because it didn't go the way the EU wanted, is now warning Elon about "meddling" in France's elections
According to him, if the X algorithm favors one candidate (which it won't because it's balanced and open-sourced) it would be illegal
Hey Thierry, how is it legal to apply political pressure to a country to get them to annul the results of their own elections?
For context, after the results were annulled, U.S intelligence agencies proved there had been no Russian influence over Romania's elections
Clearly, there was EU influence though.
Writer: Ian