Peter Slayton 🦬

Assistant Director of Media Pitching for @hillsdale via @hillsdalepr. Opinions my own.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@DLoesch Want to talk to an expert on the show Monday? I've got a professor seeing it this weekend. He's a Homer expert and can give it to you straight.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@DavidMastio Cadiwampus.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@lymanstoneky Genesis 9:3 diet FTW.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

Common dog problems in a Facebook group: Help! We are treating our dog like a human but he responds like a dog. How do we get him to stop that and be human?

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@becomelutheran @DarthHarryson @MattWhitmanTMBH still effective, years later! The Gospel is like that. :-D

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Thanks to @SKDoubleDub33 for working with audio and music on these videos.

For anyone in Candace's audience still reading:

You've been trained to treat "I have a question about this evidence" as equivalent to "this evidence has been debunked." Those aren't the same. A question about metadata doesn't cancel a handwritten confession.

Evidence accumulates. That's how analysis works. You start with a question, you gather data, and when the data answers the question, you update. Sometimes the answer isn't what you wanted. You update anyway. That's the price of being serious.

What Candace does is the opposite. Evidence arrives and gets replaced by a new question. The new question becomes a substitute to make the previous answer not count and gives fresh license to invent conspiracy theories.

"He wasn't there." DNA says he was. "OK but the DNA could be planted." By whom? "The feds." Where's the evidence of federal involvement? "Why won't they release the metadata?"

Every answer generates a new question. Every new question replaces the last answer. At no point in this sequence did anyone say: "That changes what I think.” Israel is always blamed, and Candace is always right.

"Fedslop" doesn't mean fake. It means: evidence I have been trained to not engage with. First you reject the evidence. Then you reject the question. Then you reject the people who read the evidence out loud. The last move when you have no more argument: calling people you disagree with Jews or Zionists so you can keep rejecting reality and clinging to that Israel killed Charlie.

Data-driven means the data can tell you you're wrong. If you’ve built a system where everything is just fresh opportunity to poke more holes, you're not doing analysis or critical thinking. You’re simply a fool professing oneself to be wise.

THREAD END.

[Benjamin Domenech @bdomenech]

I asked @DataRepublican: There are clearly a lot of people obsessed with the idea that Candace and her supporters have uncovered some vast political conspiracy. If you were sitting next to someone who thought that way at a local bar, what would you say to them?

She responded: I’d tell them that Charlie Kirk changed my life. He gave me a platform when nobody knew who I was. He stood behind me when I was doxxed by Rolling Stone. I owe him more than I’ll ever be able to repay.

Then I’d buy them a drink and tell them I get it. We’ve all been lied to by people in power, and the instinct to distrust official narratives is earned.

But finding the truth isn’t making a conscious decision to follow a different narrative to the prevailing one. It’s about following the data, the actual data, no matter where it goes.

The data shows that many institutions are failing us and are taking escalating actions to maintain their legitimacy by coercion. That’s true. But the data also shows that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk, and that’s becoming more obvious every day the court proceedings are televised.

Read the whole interview:
https://t.co/JUC0jpClad

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@JobobTaeleifi I'm not even sure you are a real person.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@JoshAmyT @data_republican @DataRepublican If that what is actually going on here, don't you think the defense will bring that up? That's my point.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@JoshAmyT @data_republican @DataRepublican If this is actually a compelling piece of evidence that proves Tyler did not do it, I look forward to his defense bringing it up as evidence in trial. If they don't, then it isn't the compelling evidence you think it is.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello Mrs. Owens,

You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk."

He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it.

You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it.

You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days.

You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater.

You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu.

You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name.

And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely.

Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him.

So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath.

Every single one failed.

I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow.

The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts.

I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@JobobTaeleifi I touched water once and it was so cold I couldn't feel the wet. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN???

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@JobobTaeleifi Feelings don't care about your facts.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@bdomenech @MattBelloni @netflix Perhaps she picked it because it's the least known/favorite and therefore she can do pretty much anything she wants with the source materials and few will complain.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@LutheranAnswers Tater tots.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@PastorSharp England vs Norway would be an excellent game.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@GudimJason I told you sipping loudly would one day get you in trouble.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

@SubstituteS23 That's what the small catechism is for. It's the discernment guide as you go through the great books.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

Good morning, America. Mount Rushmore is looking good today.

[Peter Slayton 🦬 @peterrslayton]

Picture of the day. America's first national monument was in fine form today.
.
.
.
.
.
Devil's Tower
America 250
Freedom 250
National parks