@real_mahalingam It is unfathomable that the median material standard of living owing to the value of produced goods and services will be anywhere near America in 1960, regardless of what metric depicts what, though with a serious capitalist reform it might be possible in a generation.
Cribbing about anything the British did (other than their cursing us with democracy) is just trite boomer cope that it would all have been okay if only for the weavers, or our textiles, and in fact things today are Good Enough — “such are things; that’s how we are as a people; what can one do; chalta hai”.
For the most part, the worst racists who hate us, that Jayant is around, are a lot better and a lot less evil than people who think “it is okay”.
Indeed the British are to be loathed, for leaving India. Or more precisely leaving us in the hands of those who hate our ritual tradition, subject to the rule of the “masses”. They had no right to so hand over the administration of this land.
Otherwise, while one might have quibbles, the manner of their government wasn’t necessary salutary but more or less appropriate. Of course you may tax and govern the trade of a population you administer so long as it isn’t rapacious.
It is the onset of democracy that brought us to the place that not even the most lecherous and thuggish prince could have, which is shackled to an irrevocable meme that can’t be overcome without Caesar.
@pexabit@Ubermensch_male@JayantBhandari5 The point is to do this,not only their views on the matter should change,but also of the world in this regards.. the world where "civilising" of people was done is left behind long back..heck at one point even us Indians, including the elites were getting civilized by the British
You’re all factually correct, of course including, @JayantBhandari5. But one must have hope that India’s presently absent elite take up the task it abdicated, of civilizing its people and running a nation, and for that must have a genuinely positive feeling for the qualities of this elite and its people, that it is a diamond in the rough.
One must at least believe that were he an Urban Ceasar, he could build a country worthy of its forefathers.
I’d love to admire him, but there’s no honor in despair and despondency, and it leads him to arrive at generally incorrect conclusions of the world which is a shame because so much of what he says might be right. This is the first quantum fragment of an inkling of good sense from him, in a long time.
I’d love to admire him, but there’s no honor in despair and despondency, and it leads him to arrive at generally incorrect conclusions of the world which is a shame because so much of what he says might be right. This is the first quantum fragment of an inkling of good sense from him, in a long time.
Speaking as a south indian i think there’s absolutely nothing wrong with someone wanting to share a room with only “north indian vegetarians”. What exactly is concerning about people having preferences.
(having said that i am completely opposed to going to another country and discriminating against its people but I have no problem with discriminating against weirdo Indian freaks)
@appumon4K You’re a 28 year old whose whole identity is eating beef and cheering for a sportsball team comprised of foreigners who would correctly mock your existence. You don’t have a wife, a family, in all likelihood will die alone, and yet have the temerity to mock your moral betters.
@appumon4K To be very clear, so long as they’re only discriminating against adharmic Indians such as yourself, and not native white Britons, I don’t actually care. You deserve to be discriminated against, you deserve to be mocked, you deserve the pogroms that come your way.
In the movie, these retards keep bleating about Radcliffe’s “carelessness” but curiously don’t present some obviously superior alternative where the ethnic cleansing would have been mostly peaceful, that could have been arrived at had Radcliffe randomly taken more trains hither and thither.
Or something.
Surely the thing to do would be codifying clear orthographic standards in a lightly-enhanced Latin script, with an emphasis on things like availability of versatile font families, standardized spellings, figuring out how English punctuation is best imported to maximize readability, etc.?
Ataturk was the only nationalist remotely serious about this. Most linguistic parochialism is actually just an exercise in preserving various pidgins, whose only literary traditions have long since died. They’re not serious about scripts because the language in question is inevitably an oral pidgin with a literacy rate of zero since there is nothing to be literate in.
Okay but a few oddball tribes like yours interspersed here and there, which matrilineality by the way comes hand-in-hand with all sorts of absurd practices, doesn’t really change that actual, orthodox Hinduism is plainly patriarchal. It’s neither here nor there that there are lots of weirdo customs on the subcontinent.
The fact you’re citing AI slop on historical figures as having “attained Moksha” is very funny. Is this even remotely falsifiable? Was it remotely falsifiable to anyone *even at the time*?
Sorry but if you get married to someone and the next day she claims she’s married to Lord Krishna, that is called mental illness. In the real world.
Where in the Vedas does something clearly analogous to the modern practice of surnames/“family names” even show up in a way that reveals the women kept hers? By the way, what is the woman’s surname anyway? Keeping track of families isn’t a “British” thing. Families there and here are tagged by the Husband - if the meaning of gotra and, any part of the Orthodox Hindu sacrament of marriage were unclear to you.