@[email protected]

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@bodowartke Wäre mastodon eine Alternative?

[Colin O'Flynn @colinoflynn]

Finally ran the nice @debirdify app so will give Mastodon a try for a while now. Currently at [email protected] - hopefully see you there, otherwise we'll all meet again in the virtual post-apocalyptic twitter.

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

Finally. Now I can leave 🐦

[FakeIACR @FakeIACR]

Despite popular advice we will address the elephant in the room: We are now on Mastodon! @[email protected]
(as much as possible those accounts will be entangled... except when they won't)

[FluxFingers @fluxfingers]

🍷🍣Hacklu 22, Fine Hacking Edition🍷🍣

🏆 https://t.co/1aKz3YRRmb 2022 has started 🏆
The first set of challenges is released, hack hard!

Good luck everyone!

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@4ndre3sser @CryptoOrrDun @roeslpa Why would you need more journals to compensate more submissions? The journal is not limited to conference schedules or printed books or whatever. So you could simply increase the editorial board.

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@4ndre3sser @CryptoOrrDun @roeslpa Setting up the NJ to then afterwards transition the area workshop/conferences is not a good idea imo - that would make the NJ somehow obsolete then, so we should omit the effort in the first place.

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@tomhillenbrand Can recommend L. A. Noire 👌

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@raphaelrobert Do you have an (openly accessible) example for a good (detailed enough) threat model?

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@DorotheaKolossa @tschfflr Pasteten, gefüllt mit gesprengtem Huhn

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@shalabhj @0xcharlie @nudehaberdasher Yes. Actually, already the very first talk mentioned it 😅

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@martinralbrecht But also: I'm not pursuing an academic career, so it's not important for me to prove my track record.

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@martinralbrecht I'm a W in that order, but tbh, I don't mind being part of the et al. - I find it much more annoying to have arguments about who should be the first author and thus like the "just alphabetical" approach.
If there are more than a few authors, it's also not practical to name all.

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@sh_rasoolzadeh Yeah, congrats 🥳

[Alexander May @AlexanderMay10]

PhD position opening in Quantum Cryptanalysis, joint supervision with @michael_quantum, become part of the great QSI Marie-Curie ITN with fantastic researchers like @cmajenz, @cr_yp_to, @quantum_bat, @theoryamsterdam.
https://t.co/HE4mLrbFKm

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@terryip @jzvw 👌
Worked for me. Mine seems fine 😂

[Abdullah Talayhan @talayhan_a]

(1/8) I am very happy to announce https://t.co/m0YHFEIZgW, a non-commercial platform to discuss and ask questions about Cryptology ePrint Archive papers. It aims to accumulate knowledge around papers in cryptography.

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@cronokirby @kaepora Nice Post, thanks!

BTW, link to ABHKLR20 points to GHP18, too.

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@kaepora Is it really more comfortable? I never had the whish to raise my keyboard in that way 🤔

[@[email protected] @pfasante]

@kaepora https://t.co/bdcthkVoGh seems to be the click-able link for laptops