pgwtquit 🛸

nothing in me

[笑鸥smile @_7t]

大家现在找工作，除了用boss直聘

还用前程无忧（51job）、猎聘吗？？

[苏乐 @ai_suxiaole]

为什么中国程序员技术不差
英语却总是短板

这个问题作者认真研究过

写成了 GitHub 项目
GitHub 50k ⭐️，
程序员写给程序员的英语指南

🔗 https://t.co/5gOHVsBhsu

[David Hoffman @TrustlessState]

https://t.co/5EOn4y2pdx

[vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin]

Some of my perspective on where the @ethereumfndn is going.

First of all, this is only my own view. The board is not just me, and I have no extra special powers on the board that the other board members do not. @aerugoettinea is the one executing much of this transition. My input has been largely on technical questions. The board is in the process of expanding, and my own power within the org will continue to decrease, which is honestly what I want.

The 2025 era brought many important improvements to EF and its ability to execute. Many issues were resolved, and EF continues to benefit from its improved efficiency and greater focus on concrete goals to this day. And so with those problems resolved, early this year, the largest remaining hole that I perceived was something different nagging at me: I would regularly spot people saying things like "vitalik says these beautiful things about ethereum needing to be decentralized, and have privacy, and be a sanctuary technology, but why do the EF's actions not reflect that?"

Now, you may have been hearing something different. You may not have been sensing a feeling of crisis at all, and maybe were hearing people saying that finally we were taking execution and BD seriously and the main task for us is to keep going that way and be even better and faster. Then probably there is genuine difference between you and me, in what kinds of criticism I take most seriously, and what kinds of critics through their criticism are most able to make me feel pain.

As an analogy, let's briefly switch over to a different domain.

One belief you can have about Google is that it is a success story, and has brought a lot of good to humanity in organizing the world's information. Another belief you can have about Google is that they had a beautiful idealistic beginning, but at some point the corruption of mainstream corporate attitudes seeped in, and they slowly bit by bit completely abandoned the "don't be evil" slogan.

My belief on Google specifically is probably somewhere between the two. BUT, if you had taken me back in time to ~2008, and offered me a button to press to make Google one or two standard deviations more "dogmatic", eg. give Richard Stallman permanent veto power over some key policies, I would immediately press it.

Why? Because a choice for one company is not a choice for the world, or even one country. Google existed and exists in the context of a technology industry generally drifting away from early idealistic don't-be-evil roots and toward greed for financial gain, totalizing visions of accelerated superintelligence, infiltration by sociopaths, and craven capitulation to (or worse, active participation in) government pressure for ideological control, surveillance and war. And so *one company* doing something different, positioning itself to be what George Bernard Shaw calls the Unreasonable Man, resisting the trend of the times, would have been better for freedom, balance of power and stability of society as a whole, than *all* large companies bending to dominant trends. This is a part of my version of pluralism.

This line of thinking is not just mine, but I also is not too far off from what Aya and others had in mind with the Mandate.

Now how does this all get to the role of the EF?

EF is not a "center of Ethereum", rather EF is "one node, with a defined purpose, alongside other nodes". We've always said that the EF should be the latter, but many in the Ethereum ecosystem (and even within the EF) wanted us to be the former. Now, we are taking action to ensure that we will be the latter.

This is particularly important because EF is a limited organization, with limited resources and limited organizational capacity. The EF has only ~0.16% of all ETH (less than many other individual ETH holders), whereas among other blockchains it's common for "the central foundation" to have 10-50%. Fiscally, the EF was originally designed to fulfill a limited work scope defined in the token sale docs and other pre-launch materials (building the chain software; getting through Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis, Serenity), which was fully completed in 2022; it was not designed to be an eternal steward.

And so today, the EF is choosing to use its remaining resources to pursue longevity over breadth (yes, this means we sell less ETH). The EF focuses *specifically* on those activities critical to the success of ethereum as a censorship/capture-resistant, open, private and secure system, that would not happen otherwise. This means making hard choices, and in some cases even activities that we highly approve of and people that we highly respect becoming outside of the EF. People of great technical talent, public respect and even alignment with the mission and CROPS being outside of the EF is in fact necessary if we want important tasks to be able to attract outside capital. This also means the EF taking opinionated stands culturally.

This is all intended in cooperation with all other parts of ethereum. We recognize that many other parts of the ethereum world highly respect CROPS and related values. But highly respecting is not the same as choosing to specialize and totally dedicate to a domain (Compare in a different domain: I think reducing animal cruelty is important, and I like vegan food, but am not full unconditional vegan myself)

EF is still in a transition period, and we expect its new long-term form to stabilize over the next few months. What are the guiding principles of this new form? Again, I am only one person, but I can give my answer from a technical perspective (there are also critical non-technical aspects).

At the core, *Ethereum must be impressive*. We are living in an age of highly intelligent AI and all kinds of other technological acceleration. "Status quo EVM, with a hard fork or two a year to optimize for short-term needs of users" is not interesting.

To some, "impressive" means: 250ms latency and 1M TPS. I think Ethereum trying to go that route is a mistake. Being as fast and as scalable as possible, and only a small epsilon more decentralized than the others, is a route to mediocrity, and if we try it we will lose.

I think Ethereum should scale. But I think Ethereum should strive the hardest to be deeply impressive in a different dimension: the CROPS dimension. This means things like:

* Provably bug-free Ethereum. This is a goal that all cybersecurity researchers would have thought is absurd and impossible, up until roughly 6 months ago. Now, it's on the cusp of being possible, thanks to AI-assisted formal verification. So we should be frontrunners in doing this.

* Available chain consensus. Ethereum is, and with lean consensus will cotninue to be, the ONLY chain that has both (i) traditional-BFT style properties that it's safe under asynchrony up to a high level of fault tolerance, and (ii) the bitcoin PoW-style property that under synchrony it's safe up to 49% attackers. As far as I can tell, literally no other chain has this or is planning for it; bitcoin goes for (ii) only and most other chains go for (i) only. Some will remember I fought hard for this, Unreasonably insisting that it is not OK for ethereum to rely on social consensus and hard forks to rescue ethereum from 34% of nodes going offline. It's OK for chains like hyperledger, bnb, solana, tempo, etc. It's not OK for bitcoin or ethereum or eg. zcash.

* Intermediary minimization. The fact that smart contract wallets, protocols like railgun, etc have to send transactions through intermediaries to get included onchain is honestly embarrassing, and it's a constant point of fragility. Hence the work on FOCIL and EIP-8141 (and 7701 and years of work before) to make transaction sending intermediary-minimized with public mempool and strong inclusion properties, in a truly general-purpose way, that covers not just eg. secp256r1, but also privacy protocols and much more. Kohaku is pushing intermediary minimization at the user layer, pulling Ethereum away from the dystopian status quo world where our wallets don't even verify the chain, send our private data out to a dozen third-party servers, and toward a brighter CROPS future.

Some of these goals are Unreasonable - maybe Ethereum would be "fine" getting only 50% of the way - what if we depend on intermediaries, but make it easy to switch? But going 50% of the way would not make Ethereum Deeply Impressive in the CROPS way. So we push for 100%.

Fortunately all these goals are compatible with high TPS, this is a major focus of research (esp. on scaling the state). Well-designed L2s can also help, especially L2s optimized for specific applications (eg. high-volume trading, privacy...). These goals are even compatible with significantly lower slot times, thanks to Raul's work on erasure-coded P2P, and many other optimizations.

The most high-value "product" of the ethereum blockchain, financially speaking, is ETH the asset. Ethereum secures $250 billion of ETH. The types of properties of Ethereum that I mentioned above are very good for ETH the asset. Nearly 90% of my net worth is in ETH, and most of the remainder is ~$40m of onchain fiat of which every dollar has already been allocated for some open-source biotech or software or hardware initiative. That said, there are aspects of supporting ETH the asset - *necessary* aspects even - that are outside the scope of the EF. This is where we need other heroes (some of whom hold more ETH than the EF does) to step in and help. EF has been recently thinking more about how it will relate to other such organizations, and give them needed initial support.

EF will be a smaller ship than in previous years, a more opinionated one - in some cases more opinionated in ways that might be difficult to comprehend - but a longer-lasting one, and one suited to making sure that ethereum brings something meaningful to the world. We are grateful to all those inside and outside the EF who are helping to make this happen.

[炼金叔叔 @AirdropAlchemis]

一个低调的perp dex项目完成了3000万美元融资

由Foresight领投，对就是那个web3新闻门户的母公司，叔今天才发现Foresight投资了这么多头部的项目，比如APT、Ton、Sei、Lombard、MYX……

项目名叫做PopDEX，相对比较早期，目前看到正在招募内测交易员，可以去看看。

[Murphy @Murphychen888]

BTC 定投成本的安全边界

定投，是很多小伙伴会采用的一种即容易做心理建设，又能降低持仓焦虑的“傻瓜式”实用性策略。

但是，当BTC从6w反弹到8w，我们还要不要坚持定投？把成本控制在怎样的范围是才是安全的？

今天我们就来聊聊这个话题。

在上一篇推文中，我们有总结过：每当“投资者信心指数”掉入“水下”，即进入熊市；回到水上，即走出深熊。

我们假设从“进入熊市”开始定投，到“走出深熊”结束。那么复盘过去3轮周期，分别得到如下数据👇：

1⃣ 定投周期：2018.2.3 - 2019.4.2
总天数：423 天；
最高买入价：$11,480；
最低买入价：$3,242；
定投平均成本约为：$6,420；
最终牛市高点为：$69,000；

2⃣ 定投周期：2021.12.11 - 2023.1.17
总天数：402 天；
最高买入价：$50,803；
最低买入价：$15,599；
定投平均成本约为：$27,350；
最终牛市高点为：$126,000；

3⃣ 定投周期：2025.10.21 - 2026.5.12
总天数：203 天；
最高买入价：$103,450；
最低买入价：$62,180；
定投平均成本约为：$81,650；
最终牛市高点为 ??????；

因此，我们可以这样理解：

假设有人在这市场最恐慌的203天中坚持买入，那么现在他的平均成本大致就在 $81,000 左右。

而你的平成本只要不高于这个价格，拉长时间看，可以说是绝对安全的。当然，如果可以，那肯定是越低越好。

因为市场不可能永远都处在“恐慌”情绪下；当转入“乐观”情绪后，对BTC的定价一定也会高于“恐慌时期的平均成本价”。

剩下的就交给时间吧，时间不会辜负我们的！

[炼金叔叔 @AirdropAlchemis]

更新一下近3个月没有变化过的「叔叔项目跟踪表」

1️⃣标橙字体项目是最近新增的
2️⃣每个分享的项目均有教程文章链接
3️⃣老规矩自取：https://t.co/efoEndF51y

叔虽然天天抽象，但项目还是在做啊，这是我在web3翻盘的希望，不能丢🥹

[0x独眼👁️ @0xduyan]

🚀币安U理财续期了，想申购的尽快申购，虽然单户额度砍半了，但稳定8%收益的交易所理财不多了，况且还算Alpha余额分

⚖️U仍然可以考虑去ListaDAO借，目前依旧负利率补贴，还不知道怎么操作的朋友可以看这篇文章https://t.co/dl7oAokNfV

♻️U简单省事稳定，但如果愿意折腾的，还是要玩USD1整体收益更高，我主页置顶文章和最近推文已经写了很多USD1的思路和实操，如果这周有空，我再写一下USD1最新的搭配杠杆玩法和预估收益

🚪当然，如果不局限币安的话，Gate的GHO理财有16%也是很香的，虽然单户限额5000u，但由于目前多证件（身份证/护照/驾照）是独立核算，比较容易搞多户，不过一定要注意兑换滑点问题，暂时用OKX钱包，提供方选择Uni，滑点锁死0.01%，然后用USDC兑换相对磨损小一些，但注意这个理财赎回需要2天的

🤔另外，要不是刀哥说，还真没发现U和USDC有锚定机制，不过看了下，U申购RWUSD是简单，但RWUSD赎回USDC，T+3到账，还要0.05%手续费，感觉U/USDC跌到0.9990以下才有套利空间

📊最后，再安利一下刀哥@Web3Daoge1 和Barker @BarkerMoneyX 的理财日报，每天总结理财热点，很有参考价值

[小C | 🔶BNB @0xXIAOc]

用币安钱包插件兑换一笔 ≥50美元的Alpha代币，获得5个Alpha积分
活动时间：5月14日08:00至 5月28日07:59 UTC+8
实测磨损约 0.05U，分数次日加上

操作方式：
1⃣电脑下载币安钱包插件，下载链接：https://t.co/5pvkakaZkF
2⃣扫码登录，选择 →【兑换】，兑换代币选择OPG，记得输入以下的合约地址确认一遍。
代币合约：0x5feccd17c393caf1001d18164236a37e731fcb9d
3⃣完成一笔金额大于50U的兑换，完成任务

注意：5月14日（明天早上）8点开始
绑定我的币安钱包邀请码：XIAOCC （手续费减免30%）
一键绑定传送门：https://t.co/QsVycXKcRQ

[大宇 @BTCdayu]

https://t.co/ARVJotTdyU

[Andrew Ng @AndrewYNg]

There will be no AI jobpocalypse.

The story that AI will lead to massive unemployment is stoking unnecessary fear. AI — like any other technology — does affect jobs, but telling overblown stories of large-scale unemployment is irresponsible and damaging. Let’s put a stop to it.

I’ve expressed skepticism about the jobpocalypse in previous posts. I’m glad to see that the popular press is now pushing back on this narrative. The image below features some recent headlines.

Software engineering is the sector most affected by AI tools, as coding agents race ahead. Yet hiring of software engineers remains strong! So while there are examples of AI taking away jobs, the trends strongly suggest the net job creation is vastly greater than the job destruction — just like earlier waves of technology. Further, despite all the exciting progress in AI, the U.S. unemployment rate remains a healthy 4.3%.

Why is the AI jobpocalypse narrative so popular? For one thing, frontier AI labs have a strong incentive to tell stories that make AI technology sound more powerful. At their most extreme, they promote science-fiction scenarios of AI “taking over” and causing human extinction. If a technology can replace many employees, surely that technology must be very valuable!

Also, a lot of SaaS software companies charge around $100-$1000 per user/year. But if an AI company can replace an employee who makes $100,000 — or make them 50% more productive — then charging even $10,000 starts to look reasonable. By anchoring not to typical SaaS prices but to salaries of employees, AI companies can charge a lot more.

Additionally, businesses have a strong incentive to talk about layoffs as if they were caused by AI. After all, talking about how they’re using AI to be far more productive with fewer staff makes them look smart. This is a better message than admitting they overhired during the pandemic when capital was abundant due to low interest rates and a massive government financial stimulus.

To be clear, I recognize that AI is causing a lot of people’s work to change. This is hard. This is stressful. (And to some, it can be fun.) I empathize with everyone affected. At the same time, this is very different from predicting a collapse of the job market.

Societies are capable of telling themselves stories for years that have little basis in reality and lead to poor society-wide decision making. For example, fears over nuclear plant safety led to under-investment in nuclear power. Fears of the “population bomb” in the 1960s led countries to implement harsh policies to reduce their populations. And worries about dietary fat led governments to promote unhealthy high-sugar diets for decades.

Now that mainstream media is openly skeptical about the jobpocalypse, I hope these stories will start to lose their teeth (much like fears of AI-driven human extinction have).

Contrary to the predictions of an AI jobpocalypse, I predict the opposite: There will be an AI jobapalooza! AI will lead to a lot more good AI engineering jobs, and I’m also optimistic about the future of the overall job market. What AI engineers do will be different from traditional software engineering, and many of these jobs will be in businesses other than traditional large employers of developers. In non-AI roles, too, the skills needed will change because of AI. That makes this a good time to encourage more people to become proficient in AI, and make sure they’re ready for the different but plentiful jobs of the future!

[Original text in The Batch newsletter.]

[DeFi Teddy @DeFiTeddy2020]

除了芯片/能源/存储

还有待爆发赛道哪些可以关注？

AI networking/数据中心/服务器整机 或许可以关注

[Biteye @BiteyeCN]

https://t.co/6k41zYsR13

[吴说区块链 @wublockchain12]

《我在加密世界用 Vibe Coding 找到的 5 个黄金机会》（作者 Ronin；编译 AididiaoJP） 围绕 AI 与 vibe coding 在加密行业的应用展开，提出中心化与去中心化交易所套利机器人、预测市场套利工具、链上数据聚合器、自动私信销售智能体等 4 类可落地方向，并详细拆解其技术架构、风险与推广逻辑。AI 已显著降低个人开发门槛，但真正难点不在代码，而在市场需求、产品结构与长期执行力；多数人高估了短期暴富可能，却低估了持续积累经验与社交资本的重要性。 阅读全文：https://t.co/zn0uIG1WoM

[Dr.Hash“Wesley” @CryptoApprenti1]

《博弈之道》是25岁写的文章 ，写于21年牛初。这一年也是最区块链路途中最精彩的一年。

价值投资是有的，仅仅适用于现货，基本逻辑就是基于 MMT（Modern Monetary Theory），货币必然超发，选择好的资产持有即可。但是要你有足够的本金和耐心，在绝对低位建仓，然后持有很长时间，就像 2020 年 3 -12 买入 4000 美金左右的比特币, 以及复权后 60+ 美金的特斯拉，50+ 美金的苹果或者说你在很多年前买入的 10 美金的苹果和 100 美金的亚马逊。

但很多人并没有这种认知或者耐心去长时间的持有一种资产，经常在踏空过去的懊恼中度过。最典型的就是 “我曾经可以买 3000 美金的比特币，但现在 1w 了我还是不买了吧”，然后眼看着比特币涨到四万多美金，又反复懊恼。其实不如放眼于未来，何必纠结过去呢。

我们今天讲的是期货，是以小博大。什么是期货，一言以蔽之：追涨杀跌。

追涨杀跌是十分反人性的一件事情，从心理学的角度来讲，人在盈利的时候都想赶紧落袋，而在亏损的时候却很能抗，这往往酿成大悲剧。赚一点就想跑了止盈，但一亏却很能抗得住单，越抗越上头，上头就贷款梭哈或者一直冲保证金直到爆仓。而期货的真谛不是这样的，在于顺势，既然趋势一直，注意是一直，跟你不在同一个方向，你该做的就是止损。

期货不在意绝对的建仓价格，只在意趋势是否能继续。从总的时间的长河里看，趋势其实只占 5% 的交易时间，举个例子，比特币从 3500 到一万用了快一年，从一万到两万用了四个月，从两万到三万用了 17 天，从三万到四万用了 7 天。其实从这一波赚钱最多的主升浪不是四千抄底的人，而是从一万二一路滚仓到最后四万特别是最后这几天的利润才是最多的。小钱玩家需要在贪婪的时候更贪婪，滚仓到最后你才能发大财。因为你有杠杆，你不能做时间的朋友，你是时间的敌人。涨得越高，越敢追，涨的别人害怕恐惧了，你反而要加仓。这样的话可能别人在比特币涨 100% 才能赚到的的钱你只用 5% 就能赚到了。我这么说比较笼统，但大致想表达的就是: 你失去了时间这个朋友，那就要用杠杆打败别人，不断浮盈加仓。而现货就不一样了，一定要跌出价值才能抄底越跌越抄底。其实这两种都是赌，不过赌得方法不一样。现货是用时间换空间，而期货相反，用空间换时间。你看长期得准不准根本不重要，因为杠杆不允许你看这么远，只能走一步看一步，短中期追寻趋势的延续即可。

期货市场赚钱最多的不是看得准的人，而是敢赌的人，你看的再准有什么用，你敢重仓赌么？很多人喜欢在意自己好看的收益率，可那点仓位又有什么用呢，赚不了大钱，杠杆，收益率都不重要，总仓位才是你赚钱的根本。

胆子大加上命硬才能赚到钱，低倍复利对于大部分期货玩家来说是个骗局。因为期货市场黑天鹅太多，再低倍都有可能一波归零。所以笔者认为，期货的目的在于以小博大，用小资金去博高收益，这必然承担高风险。杠杆一定不能低，一定得浮盈加仓，因为你是用空间换时间。在最短的时间赚最多的钱，断头就是死，但你不能怕不能怂，就是赌趋势继续，就是赌自己的命够硬。你怕输怎么会赚得到钱呢？

这一波实盘账户飞哥（李寻欢）在短短两个月从 20w 赚到 5000 多万靠的就是浮盈加仓一把梭。飞哥亲口说的他根本不会技术分析，就是靠感觉。这就是期货的精髓。你不能怕，你怕了你就输了。为什么你会怕，因为你盈利不够多，所以你亏不起，但你盈利够多的时候你把本金提了，然后就可以放心赌了。对，敢赌还有个原因是盈利了以后定时提现，然后继续盈利梭哈。

对于一个想进入期货市场完成暴富阶级跨越的人来说，最重要的是什么，技术分析？基本面分析？庄家内幕消息？都不是，是运气，因为没有人能够战胜市场，韭菜口中的 “庄家”，我们理解的 “主力” 也不行。在市场这个大海面前，庄家也好，韭菜也罢，我们都只是市场惊涛骇浪的一艘扁舟，一只小船, 能做的无非都只是顺势而为罢了。

我想给大家举一个有趣的例子。大家在币圈这么多年，从几百美金的的比特币看到了四五万美金的的比特币。想必见过许多技术分析天花乱坠的老师们，什么维科夫，江恩，缠论，谐波，艾略特波浪等等, 画起图分析起来一套一套的，给点位都是精确到小数点后一位，每天都是恭喜跟上的朋友，又吃上大肉啦！一看仓位资金量，却还没有自己的大。

大家一定想知道，这么厉害的一个人，一定是个交易多年叱咤风云的高手或者说传统金融市场的大佬吧？我也怀着好奇而又崇拜的心情加了他好友进行采访，一聊天发现，到现在大神居然 2019 年 5 月才进场买第一个比特币，2020年10月3号正式开始玩合约，到笔者写文章前刚好三个月多一点。

这两位赚了上亿的大神操作，有点异曲同工之妙，或许这就是期货的真谛？这其中的奥妙，留给读者自己体会。

我讲这些就是想说，对于期货来讲，运气和心态远比技术更重要。我们需要修炼的其实是心境。一命二运三风水四积阴德五读书。命要够硬，心态要够好。不怕输，你才可能赢。

有人问我，飞哥之后不也爆了 2000 多万。我说是的，但他还有两千多万已经提现了。所以你会输 也会赢 但你赢了以后提现才是真的赢了。肥宅 17 年赚了上亿，18 年几乎亏光，也是靠着提现活下来并且越活越好。运气有好有坏，不可能一直一番风顺，期货市场就是这样，但你要保持理智，保持提现，然后像鳄鱼一蛰伏数年等待属于你的那一拨机会，然后功成身退。如果认识到自己命不够硬，那还是趁早退出期货市场比较好。认输并不耻辱，你来这里唯一想做的是赚钱。要认识到人是不可能战胜市场的以及随机性是不可预测的。

我并非倡导赌局，而是想让大家认识到市场的不确定性根本无法预测。所以低倍复利就是扯淡的，不如一把梭哈一波大的。早早认识到自己命不够硬，也就能早早离场。这也跟江总“炒币加场内杠杆玩合约期货=吸毒”的观点一样，因为大部分人是注定失败的。要认识到人是不可能战胜市场的以及随机性是不可预测的。

这些看法针对的是期货市场，你可以玩现货，一点杠杆都不要碰，因为你只要碰了杠杆，就有爆仓归零的可能性 ，大部分人大亏就是从一个小抗单开始的，无法战胜人性，无法止损，从而满盘皆输。因为交易实在是太反人性了！

其他的也暂时没有很多想说了，在生日这天快凌晨六点写下这篇文章，希望对大家有帮助。

—— Wesley @CryptoApprenti1 01/15/2021

[Cos(余弦)😶‍🌫️ @evilcos]

好吧，这次手法细节有点意思了：

攻击目标是 LayerZero 运营的 DVN（去中心化验证器网络）所依赖的下游 RPC 基础设施。大概攻击步骤：

1. 拿到 LayerZero DVN 使用的 RPC 节点列表；

2. 攻破其中两个独立集群的 RPC 节点，替换 op-geth 二进制文件；

3. 使用选择性欺骗（selective spoofing）：只对 DVN 返回伪造的恶意 payload，对其他 IP（包括 LayerZero 自己的 Scan 服务）则返回真实数据；

4. 对未被攻破的 RPC 节点发动 DDoS，迫使 DVN “故障转移（failover）”到已被投毒的 RPC；

5. 完成伪造消息验证后，恶意二进制自毁，清除日志。

导致 LayerZero DVN 错误地为“从未发生过的交易”签发了验证。这不是 LayerZero 协议、DVN 密钥管理或 Endpoint 本身的漏洞，而是 RPC 基础设施被针对性投毒…

最终造成了 KelpDAO 这次 $290M 被盗事件。LayerZero 认为责任在 KelpDAO 只使用了 1/1 DVN 配置，存在“单点风险”…

嗯，这次也同样怀疑极大可能是“朝鲜黑客”的“杰作”…

RPC 投毒攻击也是老技巧，早年交易所们多少都经历过，这次干到了这些“去中心化”协议上了…🤦🏻‍♂️

[paulwei @coolish]

今天我把近6年BTC历史交易数据，开源到Github了：
https://t.co/Ukhd9Gt8te

2020年5月1日至今4万多条订单，17万多条成交明细，
两轮完整牛熊2000多天日夜博弈，全在这套数据里。

AI时代，最宝贵的就是上下文。
你在整个互联网，可能都很难找到这种等级的
真金白银二级市场交易上下文数据，任你下载使用。

去年11月，我把Bitmex只读Api Key公开一两周时，
还没龙虾，就少数网友vibe了一些数据分析、产品。
比如：
@WeWill_Rocky 做的 https://t.co/De723I3ukG
我自己做的交易时光机：https://t.co/3lIVpxBfGL
当时其他一些相关内容：https://t.co/O6iIV9KbQ0

现在更多人有了龙虾、爱马仕，
把个人二级交易真金白银数据喂给AI Agent这件事，
门槛大大降低，更多人能做了，也有了更高的含金量。

所以秉承Open Intelligence理念，
我想向这个混沌的世界贡献自己的减熵Legacy，
在Hermes-Agent的帮助下，
开源了这个数据仓库，
后续可能尝试自动化定期更新。

只要把这个Github网址
https://t.co/Ukhd9Gt8te
发给你的龙虾爱马仕，就能指挥它做任何角度的分析，
很好奇，大家对这样一份数据，
能炼化出些什么奇趣的角度？
希望能在后续看到一些有趣的回响。
Happy vibing & Happy birthday to myself

[币安Binance华语 @binancezh]

✨币安学院最新课程《AI 入门：智能体与技能》已上线！

🎓研究AI这么久，是时候来拿个学业证书了

完成课程并晒出证书，赢币安专属周边👇https://t.co/Ifq27ALcI1

[小C | 🔶BNB @0xXIAOc]

在币安钱包进行永续合约交易，交易额超过1000USDT，可获得3个币安Alpha积分

🔶0手续费教程｜图文版
活动时间：4月14日20:00 至4月28日 20:00

1⃣打开币安钱包，点击【交易】。
切换到【永续合约】页面，点击【启用交易】，完成确认和签名

2⃣在永续合约页面充值
点击订单面板中【可用】旁边的【+】图标
选择代币并输入金额后，等待约 1 分钟即可到账。

3⃣选择 BTC，使用“只做 Maker”的方式进行做多或做空。
平仓时，选择【限价单】并勾选【只做 Maker】

[追风Lab .eth🌿 @ZF_lab]

这个网站不错，可以查下自己老钱包是不是还有些待处理的ETH，目前全网有16万个被遗忘的ETH。只要输入钱包地址即可查询。

查询链接： https://t.co/cpR9jsk1Vn