The Brazilian School of Logic is saddened and orphaned by Prof. Newton da Costa's passing away, last night, in Florianópolis. His striking presence anywhere was always overflowing with life and logic, and this is how he shall be remembered by those who had the chance to meet him.
Please, JOIN US and help us spread the word!
Workshop New Perspectives on Anomalies in the Sciences
🇧🇷October 5 and 6, 2023
Registration form for attending via Zoom is here: https://t.co/J3soT4EF7K
Website and program: https://t.co/I63G6FJ8C7
stumbled upon a quote from S. Aaronson that goes hard:
"If we comp. scientists were physicists we would just declare P!=NP to be a law of nature and give ourselves Nobel Prizes for its discovery. If later it turns out that we were wrong we just give ourselves more Nobel Prizes"
@GarethRPearce i've only skimmed it, but it seems that you may have a division by 0 assigned to your 'cotrue_counter' var when both booleans turn out false
This paper on the positive correlation between alcohol consumption & brain shrinkage still haunts me, and I'm considering donating to researches that aim to falsify its claim
https://t.co/UHj3EULHMe
@tim_elmo (I usually qualify my metaphysical positions on the basis of one offering a 'better account' of something than the the other. And this naturally happens in a meta-level to be accessed rather indirectly by language)
@tim_elmo oh I get, you mean enunciating it like stating a theory directly at, say, the level of object language -possibly truth-functional etc.
yeah in this sense I agree. I tend to see the quarrel about metaphysics pretty much in a carnapian way, there being no 'matter of fact' issues
@DrYohanJohn also when people use isomorphism wrt 'things in the world' and some abstract structure. I mean, this is a category mistake if we are not admitting, say, Urelemente or such. It seems just a huge leap from physical reality, empirical data, and abstract structures