🚨 BREAKING: Tencent has killed the “next-token” paradigm.
Tencent and Tsinghua has released CALM (Continuous Autoregressive Language Models), and it completely disrupts the next-token paradigm.
LLMs currently waste massive amounts of compute predicting discrete, single tokens through a huge vocabulary softmax layer. It’s slow and scales poorly.
CALM bypasses the vocabulary entirely. It uses a high-fidelity autoencoder to compress chunks of text into a single continuous vector with 99.9% reconstruction accuracy.
The model now predicts the “next vector” in a continuous space.
The numbers are actually insane:
- Each generative step now carries 4× the semantic bandwidth.
- Training compute is reduced by 44%.
- The softmax bottleneck is completely removed.
We’re literally watching language models evolve from typing discrete symbols to streaming continuous thoughts.
This changes the entire trajectory of AI.
Is Israel and America trying to drag NATO into conflict in Iran?
Iranian missile targeting Türkiye might be Israeli false flag operation: Turkish columnist
https://t.co/mOW92qQOm4
🇮🇱‼️Israel will jetzt wissen, wer seine Feinde sind
Du kannst jetzt auf deren Liste stehen.
Ein Video sorgt derzeit für Aufsehen: Mehrere anonyme Nutzer:innen auf X berichten, dass ihre echten Namen plötzlich in Israel gegoogelt wurden, nachdem sie das Land wegen des Kriegs in Gaza kritisiert hatten.
Die Betroffenen vermuten einen Zusammenhang mit AU10TIX, einer Identitätsverifizierungssoftware, die X für Account-Verifizierungen nutzt. Das Unternehmen wurde von ehemaligen Mitgliedern der israelischen Geheimdienst-Eliteeinheit Unit 8200 gegründet.
Laut einer Recherche von MintPress News könnte es sich um eine der größten „Honeypot“-Operationen überhaupt handeln.
Dabei geben anonyme Accounts bei der Verifizierung ihre echten Daten an, die anschließend genutzt werden könnten, um kritische Stimmen zu identifizieren.
Mehrere Nutzer berichten, dass ihre vollständigen bürgerlichen Namen, die sie online nie veröffentlicht haben, laut Google-Trenddaten plötzlich aus Israel gesucht wurden.
Ob dahinter tatsächlich ein systematisches Vorgehen steckt, ist bislang nicht bewiesen. Der Fall wirft jedoch neue Fragen über Privatsphäre, Verifizierungssysteme und politische Überwachung auf sozialen Plattformen auf.
After naming Chabad, Tucker Carlson is being targeted hard. So he doubles down.
“They want to weaken the United States…and they want to weaken Western Europe. Which, they just hate for whatever reason…they truly hate Western Europe.”
“That is super dark. Completely evil.”
🚨BREAKING: Rep. Ted Lieu says the full Epstein files contain information that Donald Trump RAPED minors.
So he started a war to distract us from his crimes.
What's your response to Ted Lieu......??👀
MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ON 𝕏. LET’S GO 👏
🚨 OpenAI's head of Robotics just resigned because the company is building lethal AI weapons with NO human authorization required.
> Read that again. Lethal. Autonomy. Without. Human. Authorization.
> The person who built the robots is telling you she quit because there are no guardrails on who they kill.
This is the same company that won't let ChatGPT say a swear word.
They put safety filters on your prompts but none on their kill chain.
Scarrry!
Diese Dateien sind eine BOMBE.
Dank @JudiciaryGOP haben wir nun Beweise dafür, dass die EU aktiv legale Inhalte zensiert hat, die ihrer Agenda zuwiderlaufen – und dass sie sich in mindestens acht europäische Wahlen eingemischt hat, darunter die niederländischen Wahlen von 2023 und 2025, indem sie sich mit Social-Media-Plattformen getroffen hat, um sie zu drängen, politische Äußerungen in den Tagen vor der Wahl zu zensieren.
Im Vorfeld der niederländischen Wahlen 2023 machte die EU-Kommission sogar den damaligen niederländischen Innenminister @hugodejonge zu einem „vertrauenswürdigen Flagger”, der berechtigt war, vorrangige Zensuranträge gemäß dem DSA zu stellen.
Welche Art von politischen Äußerungen wollten sie zensieren, fragen Sie sich?
- „Populistische Rhetorik”
- „Regierungsfeindliche/EU-feindliche Inhalte”
- „Elitefeindliche” Inhalte
- „Politische Satire”
- „Anti-Migranten- und islamfeindliche Inhalte”
- „Anti-Flüchtlingsinhalte/Anti-Einwanderer-Stimmung”
- „Anti-LGBTQI-Inhalte”
- „Meme-Subkultur”
Mit anderen Worten: alles, was ihrer Agenda zuwiderläuft, alles, was auch nur im Entferntesten rechtsgerichtet oder konservativ ist, und alles, was mit der katastrophalen Migrantensituation hier in Europa zu tun hat.
Und ratet mal, welche Plattform als einzige nicht kooperiert hat? Natürlich @X. Dieselbe Plattform, gegen die die EU im Rahmen des DSA eine Geldstrafe in Höhe von 120 Millionen Euro verhängt hat und deren Büros derzeit in Frankreich durchsucht werden.
Das ist die Art von Dingen, wegen denen Regierungen zurücktreten und Institutionen wie die EU stürzen sollten. Die Demokratie ist tot.
Schafft die EU ab! Jetzt!
Quelle @EvaVlaar
Statement
In the Name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
The joint military aggression by the #ZionistRegime and the #UnitedStates of America against the Islamic Republic of Iran, which began on February 28, 2026, with the martyrdom of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution & a number of senior officials of our country, and concurrently with attacks on military and civilian infrastructure including schools, hospitals, sports facilities, residential homes, and public service centers, and which continues unabated, constitutes a flagrant violation of Iran's territorial integrity and national sovereignty.
Responding to this ruthless military aggression is Iran's inherent right to self-defense, as enshrined in Article 51 of the UN Charter. The armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran are utilizing all their capabilities to counter this criminal aggression. The exercise of Iran's inherent right to legitimate self-defense will continue until the aggression ceases, or until the UN Security Council fulfills its duty under Article 39 of the UN Charter by identifying and naming the aggressors and determining the responsibilities arising from their aggression.
As has been elucidated in various correspondences with the UN Security Council, based on the fundamental principle of international law concerning the "prohibition of causing harm from one's own territory," states are prohibited from allowing their territory to be used, directly or indirectly, to cause injury or damage to other states. In this regard, UN General Assembly Resolution 3314, adopted by consensus and reflecting customary international law on the definition and instances of military aggression, considers in Article 3, paragraph (f), one instance of military aggression to be "The action of a State in allowing its territory, which it has placed at the disposal of another State, to be used by that other State for perpetrating an act of aggression against a third State."
Furthermore, as a fundamental principle of international law, states must strongly prevent, and not facilitate or support, the launching of military aggression by forces stationed in their territory against other countries. It is evident that in the event of violation of these fundamental obligations, other states from whose territory military aggression is launched against a third state will bear international legal responsibilities, including with regard to compensation for direct and indirect damages incurred.
The Islamic Republic of Iran, in exercising its inherent right to defend its national sovereignty, and in light of the clear failure of the UN Security Council to fulfill its duties and responsibilities under the UN Charter, has undertaken necessary and proportionate defensive operations against the bases and installations of the aggressors in the region. This action is legitimate from the perspective of international law, and prior and continuous warnings regarding it were issued at various levels.
No factor can undermine Iran's inherent right to defend itself against the military aggression of the United States and the Zionist regime. Iran's defensive operations are directed against the targets and facilities that are the origin and source of the aggressive actions against the Iranian nation, or which serve such purposes. Regional countries have undoubtedly realized by now that US bases on their soil have not contributed to regional security, but are used only to support Zionist child-killers and American aggressors.
The Islamic Republic of Iran remains committed to maintaining and continuing friendly relations with regional countries based on mutual respect, the principle of good neighborliness, and respect for each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
It emphasizes that Iran's defensive operations against US military bases and installations in the region should by no means be construed as enmity or hostility towards the countries of the region.
Our economy is as good as fucked. Life is about to get harder over this bullshit. However, if this ends up resulting in Israel getting hypersonically assfvcked off of the face of the planet, it will be 110% worth it.