David Moore

Has too many ideas for his own good! Occasionally streams computational physics at

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@zetalyrae @oxcrows 31 is unc as hell. 32 is young and in demand though, sry to inform, I don't make the rules I just repeat them.

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@jsuarez In this paper we introduce the new technique Rock Hopping, to be distinguished from Scrambling by [...]

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@anthrupad We're catching worms even the early birds haven't seen.

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@BurnZeZ @vxunderground That's the amateur move. The pro move is to have the folder labeled "sandbox" and run the malware from there

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@quinnswm Thanks for putting the effort in + posting the straightforward definitions. I tend to get lost in definition-soup so it's nice to see things presented clearly like this.

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@NickChapmn @materion 😵‍💫

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@comohology @vircodificat @lolleka couldn't be me

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@geogristle @_xjdr when the integral term gets too large you give up and do it by hand

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@NickChapmn The struggle ☹️

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

Another video from the GOAT!

[inigo quilez @iquilezles]

Just uploaded - coding a procedural tower of bricks:

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

Who is this guy? What's he doing up there? What even is that pose? Get down from there.

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

(I couldn't resist the snarky answer... but the serious version of the snarky answer is something like: is the hypothetical outcome surprising because of a new innovation, unlikely discovery, or unlikely circumstance? Or because my prior beliefs were wrong and lazily constructed? I'd lean towards the former. The statistician's "it is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose.")

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@EMostaque Erm they wouldn't change because then they would be posteriors

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@LCOLONQ Oub 2

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@fkasummer Well, I'm a big believer in defining it operationally/experimentally. So if you just talk authoritatively about it from any stance and I'll have no experiment which can distinguish between whether you're bluffing or whether you've come up with a convincing solution.

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@undebeha I can contribute a few empty water bottles to the effort

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@fkasummer I am illiterate then.

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@Michael_Moroz_ Absurdly cool!!! Special functions + Newton's method is like... the perfect denial of service attack (huge amount of effort to get robust). This in real-time next? https://t.co/AZZ3JVfggy

[U.S. National Science Foundation @NSF]

Happy #BlackHoleFriday!

This simulated video shows what a #blackhole system would look like up close. We haven’t seen one with our own eyes—yet—since our Milky Way’s central supermassive black hole is over 25,000 light-years away.

📹: Chael, Wielgus, Palumbo, Johnson, Bouman

[David Moore @physbuzz2]

@Sauers_ D: my alpha!

[teak @tikalteacall]

Not all commons are overgrazed, and not all rides are free. Sometimes things just work because people happen to care.