@Leon_Schreib can you pls assist we are about 50 people at Cpt HA that might not be helped today i have been here since 11:00 and the lady in front om me here for a 2nd day? This purely to collect id’s and passports. 🙏Apparently after 15:30 we must come back.
@Leon_Schreib@HomeAffairsSA
Why if you queue for 5 hours just to collect your passport or new id are you told that they will only take 5 or 10 more people in the line at Cape Town home affairs, and now close the doors due to load shedding, really?
@Leon_Schreib@HomeAffairsSA
Why if you queue for 5 hours just to collect your passport or new id are you told that they will only take 5 or 10 more people in the line at Cape Town home affairs, and now close the doors due to load shedding, really?
While the crowds cheer, racehorses suffer in silence.
It’s time to change that.
Visit https://t.co/BWgcqQFYuS
Sign the petition.
Support the NSPCA’s proposed amendments to the NHRA’s rules.
#ReinInThePain#NSPCA#StopAnimalAbuse#ChangeHorseRacing
The sheer insanity of that actual response from Google’s AI is staggering! They will fix it to be less obvious in the future, but the bias will still be in there.
AI mirrors the mistakes of its creators.
When people wonder how things might go wrong if AI controlled the world, this example clearly illustrates the point.
The best approach to AI safety – in my opinion, the only approach that would work – is to be maximally truth-seeking.
Honesty is the best policy.
In case you were wondering how superconductors work, this is a good explanation. They are a very interesting phenomenon and may prove economically useful, but are not a hard requirement for a sustainable energy future.
Physics has many powerful tools of reasoning to understand and predict reality. Those tools, like first principles analysis and thinking in the limit, are broadly applicable to anything, in my experience.
With Grok, @xAI is attempting to create an AI that reasons from first principles, which is fundamental if you care about getting as close to the truth as possible.
The acid test would be reaching a conclusion that is correct even if it is extremely unpopular, which means being right even when the training data is almost entirely wrong.
For example, Galileo concluded, after observing the moons of Jupiter from a telescope he engineered, that it was far more probable that Earth revolved around the Sun than the other way around. This view was so unpopular that he was forced to recant and placed under house arrest!
If you had trained an LLM on material back then, it would’ve given you the popular, but wrong, explanation. Due to social and legal pressure, it likely wouldn’t even acknowledge the possibility that the Earth revolved around the Sun.
For AI to help us understand the true nature of the universe, it must be able to discard the popular, but wrong, in favor of the unpopular, but right.
#sapsHQ [NEWSBREAK]
The National Joint Operational and Intelligence Structure (NatJOINTS), which is responsible for coordinating all security and law enforcement operations throughout the country, has once again delivered a peaceful, safe and secure #SONA2024.
NP https://t.co/1znEaZvUUm