Samra

[Saket Gokhale @SaketGokhale]

Modi-Shah used their ecosystem, police, & media to doxx & harrass a 15-year-old minor girl.

After she made an apology video & disclosed her age, the coward Modi panicked & posted that he “forgives her”.

What sort of a 56” PM feels threatened by a few swear words from a child? What sort of a democracy unleashes the state machinery to go after a minor teenage girl?

And WHO is Modi to “forgive” anyone? Especially when he should be begging for forgiveness for targeting students.

Modi-Shah are the biggest cowards this nation has seen in 75 years.

[s @_sectumsempra18]

om birla should be renamed ohm birla because he has a thing for resistance

[Arvind Gunasekar @arvindgunasekar]

RSS ran Union Education Ministry, not Dharmendra Pradhan. An OSD in Union Education Ministry was running it. Vice Chancellors of all the universities are from the RSS. RSS doesn’t want students to be students, they only want andhbhakts: Rahul Ganhdi, LoP in Lok Sabha.

[Shashi Learns @ShashiLearns]

This Was Absolute Cinema. 😂

Rahul Gandhi: "BJP Is Violent."

Narendra Modi (Stands Up): "Rahul Gandhi Is Calling The Entire Hindu Religion Violent."

Rahul Gandhi: "Narendra Modi Is Not Hinduism. BJP Is Not Hinduism. RSS Is Not Hinduism."

Modi Sat Down. 😂😂

[Press Trust of India @PTI_News]

Every single university in India has a vice chancellor from RSS, alleges Rahul Gandhi.

[Roshan Rai @RoshanKrRaii]

Look at this fraud.

> He was born in 1960

> was 14 years old, 8th Standard when Emergency started

> was 16 when Emergency ended

But somehow he was picked from school in 8th standard for doing student activism 😭😭

[Spider @SpiderAlert24]

See how governments control NDTV.
An Ex-NDTV journalist explained it.

[Shantanu @shaandelhite]

There can be only two cases —

Either Amit Shah ordered the firing or he wasn’t aware. In first case he is the culprit and in the second case he is incompetent.

— Rahul Gandhi ji on fire today 🔥

[Sushant Singh @SushantSin]

Glad that the Hindu edit has called out this quest for a technical solution via Nilekani to a much bigger problem of education and employment in today’s India

[Chanakya @ChanakyaShah]

Dainik Bhaskar journalist went undercover as a laborer in a flour mill in UP and exposed a rotten system that's playing with people's health.

Operators in mills across Agra, Firozabad are mixing stone powder from Rajasthan into atta, increasing their earnings by 70–80 paise per kg i.e. 7k-8k extra per day. These adulterated flour, sold under brands like Maharaja Bhog Atta, is even reaching school mid-day meals. These calcium carbonate can clog intestines and damage the liver and kidneys.

Being in the D2C industry, I'm aware of many brands who do these kinds of things just to save margins and make more money. We keep calling them out, but this looks much bigger.

Government and FSSAI need to act and take control. Consumer health should never be compromised for profit.

[Nitin Sethi @nit_set]

One of our mandates at The Reporters' Collective @reporters_co is to build a larger village of skilled and courageous journalists across India.

To share what we learn. To provide others the methods and skills we put behind our impactful investigative journalism.

For that:
The Reporters' Collective Training for Investigative Journalism

Aug 31 - Sept 2. Delhi.

Three-day intensive workshop in Delhi. For journalists from north India.

(All costs borne by TRC for selected candidates.)

For more Details: https://t.co/EFXtdsVy3g

[Bhavreen Kandhari @BhavreenMK]

Protected Forests ✅
Oxygen Parks ❌

[Maadhyam @maadhyam_engage]

As protests continued in the House, #LokSabha was adjourned till 5pm at which time the Govt intends to take the Bill up.

Interestingly, Speaker said that 91 amendments were received from MPs on the Bill. That itself shows the need to send the Bill to a Standing Committee for proper scrutiny. Amendments moved by MPs on the floor of the House are mechanically and routinely rejected without any discussion!

[Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) @internetfreedom]

The Delhi Police's takedown drive against posts critical of the Prime Minister is unconstitutional.

New Delhi, 27 July 2026

Media reports today state that the Delhi Police has directed social media platforms to remove posts, videos, memes and reels containing remarks it describes as "abusive", "offensive" and "objectionable" towards the Prime Minister, uploaded during the student protests at Jantar Mantar and after the 'Sansad Chalo' march of 20 July 2026. At least three platforms have reportedly received notices. Several posts have already been taken down. A dedicated police team is monitoring social media to identify further content, and reports indicate that criminal proceedings are contemplated against those who posted it. No order has been published. While reports indicate the notices invoke the Information Technology Act, the specific provision relied upon and the text of the notices remain undisclosed.

The Internet Freedom Foundation condemns this takedown drive and calls for the notices to be disclosed and withdrawn.

On the reports available, the content being removed is political expression. The movement at Jantar Mantar has been conducted as much through reels, memes, posters and digital artwork as through assembly on the ground. This is how a digital native generation raised online speaks about accountability. As per Article 19(2) restrictions on speech only on eight specified grounds. Offensiveness is not one of them. In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1, the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the IT Act precisely because expressions such as "grossly offensive" and causing "annoyance" were vague, subjective, and swept protected speech within their net. Eleven years later, the Delhi Police is applying the same standard through informal notices and legal powers which are not being publicly disclosed.

As per existing practices there are two routes for removing online content. The first is Section 69A of the IT Act read with the Blocking Rules, 2009, which requires a reasoned order, committee review, and notice to the originator, as the Delhi High Court affirmed in Tanul Thakur v. Union of India (2022). The second is Section 79(3)(b), which Shreya Singhal read down to require a court order or a government notification strictly confined to Article 19(2) grounds. If these notices were routed through the Sahyog Portal, they rest on a regime whose constitutionality remains under challenge before multiple High Courts. However, even if it is used police notices citing offensiveness satisfy neither.

Reports that platforms were told the content violates "their policies" make the defect worse, the police have no mandate to enforce the community guidelines of private companies. Unpublished directions are also contrary to Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637, which requires that orders restricting fundamental rights be published so that they can be challenged. If the underlying theory is defamation of the Prime Minister, the police have no role at all. Defamation under Section 356 of the BNS is a non-cognizable offence, prosecuted only on a complaint by the person aggrieved under Section 222 of the BNSS.

Our demands

1. The Delhi Police must publish every notice issued, the legal provision invoked, and the list of URLs affected.

2. Notices directed at satire, criticism, and political commentary must be withdrawn. Any removal must follow the procedures under Section 69A or a judicial order.

3. No criminal proceedings should be initiated against persons for speech that does not meet the constitutional threshold of incitement.

4. Platforms must decline requests unsupported by valid legal orders, notify affected users, and disclose the number of government demands in their transparency reports.

Students who question an examination system are exercising their fundamental rights and deleting their posts will not delete their questions.

Reports referred to:

1. Times of India, "Delhi Police orders removal of offensive posts against PM Narendra Modi linked to NEET paper leak protests", 27 July 2026
2. News18, "Delhi Police Issues Notices To Social Media Platforms Over Offensive Posts Against PM Modi During Jantar Mantar Protest", 27 July 2026

[AIN @Tejusurya_]

After months of protests, a fast-track court is finally set up to hear the NEET paper leak case.

Day 1: Case adjourned because no CBI officer showed up to present the case.

[Bezwada Wilson @BezwadaWilson]

Why Government hiding 261 sewer and septic tank deaths ?593 persons were killed in Sewer & septic tanks, from January 2021 till date, but the Government has reported only 332 sewer and septic tank deaths to Parliament, this injustice can't be tolerated . #stopkillingus

[disha verma @di_shawarma]

nilakeni—who has singlehandedly seized digital autonomy and privacy of every single indian through countless surveillance architectures and is now funding and platforming biased, pro BJP social impact work worldwide—hired to fix india’s education accountability problem. ok.

[Jawhar Sircar @jawharsircar]

PM Modi Announces Task Force On Exam Reforms Under Infosys Co-Founder Nilkeni — to ensure the reliability of upcoming examinations.
I have my doubts:
(1) Nilkeni & Infosys are deeply in tandem through lots of profitable Govt business — they matter more.
(2) Another founder's wife is now MP who always votes with Govt
(3) Politics decides everything: Nilkeni's laboured Aadhar is now trash before Election Commission & Citizenship
(4) Exam Crooks operate at last mile — not within digital systems
🟥 This is just a FACE SAVER.
https://t.co/TOSGaz3wS2

[Nikhil Pahwa @nixxin]

Let me tell you where this is going, and what the Nandan Nilekani committee for exams is broadly going to recommend and why:

1. Nandan Nilekani has a standard playbook: create "Digital Public Infrastructure", create a digital identity and try and build 100% national coverage for this. He has a single playbook for government that he and Ispirit have used in the past, and you can expect the same.

This Playbook has two key parts: identity and interchange infrastructure.

2. The identity: One part of this Playbook already exists... the ID, specifically the Apaar ID. They've done: Aadhaar (ID), UHID(Health), Apaar ID(Education), FasTag(Transportation).
Every crisis is an opportunity for our Tech godman. COVID was used create UHID without consent during vaccination.

The Apaar ID, which schools have forced students to get and link to Aadhaar, will be used here. The idea was always that these would be used for examinations.

3. The infrastructure is the second part: IT services companies benefit from the deployment of this infrastructure. Look at banking , GSTN and govt services and you can see who benefits and how. There's sometimes conflict of interest for some people but who cares.

4. The people: You need to look at the people in this committee and ecosystem that will be built around it. Some of them will be old affiliates... You'll see the former Aadhaar "volunteers" in different parts of it, and in the business that get built around it. Guess who backs ekstep and who is there. If you start a people map, you'll see a pattern. Earlier omidiyar network was involved and now I'm sure the Bill and Melinda gates foundation (some affiliates there) might be interested.

There's a pattern but if course, even lots of correlation may not be causation.

5. The committee will recommend the usage of Apaar ID and exam systems that use them. They might recommend an authority to manage them similar to UIDAI, or just coopt or infiltrate NTA. There are areas where Nilenani influence remains: NPCI, various RBI committes mapping its future. During COVID, in Cowin and the National Health Authority, affiliates were involved, though that didn't end well.

6. We need to be conscious that this is a part of the citizen mapping plan: the Aadhaar plan, which maps and tracks us from, in their words "cradle to grave". Multiple IDs linked to Aadhaar give it a sense of permanence and help with dedupe across databases. All this eventually is used to build, as the Aadhaar related state resident data hubs said “a 360 degree citizen profile”, and that's the surveillance infrastructure. All touchpoints of your file, mapped for surveillance. Fed into NATGRID.

7. I should clarify that this isn't a Narendra Modi plan. This precedes his ascension to power: the Congress was already setting some parts of it up. Guess who worked with them on it? The bureaucracy wants this and the politicians get coopted.

*

Of course, I'm not being serious. This is all a joke. A worst case scenario that probably isn't true. Just a silly nightmare for civil liberties. This is a parody account and a parody comment.

[Mohit Chauhan @mohitlaws]

Everyone noticed his reel.
I noticed his hands shaking.