sudoheart❤️ @pipabomi - Twitter Profile

参加港股打新的注意了根據香港交易所之規定，若同一客戶透過不同平台或券商重複申請同一隻新股，將被視為「重複認購」而被拒絕該等申請。由於各券商之間的系統無法即時同步認購紀錄，系統仍容許遞交指令。但最終是否獲分配，於公佈結果時一併通知。 🔔 溫馨提醒：如因重複申請而被交易所拒絕，將會收取每筆港幣 100 元的手續費。感謝您的理解與配合。

0

1

0

65

pipabomi retweeted

NickSung

@NickSung2017

3 months ago

$MU 价格预测 - 短期你们如果学过Al Brooks的price action理论，那一定对Measured Move 不陌生我个人对短期内MU的价格预期是 1160 和 1357 我们在840附近有个gap，然后： 1160 对应最近一次启动点，到gap的MM 1357 对应最近一次低点到gap的MM

NickSung2017's tweet photo. $MU 价格预测 - 短期
你们如果学过Al Brooks的price action理论，那一定对Measured Move 不陌生

我个人对短期内MU的价格预期是 1160 和 1357
我们在840附近有个gap，然后：

1160 对应最近一次启动点，到gap的MM
1357 对应最近一次低点到gap的MM https://t.co/mh3yues3su

5

40

9

25

32K

sudoheart❤️ @pipabomi

3 months ago

@LeoJoh2026 正解

0

3

sudoheart❤️ @pipabomi

3 months ago

@realameerdev Java,Python,Go,Ts

0

3

pipabomi retweeted

Andiamo

@andiamonow

3 months ago

Three different ETF issuers have now filed 2X LONG $SIVE products with the SEC. Let me explain why this matters. The filings: → REX Shares T-REX 2X Long SIVE Daily Target ETF (filed May 26) → Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SIVEF ETF (filed April 10) → Themes ETF Trust Leverage Shares 2X Long Sivers Semiconductors Daily ETF (filed May 26) Here's what most people don't understand about leveraged ETF launches: ETF issuers are essentially demand-prediction businesses. They don't file 2X products for stocks no one will trade. They file them for stocks with explosive expected retail interest — because that's where the trading volume and management fees come from. When THREE different issuers independently file the SAME 2X LONG product on a Swedish-listed company that doesn't even have a US primary listing yet, you're watching structural demand forecasting in real time. The pattern recognition is clear. Recent Defiance 2X Long launches include: $IREN, $RKLB, $PLTR, $MSTR, $RGTI, $ASTS, $OSCR, $MP, $LMND. Every one of those names is a retail momentum monster. $SIVE just got added to that company — except it's earlier in the cycle, before the US listing has even happened. Two additional details worth noting: All three products are 2X LONG. There are no matching 2X SHORT $SIVE products being filed. The directional asymmetry tells you exactly which way issuers expect retail demand to flow. The prospectus language explicitly references "American depositary receipts (ADRs) may be substituted as the Underlying Security." Translation: these products are being structured in anticipation of the Nasdaq NY dual listing and the ADR creation that will accompany it. What this actually means: → Three of the most active leveraged ETF issuers in the US market have positioned ahead of the $SIVE listing → They've allocated legal, regulatory, and operational resources for a stock most US retail hasn't even discovered yet → When the Nasdaq NY listing hits, these products go live and dramatically amplify the retail flow → Every dollar into a 2X LONG ETF requires the issuer to buy 2x that amount in $SIVE shares to maintain exposure This isn't a passive index inclusion. This is the leveraged demand layer being built BEFORE the stock has even arrived at its primary US venue. You don't get three 2X LONG ETF filings on a $2-3B Swedish-listed company by accident. You get them because the demand they're forecasting is real. $SIVE

25

375

52

136

64K