Pirehistoric

Culturally Muslim Agnostically Theist Unapologetically Turkish

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

Then next time, don’t embark on an adventure you cannot handle just because you have powerful countries behind you. You were the invaders in 1922. You started an aggressive war, got your asses kicked, and have been crying about it ever since. This pathetic obsession with the past will be your undoing.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

@dscplofchrst @Ofer_binshtok It is you who is ignorant. You don’t know Turkish politics and have an anti-Islam agenda, not that I care. I don’t give a shit about you or your people. Go suck a cock.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

@HardcoreBadasss @Ofer_binshtok Go look up the constitution. Corruption and nepotism doesn’t change a country’s system of government.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

Ne gerizekalı adamsın. Karşılaştırmayı bile işine geldiği gibi yapıyorsun. Deniz'in yaptığının senin örneğinde karşılığı, senin de seküler yaşama, ateizme sürekli sallaman olur. Zaten bu işi hayatın yapmışsın konuşuyorsun. Sen istediğin kadar benim özgürlük hakkım ile ilgili menfi konuş, olmaması gerektiğine de söyle. Bunu ergen kitlene yaptğın sürece sana karışan olmaz. Adamın yaptığı bu. Senin örneğin, insanların hak ve özgürlüklerini yok saymak, bunun lafını yapmak değil.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

@MakichyanA We did ask. They did not respond 🥱

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

@HMBohemond @r_dornson What “internal logic”? Honest question.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

@ogzzby @Afsharreyiz1 @HK_Ripper @turkishcy Iskitler=Scythians. Sakalar ayri bir kol. Onun Turkce nasil adlandirildigini bilmiyorum ama muhtemelen Sakadir.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

@Afsharreyiz1 @HK_Ripper @ogzzby @turkishcy Sakaları bilemiyorum ama Iskitlere ilişkin son yapılan çalışmalarda Orta Asya geni çıkıyor.

[Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump]

In order to get elected, @BarackObama will start a war with Iran.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

100k’nın hepsi muharip değil. Ayrıca kuşatmalarda saldıran ve savunan kuvvetleri her zaman böyle olur. Zaten 100k Istanbul’u savunuyor olsaydı, istanbulu Fatih de alamazdı. 1000 senede sadece Haçlıların kahpelikle alabildikleri şehri fethetmek Fatih’e nasip oldu. Yine de Istanbul’u almak hiç kolay değildi.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

@KR3894 @turkishcy You didn’t turn them into Orthodox temples because you just destroyed them outright lol.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

Ya he aq, Yunan klasigini dunya capinda yillarca ogretiyorlar. Uzerine 2000 senedir makaleler yaziliyor, sempozyumlar yapiliyor. O metinler uzerine yuz binlerce sayfa, binlerce kitap yazilmis. Sen 400 dakikada yuttun dimi? Sonra kibirli diyince kiziyorsun. Isin gucun milleti hor gormek, kendini kaf daginda sanmak. 31e devam.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

@HayWire_X Only nation to have a “happy assasination” day. Disgusting.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

@CMouroutis @MetehanALPASL10 @_Germanicus_I @uldintheturk If Turkey cannot enforce Paris Treaty because it’s not a party, then Greece cannot enforce UNCLOS because it’s not a party.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

@brnslagca @kolombiyalii09 Ayrı evlerde büyümüş olsalar da, kardeşlerin evlenmesi ya da sevişmesi tam olarak ensestliğin tanımı. Hala ne kıvırmaya çalışıyorsun. Anlamadığımız bir şey varsa anlat da aydınlanalım.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

@raziel_berry It’s called realpolitik.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

This woman has zero idea what she’s saying. It’s a bunch of anti-Turkish propaganda nonse.

Calling Ottoman Turkish “unsophisticated” is just historically illiterate. Ottoman Turkish was the language of an imperial court, a legal tradition, a bureaucracy, a literary world, and centuries of statecraft. You do not build one of the most durable empires in history with a “primitive” language. Its vocabulary was heavily Persianized, yes, but that does not make it any less Turkish. It is the same with what happens to every major civilization-language: grows, absorbs, refines, and develops vocab. Reducing Ottoman Turkish to some confused hybrid is nonsense.

The claim that the Ottomans were somehow not Turks is one of the laziest anti-Turkish myths still floating around. The dynasty was Turkish, the state tradition was Turkish, the ruling language was Turkish, and the empire emerged out of the Turkish conquest and settlement of Anatolia. Being an empire and ruling over many peoples does not erase that. No one says a European dynasty stopped being what it was because it ruled foreigners or intermarried with outsiders. The Ottomans were Turks who built an empire, not some mysterious post-ethnic civilization with no core identity.

Laatly, Ottoman Turkish was Turkish. Full stop. Its grammar, structure, and backbone were Turkish. The main difference is that older Ottoman texts were written in a different script and often used a more heavily Persianized high leveel vocab. Of course a modern Turk will not read a 15th- or 16th-century text as easily as a newspaper from today, but that is normal in every language. A modern English speaker also does not glide through 15th-century English as if it were written yesterday. Same with French, German or Italian. That does not make it a different language. It makes it an older form of the same language.

Go read a book.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

This woman has zero idea what she’s saying. It’s a bunch of anti-Turkish propaganda nonse.

Calling Ottoman Turkish “unsophisticated” is just historically illiterate. Ottoman Turkish was the language of an imperial court, a legal tradition, a bureaucracy, a literary world, and centuries of statecraft. You do not build one of the most durable empires in history with a “primitive” language. Its vocabulary was heavily Persianized, yes, but that does not make it any less Turkish. It is the same with what happens to every major civilization-language: grows, absorbs, refines, and develops vocab. Reducing Ottoman Turkish to some confused hybrid is nonsense.

The claim that the Ottomans were somehow not Turks is one of the laziest anti-Turkish myths still floating around. The dynasty was Turkish, the state tradition was Turkish, the ruling language was Turkish, and the empire emerged out of the Turkish conquest and settlement of Anatolia. Being an empire and ruling over many peoples does not erase that. No one says a European dynasty stopped being what it was because it ruled foreigners or intermarried with outsiders. The Ottomans were Turks who built an empire, not some mysterious post-ethnic civilization with no core identity.

Laatly, Ottoman Turkish was Turkish. Full stop. Its grammar, structure, and backbone were Turkish. The main difference is that older Ottoman texts were written in a different script and often used a more heavily Persianized high leveel vocab. Of course a modern Turk will not read a 15th- or 16th-century text as easily as a newspaper from today, but that is normal in every language. A modern English speaker also does not glide through 15th-century English as if it were written yesterday. Same with French, German or Italian. That does not make it a different language. It makes it an older form of the same language.

Go read a book.

[Pirehistoric @pirehistoric]

@baileydooodle @unsaly Evet.