@MagnusJacobsen_@LeandinhoDK Man kan vel nemt argumentere for at det er unødig stor kraft når bolden er 10 meter væk. At kalde det et tjat er, i min bog, en underdrivelse
@bhm_zzz@wilsonmafort Yes, these jobs are on LinkedIn, and it was the way I got mine. It was called Data Collector and it was for IMG Arena, who later got bought by Sportradar
@ostyrvold@DaleJohnsonBBC The intention of VAR is not to re-referee the whole game. The on-field ref should also have their say, therefore the conclusion was that it was a too soft of foul to give by the main ref, but not too soft of a foul for a VAR intervention
@ostyrvold@DaleJohnsonBBC It makes perfect sense. VAR is put in place for obvious errors. This is considered a soft foul by PL standards, but not a no foul, which would have led to a VAR intervention
@Emiolaosa@footycorner_tv@MKTIRB It's a drop ball because ball remained in play (in the penalty area) before the whistle. When it's in the penalty area, the ball will always be dropped to the defending goalkeeper
@The_Kess_1@DaleJohnsonESPN On a ceremonial free kick you have to wait until the referee whistles. Happens if you need a wall, injury, sanction/warning, and so on. Not every free kick needs a whistle, but referees will often show when it does or if it's obvious
@The_Kess_1@DaleJohnsonESPN From what I remember, it was the second time that DBH tried to take an early freekick when the referee had shown to wait for the whistle, therefore he was sanctioned. If the referee didn't signal for a ceremonial freekick, then he would be allowed to take it without the whistle
@FULHAMTHOMAS2@DaleJohnsonESPN You just showed a screenshot of him NOT saying the foul was correct, but him talking about the technical terms of a foul
Zubimendi on rejecting Liverpool, Madrid, Barca:
‘At Sociedad, I learned the power of narratives and journeys in football. I chose Arsenal to continue these, embracing the journey over just success, and hope to add to their story, regardless of what we achieve.’
[@EduardoHagn]
@owenthfc__@MADZI_thfc The laws of the game changed. Back then, it was up to the referee to decide if the stop/feint was unsportmans like conduct. Today, it is only illegal if you do it after planting your supporting foot (in this case, Son's left foot) before the kick
@ftbllin@GrumpyPants2U@owenthfc__ Man, I know the Laws of the Game. The goal would have been perfectly legal today, due to a change in interpretation of the laws. But back then it was up to the referee to decide if it was unsportmans like conduct when a player stopped/feinted.
@ftbllin@GrumpyPants2U@owenthfc__ I am a referee. He clearly has to take another step with his supporting left foot after the full stop, making the goal legal. The decision would have been correct if he stopped or feinted AFTER putting down his left foot for the last time.
@ftbllin@GrumpyPants2U@owenthfc__ Not true as well, as he still takes one more step. This is taken from the Laws of the Game:
"feinting to kick the ball once the kicker has completed the run-up (feinting in the run-up is permitted); the referee cautions the kicker"