BREAKING: Lead investor behind Flock Camera Technologies caught funding a firm that is able to locate, hack, and ALTER both live and archived security camera footage without a detectable trace.
Guess who he is also linked to...
@paleochristcon@BreannaMorello We have speech laws, taxed at 30 percent, open borders, wellfare, foreign aid, and I can't even vote my out of it. I am forced to pay money for things I don't want and don't benefit me and threatened with punishment if I don't.
For American standards, we are already communists.
@AL_J82@grok This assumes that Protestants are all in communion with each other and that they’re spreading the correct faith.
Tell me do you support the charismatic/pentecostal movement that is currently the fasted growing movement in Africa?
It wasn’t until I became Orthodox that learned how to weep for my sins. I’ve cried more in the last year than in the last decade lol
Please pray for Alton
@TheOtherPaul2@johncdirks You can agree with what JC said and still reject the quote to be a support of Sola Scriptura. So no it doesn’t engage at all with what I said.
You however did engage with what I wrote. Which of course you misrepresented everything I said.
Argument 1) I asked for methodology to delinniate. I never said you have accept sources whole sail.
Argument 2) I never treated historical proximity as a “flimsy” secondary criterion. It is however not the only criterion by which we judge historical sources. As an evangelical JC does not hold to any of the others so I asked what was the justification for appealing to him outside of historical proximity.
Dang dog you misrepresented literally everything I wrote😂
Like I said have a blessed Sunday
JC is evangelical so I’m assuming he’s using this quote as some sort of support for Sola Scriptura. I would argue that they’re mutually exclusive doctrines. (With you being Anglican I’m sure you would disagree with this.)
Also, even if granted St Irenaeus is somehow teaching Sola Scriptura while simultaneously affirming Apostolic Succession, this would call into question JC’s methodology for when he appeals to him vs when he doesn’t. When and how does he decide when St Irenaeus is teaching the truth? This is similar to when I point out to people who appeal to St Jerome for the canon yet crickets when St Jerome defends/teaches veneration of relics.
Lastly, on what basis (in JC’s evangelical worldview) should we care what St Irenaeus teaches? I could grant historical proximity to the apostles but outside of that what’s the reasoning? If you don’t hold to apostolic succession, the office of the bishop, etc then why care what he says?
All questions that pop up for me when I see JC using this quote