$MNQ Loss.
Same problem as $GC
First fill was wrong.
Then I stopped watching the plan.
Had 3 sell limits still working after that
Forgot they were there
Model wanted displacement and a clean shift.
I wanted activity.
Chop paid me for rushing.
The expansion after that wasn't mine
Me vs me again.
Not advice.
$MGC Loss
First trade failed.
That's not the model.
That's me getting itchy after a scratch and no waiting for the actual features.
4HR imbalance and 1HR FVG were there.
I didn't wait for them to matter.
Impatience first.
The chart second.
Not advice.
@Benjamin_SMC Just download data archive of trading socials and journals.
Assign Ai agents roles of tracking Indexing, build on the go and keep tweaking a trading bot that will replace me in market imo.
I would run then.
I passed the @Tradeify 50K eval.
Not a flex.
Same mode. same risk. Stopped fighting the first fill.
$NQ and $Gc.
Eval is labeled. Live is next.
Still me vs me.
Not adivce.
$GC NY. No trade
Funded account locked out personally after passing eval earlier during Asia session.
Sitting on hands on purpose
Chart is practice
$MGC same model
5/5
Rules I actually use.
Risk is set before I click.
No revenge. Learned that the long way.
If NY open is a mess I sit it out.
Most of this is a @Tradeify 50k eval.
Paper gets labelled too.
Not advice.
Your account is not my account.
4/5
What I post.
Bias before I trade.
A recap after, win or loss, same format.
Notes on the NY purge because it wrecks people.
Same models, different days.
I won't call your trades.
I won't only post the clean ones.