@tlarson95425@AukeHoekstra@mzjacobson i didn’t know this, wow, how interesting
he has blocked me too, no idea why
must have been a painful experience being used as a precedent in anti-slapp
@saulkavonic Saul, i suggest an analysis of countries or regions which have achieved excellent local outcomes is in order.
you’ll find leaning in and participating yields results
explore beyond initial knee jerk reactions
@EVCurveFuturist i do wonder at what point people will say openly “we should have considered nuclear all those years ago”
at would point would that be for you?
what differential would lead you to that conclusion?
A tale of two electricity bills:
- mother/carer of severely disabled person, renting, 24/7 care, temp control, oxygen etc
- family of five own 5 bed room home with pool, large subsidised solar/battery system and ongoing subsidies.
$5 pm v $1145 pq
Guess which is which?
@TheHypocrisyCh1@EVCurveFuturist to be honest, i think he is onto something here with France!
extensive nuclear plus renewables is a very good solution (if low emissions the goal)
@EVCurveFuturist given Australian position to back renewables with gas, how do you think that compares long term with France’s plan to back nuclear with renewables?
genuinely curious
@EVCurveFuturist do you not find it a little odd to proclaim that a nation who has achieved a better result with nuclear for many decades than is currently achieved by nations with wind/solar only is somehow doing it wrong?
isn’t there a voice in your head saying “wait a minute” ?