Umberto 🐍 Robina

An alter ego online. The biggest boy in town. I have a big boat and big cojones.

[Eva @evacannnabis]

@svtv_news Пейте латте. Пейте апероль. Ходите на концерты. Смейтесь. Влюбляйтесь. Проводите время с любимыми Жизнь у вас одна, и никто не имеет права назначать вам чувство вины
А когда чел из безопасного места с трагич ебалом объясняет, что им даже кофе пить должно быть стыдно - лицемерие

[Janet Murray @jan_murray]

I wouldn’t normally listen to Ed Sheeran much - if at all.

But I’m putting him on my Spotify playlist today.

Not because I necessarily share his politics (or even know what they are).

But because I object to the cancellation machine: the idea that artists must publicly endorse the approved political position - or face walkouts, denunciations and demands that their work be cancelled.

Sheeran has made clear that he wants his concerts to be welcoming entertainment, not political rallies. That is a perfectly legitimate boundary.

So, Ed Sheeran it is today.
Well done, idiots 🙄

[PeterSweden @PeterSweden7]

It's not "far-right" to protect the borders. It's normal.

It's not "far-right" to reject the woke agenda. It's normal.

It's not "far-right" to embrace your heritage. It's normal.

[Doge Tipping @Dogetothemoon]

Here's the part legacy media don't want you to see.

Elon just demands them keep this part in!

"Interviewer: Can we talk about Europe? You seem very focused on it.

Elon Musk: I am not that focused on Europe. I post about it from time to time.

Interviewer: It is reasonably frequent. As someone who lives in Europe, I am interested because you paint a particular picture. You support not only the populist right, but also parties described as far-right or even fringe in some countries.

Elon Musk: No, I support normal people. What you call the far right is falsely labeled.

Interviewer: You think they are normal people?

Elon Musk: Yes. If you went back ten or fifteen years, these policies would have been completely normal. One thing I find revealing is to take a speech by Obama or Hillary Clinton and ask someone on what I call the lunatic left what they think of it, presenting it as a Trump speech. They would say, “He is the worst person ever.” Then you tell them it was actually Obama or Hillary.

Interviewer: I agree that the political center of gravity has shifted, particularly within the Democratic Party. But I am referring to the people you support in Europe.

Elon Musk: They are normal people. Here are the principles. Tell me which of these sound terrible: secure borders, safe cities, and sensible spending. Which of those is far-right or fringe?

Interviewer: Those principles are not. But I would like to push back.

Elon Musk: I would like to admonish you and the media for the absurd characterization of the far right. It is false, misleading, and nonsense. Please keep this part in. Do not cut this part.

Interviewer: We will keep all of it in, but let me push back."

[𝐿𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑥 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑟 @linuxuser1996]

Countries where a YouTube video critizing EU's Chat Control has been banned.

[Curtis Yarvin @curtis_yarvin]

Patriotism without nationalism is just state-worship.

Praying to the government. Naked obeisance to power. Stockholm syndrome at scale. Modern version of deified Roman emperors, but with bureaucracies. I am vomit

[C3 @C_3C_3]

Sitting down?

Legacy Media increased the term “white supremacy” by 5,296% from 2009-2020.

Violent crimes 2009-2020:

Black on White: 1,162 per 100K Blacks.
White on Black: 38 per 100K Whites.

30X more likely!

Dangers of “white supremacy” narrative is pure propaganda.

Facts.

[Umberto 🐍 Robina @point_singular]

@ZanyZephyrX @jk_rowling You can still train to become a diver. If you were not born a woman you'll never become one.

[Alice Smith @TheAliceSmith]

Equality of outcomes requires vast inequalities of power to attempt it and an unending inequality in power to maintain it.

[The Rabbit Hole @TheRabbitHole]

The rise of white supremacy was a media generated narrative.

This fact is observable:

[DissonantlyCognitive @StarchildPerrin]

@brivael

[ZUBY: @ZubyMusic]

The fact that being 'anti-AC' is an actual political position shows you just how stupid large swathes of humanity are.

It's essentially a pro-death position.

It's as stupid as being against heating in the winter.

[Dissident West @dissidentwest]

@mchmr96 Well if we’re gonna be hated either way, might as well save some money 🤷‍♂️

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

https://t.co/yvJOwOS4xE

[Arthur MacWaters @ArthurMacwaters]

The fix everything button is literally just to arrest criminals and keep them in jail

Bukele was able to do this in a matter of months

When you see the crime and rot in western cities and feel unsafe letting your wife walk around, know that it is a choice.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Beaucoup de figures de gauche, aux US comme en Europe, qualifient Musk d'extrême droite. Certains vont jusqu'au mot « nazi ».

J'ai fait l'inverse de l'accusation : lire avant de juger. Deux biographies. Des dizaines d'heures d'interviews et de documentaires. Zéro once de racisme détectée.

Ce que j'ai trouvé, c'est une obsession constante pour la liberté : rachat de Twitter au nom de la liberté d'expression, réintégration des comptes bannis, publication des Twitter Files, ouverture du code de l'algorithme, open-source de Grok, brevets Tesla libérés en 2014, Starlink rallumé pour les Iraniens coupés du net pendant les manifestations et pour l'Ukraine, refus répété des demandes de censure étatiques.

Maintenant, faisons l'expérience de pensée que ses accusateurs ne font jamais. Imaginez que Musk soit réellement evil.

Cet homme possède un réseau de satellites qui couvre la planète, soit une capacité de surveillance quasi totale. Il possède la place publique numérique la plus influente du monde. Il possède la première fortune à 1000 milliards de l'Histoire, depuis l'IPO de SpaceX le 12 juin. Aucun individu n'a jamais concentré autant de leviers.

Un Musk réellement malveillant, avec ça dans les mains, ne tolérerait pas une seconde qu'on le traite de nazi H24 sur sa propre plateforme. Il bannirait. Il surveillerait. Il écraserait. On serait déjà dans 1984.

Or regardez la réalité : les comptes qui l'accusent de nazisme tweetent toujours. Tous les jours. Sans entrave. Sur son réseau. Avec son algorithme. La dystopie totalitaire qu'on lui prête se démontre par l'absence du goulag.

Voilà le retournement. 1984 le contrôle de la parole, la surveillance de masse, la désignation publique des hérétiques ce n'est pas son projet. C'est le fantasme de ceux qui l'accusent. L'accusation décrit toujours l'accusateur.

C'est du Girard à l'état pur : on désigne un bouc émissaire pour ne pas voir le mécanisme qu'on porte soi-même. Celui qui hurle « nazi » rêve souvent, en silence, du pouvoir de bannir, de ficher, de faire taire.

L'homme qui aurait tous les moyens de bâtir 1984 est précisément celui qui laisse ses pires détracteurs parler. Demandez-vous qui, dans cette histoire, rêve vraiment du télécran.

[Gina Milan @ginamilan_]

Open borders for you.

Bulletproof glass for them.

That’s the Democrat motto.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

The Rape Gang Inquiry Report.

https://t.co/EuKgGWBRhS

[Sovey @SoveyX]

“Name one thing the Republican Party has done for Black Americans?”

Say less, I was built for this question.

• 1863: Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, declaring enslaved people in Confederate-held territory free.
• 1865: Republican-led Congress passed the 13th Amendment, abolishing slavery in the United States.
• 1866: Republican Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, establishing citizenship and equal civil rights.
• 1867: Republican Congress passed the Reconstruction Acts, requiring former Confederate states to protect Black male suffrage before rejoining the Union.
• 1868: The 14th Amendment was ratified, granting birthright citizenship and equal protection under the law.
• 1870: The 15th Amendment was ratified, prohibiting racial discrimination in voting.
• 1870-1871: Enforcement Acts passed to protect Black voting rights from violence.
• 1875: Civil Rights Act passed banning discrimination in public accommodations.
• 1922: House passed Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill to make lynching a federal crime.
• 1957: President Eisenhower signed Civil Rights Act creating Civil Rights Commission.
• 1957: President Eisenhower deployed troops to enforce school desegregation in Little Rock.
• 1960: President Eisenhower signed Civil Rights Act expanding Black voting protections.
• 1969: Nixon administration implemented Philadelphia Plan with minority hiring goals.
• 1969: Nixon administration launched programs supporting Black business and entrepreneurship.
• 1970s-2000s: Republican administrations expanded minority contracting preferences.
• 1983: President Reagan signed law establishing Martin Luther King Jr. Day federal holiday.
• 1991: President George H.W. Bush signed Civil Rights Act expanding discrimination remedies.
• 1996: Republican Congress passed welfare reform with work requirements and time limits.
• 1990s-present: Republican leaders advanced school choice and charter school programs.
• 2001: President George W. Bush signed No Child Left Behind to close achievement gaps.
• 2017: President Trump signed Tax Cuts and Jobs Act creating Opportunity Zones.
• 2018: President Trump signed First Step Act for criminal justice and sentencing reform.
• 2023: Supreme Court struck down race-conscious college admissions, ruling against affirmative action policies at Harvard and UNC.
• 2025: President Trump signed an executive order ending DEI programs, mandates, preferences, and offices across the federal government.
• 2025–2026: Reestablished and expanded the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) focused on excellence, innovation, research competitiveness, and additional grant funding/support.
• 2025–2026: Continued and promoted Opportunity Zones investments aimed at economically distressed communities.
• 2025–2026: Further implementation and follow-on efforts on criminal justice reform (building on First Step Act).

[Bill Ackman @BillAckman]

.@BernieSanders , it is a time to celebrate. @elonmusk has created enormous value for society by building @SpaceX, driving down the cost of rocket launches and creating a global satellite communication network that has brought high speed, low-cost internet and communication access to hundreds of millions and eventually billions of people along with critical advantages for our military and our nation’s defense.

SpaceX and its technologies will cause an acceleration in the growth of wages and wealth creation globally, including in some of the poorest communities in the U.S. and around the world.

Access to low-cost, high speed communications everywhere will allow children around the world to be educated, families to build businesses, and life-saving medical knowledge and care to be available everywhere.

SpaceX will materially bring down the cost of compute, advancing AI and humanity.

Meanwhile, 4,000 SpaceX employees yesterday became millionaires, including hourly wage employees who you claim you are trying to help.

The Elon Musks of the world drive growth, global GDP, and provide access to goods and services at lower cost that would otherwise not exist.

Elon’s nominal trillionaire status is due to his ownership of SpaceX, Tesla, Neuralink, the Boring Company and his other initiatives that have brought new technologies that improve our everyday lives.

Elon is not sitting on a trillion dollar pile of cash, jewelry and gold. He is using his controlling stakes in his companies to advance mankind. Elon’s companies don’t pay dividends. They reinvest all of their capital to accelerate innovation and value creation.

Elon is working 24/7 for all of us. He deserves respect and appreciation, not smears.

Bernie, your socialism would never allow a SpaceX to be built. Socialism has only proven to impoverish mankind and lead to death and destruction.

We need to create the conditions for more SpaceXs to be built, not attack the great entrepreneurs who are helping to advance our country.