The majority of Muslims are not jihadi Salafists, but the majority of Muslims do not theologically disagree with jihadi Salafism.
The difference between "normal" Muslims and the jihadists is not a different interpretation of the faith.
Both sanctify the same man and the same book.
The difference is in the level of commitment, not in the underlying belief.
Think of it by analogy.
The overwhelming bulk of active missionary conversion in Christianity is done by one branch, evangelical, born-again Christianity, with Catholicism as the next largest share.
But while not every Christian or Catholic is a missionary, nearly all of them regard proselytization as an essential part of the faith.
They don't devote their own lives to the mission, yet they approve of it, and they support it wherever they can.
Jihad functions in Islam the way the Great Commission functions in Christianity.
Most believers won't carry it out personally, but they affirm it, they won't condemn it, and the doctrine itself sits at the center of the religion, not the fringe.
After working for 40 years, the average Social Security recipient gets $1850/month.
After being in America for 40 minutes, the average illegal “refugee” gets $3874/month.
And red or blue, that should PISS EVERYONE OFF.
To my friends on the left who welcome the mass import of Islam, what is your favorite part of Islamism? Is it the enslavement of women? The execution of gays?
The stoning of rape victims?
The beheadings? Acid attacks? Pedophilia?
Which of these do you believe will be a net positive for America?
Which of these do you want for your children?
I unironically hate this-- I really do.
Occasional snark on X aside, I want ALL of our citizens who are working hard and playing by the rules to feel welcome here.
BUT. . . this guy is not the big victim here.
The average Americans who have been continuously demographically replaced by traitorous elites with no loyalty to our culture and traditions.
Who have seen their communities and country transformed into something unrecognizable.
Who, when they have raised their voices to object, have been slandered as racists and worse-- they are justifiably angry.
Without their consent, their birthright has been sold for a mess of pottage.
And unfortunately, this guy happens to be a convenient target for that anger.
The ONLY way to solve this is mass deportations of every illegal, an effective moratorium for the near future of 99% of legal immigration, and voluntary remigration incentives for those who aren't making it here or who are causing problems.
ANYTHING ELSE simply fails to address the problem is just going to lead to more anger-- and that anger is justified.
Until the threat of replacement is removed, tensions will run high.
The fewer people we are welcoming, the more generous that welcome can be.
The American people are an big-hearted and friendly people-- probably more open to the stranger than anywhere else in the world.
But enough is enough.
Britain importing millions of migrants and displacing locals is not ethnic cleansing, but returning migrants to their homeland is?
Areas that were English for hundreds of years, where generations built their local communities, are now almost entirely foreign. Is that ethnic cleansing, @hopenothate?
Meet Jamie Varley & John McGowan-Fazakerley, two men who were found GUILTY in the UK of m*rdering and r*ping an 11-MONTH-OLD baby that they adopted together.
Evidence showed that the baby suffered more than 40 injuries, including damage via "forcible penetration" in MULTIPLE locations.
Absolutely HORRIFIC