How the did the bachelorette fire Chris Harrison then let Jesse Palmer defend Taylor Frankie Paul’s allegations with “we only care about what happens on the show”
I don’t want anyone cancelled, I think Taylor needs help. But this is so hypocritical
Listen I don’t think it’s right that Candace is implying Erika Kirk is involved in the assassination of her own husband.
But I do think if Charlie was alive and debating the topic, the last thing he would do is call names and tell people to stop talking.
I’ve thought about the Jay Jones situation and I think two things can be true at once:
1. What he said is pretty crazy. I don’t think that’s something that anyone in office should be okay with and he probably shouldn’t be elected
2. The fact that it was three years ago and just now released after the tragedies that are currently taking place is also wrong. It will encourage more division. Why not release them back when it happened?
Jay is in the wrong as well as whoever held those for years.
If you’re wondering how each political side views the Jimmy Kimmel situation here you go:
**Democratic Party**: Democrats largely support Jimmy Kimmel’s return, viewing his suspension as an attack on free speech and a troubling precedent for media censorship. They argue it reflects a broader Republican effort to suppress dissenting voices.
**Republican Party**: Many Republicans, particularly Trump allies, oppose Kimmel’s return, citing his comments on Charlie Kirk as offensive and justifying his suspension as a market-driven consequence rather than censorship. However, some moderate Republicans express caution, warning against government overreach in limiting free speech.
**Libertarian Party**: Libertarians likely support Kimmel’s return, emphasizing free speech as a core principle and opposing government or corporate interference in media, though specific party statements are scarce. They would argue against FCC pressure as an overstep of authority.
**Green Party**: The Green Party, while not explicitly vocal on Kimmel, would likely back his return, aligning with their stance on protecting free expression and resisting corporate or governmental suppression of progressive voices. Their focus on social justice suggests sympathy for Kimmel’s perspective.
Yes, that's often the case. Social norms evolve, so what was considered acceptable or "normal" humor in one era might be seen as highly offensive today. For instance, certain ethnic or gender-based jokes were common in mid-20th century media but are now widely condemned. Context matters, including the era's cultural standards.