@rynorhn * That also includes monitoring any and all potential labs those entities may try to secretly spring-up within or outside their border. That threat of the opposition cannot exist to any side.
@rynorhn The challenge we have on our hands is in getting to that world, and getting there very quickly. We need 100% monitorability inside all Chinese, US and European AI labs and after that, agreements can happen to make sure everyone is only progressing at a safe speed. Good luck π€
@JDawnScholl@JacquesThibs@hilbertspaess What we really need is new and workable literature on how monitorability could be 100% achieved and garaunteed. That's where the bottleneck and issue is. Suggested policies and agreements could come sure enough, but only once the fundamental problem in monitoring is figured out
@JDawnScholl@JacquesThibs@hilbertspaess This is ultimately why we failed during the cold war on nuclear agreements. The potential policies were more or less obvious. It was purely the fear of the other side continuing nuclear development in secret that ramped up the escalation
@JacquesThibs@hilbertspaess What are your thoughts and suggestions on how cooperation and 100% monitorability can happen on all sides? Because there seems to be a distinct vacuum of decent ideas or progress that I have seen to date, and this needs to have been sorted like yesterday?
@hilbertspaess So what exactly are you suggesting to do about getting China to cooperate in a way that is 100% monitor-able? And visa versa. Because I'm hearing zero suggestions / solutions on this, only problems raised...
@pbakaus Any action taken very necessarily and assuredly needs to happen in China also, otherwise you're not resolving any issue at all: just moving it to a different country; and one that is arguably much worse on safety
@RepBeccaB Any action taken very necessarily and assuredly needs to happen in China also, otherwise you're not resolving any issue at all: just moving it to a different country; and one that is arguably much worse on safety
@Scott_Wiener Any action taken very necessarily and assuredly needs to happen in China also, otherwise you're not resolving any issue at all: just moving it to a different country; and one that is arguably much worse on safety
@SenSanders Any action taken very necessarily and assuredly needs to happen in China also, otherwise you're not resolving any issue at all: just moving it to a different country; and one that is arguably much worse on safety
@PatRyanUC Any action taken very necessarily and assuredly needs to happen in China also, otherwise you're not resolving any issue at all: just moving it to a different country; and one that is arguably much worse on safety
@StephenFarryUU Any action taken very necessarily and assuredly needs to happen in China also, otherwise you're not resolving any issue at all: just moving it to a different country; and one that is arguably much worse on safety. But how on earth do you get there??
@_perloj Any action taken very necessarily and assuredly needs to happen in China also, otherwise you're not resolving any issue at all: just moving it to a different country; and one that is arguably much worse on safety
@SenMarkKelly Any action taken very necessarily and assuredly needs to happen in China also, otherwise you're not resolving any issue at all: just moving it to a different country; and one that is arguably much worse on safety
@GaryMarcus Any action taken very necessarily and assuredly needs to happen in China also, otherwise you're not resolving any issue at all: just moving it to a different country; and one that is arguably much worse on safety
@mattshumer_ Any action taken very necessarily and assuredly needs to happen in China also, otherwise you're not resolving any issue at all: just moving it to a different country; and one that is arguably much worse on safety