@libsoftiktok Dallas and ft Worth cops are douches. They also hassle people for carrying even with a license despite it being a state law allowing it. The big cities in TX are overrun with leftist bullshit sadly.
Hello Mrs. Owens,
You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk."
He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it.
You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it.
You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days.
You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater.
You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu.
You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name.
And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely.
Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him.
So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath.
Every single one failed.
I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow.
The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts.
I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.
Sitting down?
Legacy Media increased the term “white supremacy” by 5,296% from 2009-2020.
Violent crimes 2009-2020:
Black on White: 1,162 per 100K Blacks.
White on Black: 38 per 100K Whites.
30X more likely!
Dangers of “white supremacy” narrative is pure propaganda.
Facts.
Can we just note this—The Bulwark and the New York Times heavily implied that Pete Hegseth’s tattoos that had nothing to do with being a Nazi were a massive red flag while Graham Platner’s actual Nazi tattoo was no big deal.
They ran interference for a man who had at one point so embraced Nazi ideology that he permanently marked his body with their most extreme symbol while at the same time heavily implying that a man who has never had anything to do with Nazis and roundly condemns them was guilty of white supremacy because of vibes.
The hypocrisy would be insane if it weren’t so predictable.
A 2017 case study of a boy who was put on puberty blockers shows a significant drop in intellectual capacity: a 15 point drop in verbal comprehension, a 10 point drop in global IQ, and a 9 point loss in working memory.
Make no mistake: blockers have had a significant, devastating impact on this boy’s intelligence. That 10-15 points could be the difference between graduating from college and not, or between going to college and not; or even between living independently and not. This child’s life has been forever altered, his mental abilities forever limited, all so that he can more effectively imitate the opposite sex.
The intellectual damage being done to these kids is the worst of it, but IQ is by no means the only thing they lose when taking this medication. Dr. Marci Bowers, president of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, was recorded admitting that blockers destroy a child’s ability to experience arousal and orgasm in adulthood so effectively that 100% of boys who take them between the ages of 9 and 11 are affected in this manner.
Puberty blockers destroy children’s futures. They are toxic, dangerous drugs that are otherwise prescribed either as medications of last resort to treat aggressive prostate cancer, or as chemical castration medication for sex offenders. They are so toxic, in fact, that the sex offenders who are ordered to take them are often taken off of them by doctors’ orders so as to preserve their health. Prescribing them to children in order to treat a condition that resolves itself 84% of the time is insanity.
And let’s be honest – that’s not why these kids are being given this medication. They are being given this medication because the adult transvestites who control the narrative resent the fact that they themselves have trouble passing. They are willing to destroy these childrens’ intellectual and sexual futures in order to make them more effective mimics of the opposite sex.
Now the UK is running a puberty blocker trial. The children who participate will be irrevocably harmed in the process — and the people running study know this. The data is already in, and to continue destroying children’s futures as a sop to trans-identifying adults is inexcusable.
As a Native American I’m a little offended that the 14th Amendment didn’t grant us citizenship until Congress passed an exception for us. Meanwhile, a CCP spy can fly to Guam, drop a baby and fly home with the baby who qualifies to run for president 35 years later.
The Trump Admin and all future Admins will have full justification to turn around and send back to their home countries any pregnant female who seeks to enter the U.S. at Ports of Entry.
Maybe we should set up medical clinics at U.S. Embassies around the world, and make it mandatory for females seeking a visa to undergo a pregnancy test, and then only allow a visa to be valid for entry into the U.S. for 72 hours after the date of the test.
Why would this not be considered a valid alternative to the EO in order to address the problem of birther tourism?
The Birthright Citizenship decision is bad for the same reason Roe v Wade was bad:
It infers an intention behind the Amendment that its authors never stated nor intended.
It will eventually be overturned for the same reason.
If we still have a country then.