“There are two kinds of smart people: those who take simple things and make them sound complicated, and those who take complicated things and make them sound simple. Be the second kind.” - Willie Anthony Jones, R.I.P. https://t.co/3fNKPc4NwL
The US National Science Foundation (NSF) — a major funder of basic research — has restricted the flow of new research grants to a group of elite universities, Nature has learnt.
https://t.co/dUcCrJh4Dm
AI is changing how employers hire workers.
Today we are publishing our research over the past four years into this high-stakes application of AI.
We independently studied the impacts of deployed AI hiring tools based on the real outcomes for 3.3 million people.
there's some really interesting commentary from one of the mathematicians in the companion paper
not to pour cold water on the results necessarily - but it suggests this is a specific "kind" of proof these models might be particularly good at
This has been shown to be concentrated in routine-cognitive white collar occupations. The challenge we highlight is that GenAI exposure is super strongly correlated with WFH exposure, posing a challenge for empirical analysis.
Hello @JeffBezos, since you question the results of our studies on the unfairness of the US tax system, please allow me to remind you of the main conclusions of our work, the most comprehensive research to date on this issue.
I am leaving the Washington Post to join a new journalistic venture backed by Politico founder Robert Allbritton that will be both the hometown publication the D.C. region sorely needs and a scrappy and fearless national news organization. I hope you'll join us.
@Gonzalez4NY@SenGonzalezNY Okay, found + read the bill. I dunno, still seems a little unclear how this will be interpreted/adjudicated in practice. Still seems like there's a lot of leeway to interpret the law overly broadly. Need to mull it over more/reread/discuss with friends
https://t.co/7p5abtnPH0
At the end of January I started a "living document" tracking the impact of AI on productivity. I highlighted a disconnect: while micro studies showed a clear boost, the macro evidence was muted. I wrote that I expected this to change in the near term. Apparently "near term" is a bit over a month.
The post has been updated with almost a dozen new studies, on benchmarks, new tasks, etc. Importantly, updates to the aggregate data are also showing what looks like AI productivity gains. It is still early days, but worth noting.
See post here: https://t.co/AtsqhaHzT9
No administration of my lifetime has been more antagonistic toward the private sector, free markets, and free trade. All the warnings of socialists and Democratic overreaches and government intrusion — it's all worse in reality right now than ever before. Just remarkable.
If you make a stupid decision and cause 4000 workers to lose their jobs, I think something worse than getting criticized on twitter should happen to you
$XYZ's headcount will revert back to pre-COVID levels at 6,000 employees.
Here is Jack's stupidity in headcount over the years.
2019: 3,835
2020: 5,477
2021: 8,521
2022: 12,428
2023: 12,985
2024: 11,372
2025: 10-12,000
He's using AI as a excuse to mask his failure