No, mate, I donโt think defending Russell Brand & obsessively posting a pic youโve made of my face with a cock jutting into my mouth many times on your timeline makes you look at all rapey & insane.
@HeatherTomli Thatโs not actually giving consent though: I can say that I want to make chilli for tea (for example) and this can be agreed, but I can actually decide not to do that. From verbal reasoning expressing interest in doing one thing or another is not a pre-requisite for an action.
What defenders of Brand canโt seem to get their heads round is he was unable to call a single witness to testify on his behalf. No-one to contradict the prosecutionโs case other than himself & his wife. While former friends & employees were prepared to testify against him. It was this that damned him. It wasnโt โhe said/she saidโ. People who knew him well spoke *against* him. None for him.
@rk_wiggs Yeah itโs funny that cultural difference. I will likely be applying to both CoE and RC schools for my kids, but then both are quite establishment and authority orientated vis-a-vis evangelical baptism.
This is extremely hard to watch, but the judge is doing a tremendous job of laying it all out calmly and coldly. Really drives home how bad his crimes were.
A California couple with 27 children, most born via surrogates, have been charged in what US authorities have described as a "house of horrors" abuse case.
Sky's @marthakelner examines the case in California - and what it means for the multibillion-dollar surrogacy industry.