Take the World Cup qualifiers seriously, dem nor gree listen.
They’re now playing street football across Nigeria while their mates are in Mexico, Canada and USA.
🚨📲 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Katia Aveiro (Cristiano Ronaldo’s sister) on Instagram.
“Magically, they forgot how to:
• Pass the ball around
• Win the ball back
• Launch counter-attacks
The game became all about passing backwards in midfield…
Strange World Cup.
Very strange.
🇵🇹”
Let me do a little football argument today, Mr Bayo:
You are free to love Ronaldo, but you cannot make an argument that he is greater than Messi.
What metrics do you want to measure with? Messi beats Ronaldo across the board.
But let’s flip their records. Would Messi still be greater than Cristiano Ronaldo if:
Messi had 35 trophies, while Ronaldo had 46, the highest in the world?
Messi had five Ballon d’Ors, while Ronaldo had eight?
Messi had 8 domestic titles, while Ronaldo had 13+?
Messi had just the Euros and two Nations Leagues, while Ronaldo had a World Cup, two Copas, one Olympic medal, and one Finalissima?
Messi had 2 FIFA The Best awards, while Ronaldo had 3?
Messi had 4 Golden Shoes, while Ronaldo had 6?
Messi had 0 World Cup Golden Balls, while Ronaldo had 2?
Messi had 0 World Cup Golden Boots, while Ronaldo had 1?
Messi had 960+ goals, while Ronaldo had 900+, but also the most assists, dribbles, and chances created, while playing two fewer years than him?
Messi had 5 Champions League titles, while Ronaldo had 4?
Messi had 0 Laureus Sports Awards, while Ronaldo had 1, the only footballer to win it?
I could go on and on. But even in that scenario, Ronaldo fans would still not concede that Messi is better.
But that is the reality we have here.
The whole of football knows Messi is both better and greater.
Ronaldo’s teammates attest to this. Messi’s teammates attest to this.
Top coaches in the world attest to it:
Pep Guardiola
Jürgen Klopp
Arsène Wenger
José Mourinho
Etc.
Legends of football attest to it, and their careers attest to it.
Messi is 39, and he is still playing with the highest creative and playmaking responsibility on the pitch.
Ronaldo shifted from the wings to the box as early as 2015–2018.
Now they are both at the twilight of their careers, and we see one still actively dictating play, while the other has become a shadow of his former self.
Messi is better and greater than Ronaldo in all regards.
Love tweets like this that are rooted in lived experience rather than the wishful, theoretical, idealistic slop that dominates this app these days.
That said, permit me to add that without them not understanding boundaries, or more precisely, distinguishing between a favour and an obligation (do something once for them and they expect it indefinitely) they are also highly impressionable and so have a tendency to import behaviours, expectations and standards from their environment (Nolly/Hollywood, social media, podcasts, pop culture, friends) directly into their relationships and marriages.
And this tendency is remarkably universal. So it makes little difference whether she is "good" or bad, a virgin or not, nor does it matter whether you are highly masculine or emasculated. She will *ATTEMPT* to import them regardless.
For example, your woman may watch a brain rotting youtube Nollywood movie on post partum depression, get emotionally invested in it and then attempt to make it a 'conversation' with you.
'Conversation' in quotes because it isn't really dialogue she seeks but confirmation from you of what her idea of PPD is and what you will do if it happens to you and she begins acting like what she saw in the Nollywood slop that has fried her brain.
Completely ignore her because attempting to engage will be a waste of time at that point. Make that occassion a reminder that you do not take her seriously on serious matters. She will get angry momentarily and sulk. Allow her.
Another example is how she may watch a woman weaponise sex on TV and even if you've never begged for sex from her before, if you offend her, she may say something like "I regret giving you this bunda today. Come and ask for it again and see. You will beg and I will not give you"
It may sound like she's joking but all jokes reveal thinking and imagination so your response is what will determine whether or not that thought translates into action - so do not ignore it.
Without becoming defensive or emotional, remind her in definite unequivocal terms that you do not beg for pum and will never beg for pum.
Seeing that, unlike the dodoyos in the Nollywood slop she consumes, that threat will not work with you, she may then pivot from threatening to accusing: "Ehen now, that is because you have Cynthia and Amaka that you've been cheating on me with... no problem"
Essentially switching from one shit test to another
But that is the response you want, so neither deny nor affirm it. That is the impression of you you want her to *CONTINUOUSLY have; a man who has options - never a man who does not BECAUSE women treat men with options a billion times better than men without.
See, your woman will test your frame *CONSTANTLY* - sometimes consciously, most times unconcsciously - but everyday and twice on Sundays, she will test it. Whether or not you recognise these test when they come and are able to 'pass' them *EFFORTLESSLY* is the difference maker between whether you get the best version of her or the worst one.
There is no such thing as a 'good woman'. At best, what you can get is a woman you have *CONDITIONED* to be good to YOU.
And that conditioning does not end. The day you snooze, you will lose.
The reason dressing should be your first (and most reliable) vetting stick as a man when judging women is this:
it is the one area where a woman’s prolonged pretense is unsustainable (and frankly not worth it to her).
Think about it.
Even if you are a potential romantic partner and she discovers that you’re judging her by her dressing, what’s she gonna do?
Change her wardrobe? (You’re not worth it)
Delete her socials? (You’re not worth it)
Modify the kind of clothes she buys?
(You’re frankly not worth it enough unless she judges that you’re a multi-millionaire who can already give her the kind of life she wants, because her clothing are A MEANS TO AN END.)
This is why they resort to shaming tactics (you’re controlling or insecure).
Since they know they can’t change, they try to change you.
Because for hoes, sensuality is not just male attention but currency. It is the means by which they lure weak men to secure access to his resources and their survival.
@CFCCatalyst@cknze1 She’s been moving that way, maybe the change this time was the guy was prolly tired of her ass and decided not to apologize as usual.
@Erinayoooo It called “permission effect”
Besides, it’s what she wants to receive and not what she’s giving, so people will start brainstorming and it fair.