The powerful army of Assam checked Islamic invaders for centuries. They defeated the Khiljis, Tughlaks, Bengal Sultanate and Aurangzeb. All this was carefully kept out of our history books by the secular distorians.
In 1682, the Ahoms defeated the Mughal Army in a final titanic clash. The Islamic invaders suffered such appalling losses that they never again looked in the direction of Assam.
Watch how the Assamese warriors led by Lasit Borphukan defended their kingdom.
@DilipKu24388061 उनके आंसू बहाने के पीछे की मंशा यह थी कि वह बाबर की आत्मा को बताना चाहती थीं कि आपके छोड़े हुए अधूरे काम को अभी हमारे खानदान ने पूर्ण रूप से पूरा नहीं किया है जिसका हमें अपार दुख है और हो सके तो आप हमें क्षमा कर दीजिएगा..!
@AsYouNotWish@RatanSharda55 The point is not what happened to Kashmiri Hindus—the whole world knows what occurred—but rather, what have we, as Indian nationalists, learned from it?
@pakistan_untold Pakistanis ought to be grateful to Gandhi and Nehru for this; yet, quite the opposite is happening—attempts are still being made in India to engage in politics in their names, in a sphere where there should have been no place for either of them...!
@scribe9104 हमारे देश में जिस प्रकार से पृथ्वीराज चौहान, महाराणा प्रताप और छत्रपति शिवाजी जैसे वीरों का इतिहास है उसी प्रकार जयचंद और मानसिंहों का भी इतिहास है, ऐसे लोग भी इस धरती पर हमेशा रहे हैं और वर्तमान में भी हैं और इनसे निजात पाने का अभी कोई ठोस प्रयास नहीं हो पा रहा है...
Professor K. S. Narayanacharya, in his book, presents a number of claims and arguments.
It is often claimed by some that Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi had Muslim ancestry. However, according to the text, far fewer people are aware of what it alleges about Mahatma Gandhi's family background. It then presents the following assertions:
1. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was the son of Putlibai, the fourth wife of Karamchand Gandhi.
The text claims that Putlibai originally belonged to the Pranami sect and further alleges that this sect was an Islamic organization disguised in Hindu attire.
2. It cites Mr. Ghosh's book *The Quran and the Kafir*, claiming that Gandhi's origins are discussed there.
According to the text, Karamchand Gandhi worked for a Muslim landlord. It alleges that he stole money from his employer and fled. It further claims that the landlord then took Karamchand's fourth wife, Putlibai, into his household as his wife, and that Karamchand remained in hiding for three years before Mohandas Gandhi was born.
3. The text claims that Gandhi was born and raised among Gujarati Muslims.
4. It further alleges that the expenses for Gandhi's education, including his studies at law college in London, were paid by his Muslim father.
5. It also claims that Muslims helped Gandhi establish his legal practice in South Africa.
6. According to the text, Gandhi was associated with the Anjuman-e-Islamia organization while in London.
The passage then argues that these claims explain what it describes as Gandhi's pro-Muslim inclination.
It goes on to attribute the following statements to Gandhi:
• "Even if Hindus are killed by Muslims, Hindus should remain silent and should not be angry with them."
• "We should not fear death."
• "Let us embrace a heroic death."
The passage asks what these statements imply and argues that Gandhi never adopted a pro-Hindu position during the freedom struggle, instead repeatedly speaking in favor of Muslims.
It also claims that Gandhi refused to sign a petition seeking clemency for Bhagat Singh and other revolutionaries before their execution, adding that Annie Besant criticized him for this.
The passage further lists the following allegations regarding Gandhi:
1. He defended Abdul Rashid, the assassin of Swami Shraddhanand.
2. He supported the Khilafat Movement in Turkey, which, according to the text, led Dr. K. B. Hedgewar to sever ties with Gandhi and establish the RSS.
3. Despite Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel allegedly having majority support, the text claims Gandhi ensured that Jawaharlal Nehru became India's first Prime Minister. It also alleges that Nehru was a Muslim and that the title "Pandit" was used to mislead the public.
4. It claims Gandhi went on a fast to pressure the government into releasing ₹55 crore to Pakistan after Partition.
5. Finally, the passage alleges that Gandhi consistently appeased Muslims, insulted Hindus, and reduced Hindus to second-class citizens in India, claiming that this approach has continued through politicians who follow Gandhian ideology.
@RapperPandit History repeats itself sooner or later, and in this course of events, Pakistanis too will eventually realize that their ancestors were once part of the *Sanatan* tradition; whenever this realization dawns, the history of this land will change....