primrosehill2011

[Duchess of SoHoSex @J18149952]

#FormerRoyals #neverforget #markled #HarryAndMeghanMountbattenWindsor

[Cleo @Cleorio1991]

https://t.co/RgvcC1tLW6

[Theroyalfamily.wcgcl 👑🇬🇧 @lovewalesfamily]

The Prince and Princess of Wales will attend the Omani State Visit tomorrow 🇴🇲🇬🇧😍

[Cricket 🏏🦕⚓️🏆 @cricketmum27]

This was her goodbye to her subjects. Now we have her filthy grandson and his grubby wife shitting all over her legacy.

@RoyalFamily Remove them from the Website. Remove Henry from councillor of state & strip their titles.

@KensingtonRoyal @ClarenceHouse Do better! Diana’s 2nd son has soiled her legacy. Don’t let it happen with the world’s longest reigning monarch Queen Elizabeth II.

KC3 buy some cement and harden the fuck up and deal out the consequences of Hugs & Drugs actions.

[Anna @tokkianami]

Prince William will lead tributes to Sir Kevin Sinfield in a special BBC Breakfast documentary on BBC One on Monday, 26th October, for his remarkable fundraising for the MND community after taking on seven incredible challenges over seven years.

🎥 BBC Breakfast

[Queer Lips of Truth II 🇸🇱🇬🇧 @QLoTII]

Something needs saying plainly because the media keeps forgetting it.

Harry and Meghan are private citizens.

Not 'non-working royals.' Not 'royals in exile.' Not 'the Sussexes stepping out.' Private citizens. They chose it in 2020. They told Oprah why. They moved back in August with no plans to resume duties. And last month the Lord Chamberlain wrote it down so there could be no confusion: no royal role, no duties, no claim.

So what was Nottingham? What's a tuxedo with medals on at Greenwich? What's standing next to the Irish Guards band, Catherine's regiment, for the pool photographer? What's turning up alone at the rugby, Catherine's patronage, and having a 'source' tell Hello! the kids would love to come once the security is 'sorted'? What's a 'sorry' floated through the Express without actually saying sorry?

It's an application. For the thing they gave up. Royal adjacency without royal duty. The crowds, the flowers, the cameras, the police escort, the family's name over the door, and none of the Tuesdays in Peterhead or the 532 engagements a year the King did in cancer treatment.

And we cannot give it to them. Not the public, not the papers, not the Home Office, not the family. Because the moment you reward leaving, then performing the job you left, for free, in the same city, with a fan club bringing the flowers, you've told every future royal that the door swings both ways and the perks are portable. It isn't and they aren't. That's the whole deal. You're in or you're out.

One more thing. Meghan is 45. She's the oldest of the four. Older than William, older than Catherine, older than Harry. She is not the ingénue in this story, whatever the tears at a bouquet are meant to suggest. She's a grown woman who's made every choice on this list and now wants the one thing those choices cost her.

Private citizens. Enjoy Nottingham. Pay for your own security like the rest of us, and the next time a working royal is on a bus in Sussex with a 94 year old, notice the difference. That's the job. They didn't want it. They don't get the bits that come with it.

[Queer Lips of Truth II 🇸🇱🇬🇧 @QLoTII]

Harry and Meghan are private citizens.

Not 'non-working royals.' Not 'royals in exile.' Not 'the Sussexes stepping out.' Private citizens. They chose it in 2020. They told Oprah why. They moved back in August with no plans to resume duties. And last month the Lord Chamberlain wrote it down so there could be no confusion: no royal role, no duties, no claim.

[RoyalBee @123workerbee]

Through friends Harry has said they “ never agreed they wouldn’t be half in half out” and “ the decision was made and foisted upon them.”

His “beloved” granny (he is supposed to have loved so much) is the one who “foisted” that decision upon them.

Every time they speak and get paid, not because they are experts, but because they are royal connected, they are traitors to Queen Elizabeth II, her legacy and the monarchy she protected.

Every time As Ever sells a jar of jam, they are traitors to his granny’s edict.

Every time they do a royal engagement, it’s his granny who is being disrespected and mocked.

They ARE half in half out. I guess they feel she’s dead now. What can she do?

Never forget how they treated her at the end and how they disrespect her now.

[Canellecitadelle @Canellelabelle]

"He is known for his friendship with Meghan Markle, but Roland Mouret revealed it was the Princess of Wales he kept in mind: 'She represents the way a woman grows, the way a woman stands not behind but beside. That sense of equality she has created; she's powerful'"🔥The end💅🏽

[Pinky’s Tea Party 💖 👑🫶💕 @Ir10Reen]

This is a bad look!

[TheOnlyDuchess @TheOnlyDuchess6]

Royal Biographer Tom Bower described their outing as a "catastrophe" for the Royal Family and argued Dumbo & Markle are "determined to grab the spotlight", despite being non-working royals.

"I think the Royal Family does need to put them down because the challenges over the next months will be to undermine the King, target William and Kate and promote themselves"
https://t.co/vufm8x2GCt

[According2Taz @according2_taz]

So it’s confirmed Nottingham police did provide 3 support officers, one unmarked police car and one traffic police car. A friend of Harry & Meghan told Alison Boshoff this;

‘They can achieve great support for charities and intend to do so. There will be more days like going forward.
For security reasons it had the shape of a royal event but that is because, ultimately, that is who they are.’

There you have it. They have absolutely no intentions of stopping these pseudo Royal visits, no doubt clashing with the working Royals. They have made their intentions very clear.

They are not behaving like private citizens and a clearer distinction must be put in place. Get them off the Royal Family website, remove Harry officially as a Counsellor of State and remove the Dukedom. They have already said that they have no intention of following the Sandringham agreement and that it was ‘foisted on them’ and they never agreed. They are very much declaring war against the Royals again, but this time they are not hiding it. They didn’t come back to make peace, they didn’t come back for the children to have a relationship with the King (who’s seen them once), they have come back to create drama and make money off their Royal status.

They are using taxpayers money, they are cashing in on their charitable appearances and this will reflect badly on the King if he does nothing, because they will damage public support for the Monarchy in the long run.

https://t.co/meZx0WtcgN

[JE May @storiesbyjemay]

'Freebie mixup' Meghan had to be reminded to return a free designer dress. Meghan has history of keeping loaners and show wardrobe documented as far back as her Reitman's commercial. The shoes she kept without authorization reappeared, dirty, as her footwear of choice for her engagement announcement. There were reports of Meghan asking designers for freebies and Buckingham Palace having to return them. So it was humiliating to Meghan when Roland Mouret's staff inadvertently (?) let Kensington Palace (Catherine"s staff) know that Meghan had borrowed a dress and failed to return it. Catherine pays for all of her clothes and doesn't accept freebies from designers.

[jen @JenCarsonTaylor]

This is Prince William in a nutshell. He is fiercely loyal, kind, compassionate.

“It was like someone had put a key in a lock and opened it without me giving permission to do that … You just feel everyone’s pain, everyone’s suffering…”

[PrivateCitizen 𝐁𝐞𝐠𝐠𝐡𝐚𝐧 Duchess-No-More @TheFakeDouchass]

Today, the international press is reporting footage of a lady that heckled Harry & Meghan in Nottingham. Apparently, the British press is banned from reporting on the incident.🤭
Now circulating on social media.👇
Thank you, QLoT

[Royal Thoughts - Parody and Commentary @InsightfulWatch]

As if the footage from ground level was not telling enough then we see this.

In their wildest dreams Harry and Meghan’s most ardent enemies could not have planned such a spectacularly richly deserved and deliciously humiliating downfall as they have created for themselves.

I am loving every last second of this. 🍿🥂

[FAN of the Prince & Princess of Wales @TribesBritannia]

I love the fact the Princess of Wales waited for today to launch news of the new @Earlychildhood project today. Her warm and genuine film about why nature is so important to children, gave a very different perspective for people who were just watching the trolls.
I’ve said it before and I will say it again, there is no competition going on. There are working Royals performing their duties, then there are the serial failures desperate for cash. The press is profiting off of it all by inventing fake scenarios and riling people up deliberately.
Don’t fall for it.

[Queer Lips of Truth II 🇸🇱🇬🇧 @QLoTII]

EXCLUSIVE 🚨

Roland Mouret's memoir is out next week and there's a Meghan chapter. Of course there is.

This is the man who dressed her before anyone cared. The 'man in a bathrobe' who said he loved dressing her, in her own telling. He did the dress she wore the night before her wedding. He defended her rewearing clothes as 'sustainability' when the papers mocked it. Friend of ten years.

Then, he says, one of his staff made a mistake and asked for some free dresses back. Meghan, embarrassed, erupted. He apologised. She didn't take it. 'You know now I can never wear your clothes again.' Ten years, one admin error, done. He's careful to add: that decision was hers. Not the Palace's. Not anyone else's. Hers.

And then the line that will follow her around. He messaged her later to say he could understand if she didn't wear his stuff, but wearing a cheap copy of it was ridiculous.

A cheap copy. Of her friend's dress. To make a point.

Same pattern as everything else. Her father. Her first husband. Her agent. Her staff. The Palace. Now the designer who dressed her for a decade. Everyone who gets close ends up on the other side of a door, and every one of them, when they finally talk, says the same thing: it was her call.

The best bit? 'Never again' lasted until she needed a dress. She rewore his strapless number for an As Ever launch last October and again for a Valentine's post this year. Turns out the principle had a shelf life. The jam needed selling.

Nobody in Montecito will comment. They never do when it's a friend.

[Queen Esther @XOQueenEsther]

In my opinion, Meghan’s reaction says far more about her than the mix-up itself. An assistant mistakenly contacting Catherine’s stylist about returning gifted clothes was an embarrassing administrative blunder, not some calculated attack. But if, as Roland Mouret claims, Meghan reacted with that much anger, I have to wonder what really stung her.

Was it the mistake itself, or the fact that Catherine’s team was now involved?

Because if the mere fact that Catherine’s stylist knew about the situation was enough to make Meghan feel humiliated, that suggests a woman far too conscious of how she measures up against Catherine. It comes across as insecurity, an unhealthy need to control the narrative, and perhaps a rivalry that Catherine herself has never shown any interest in entertaining.

What makes this particularly telling, in my opinion, is the apparent all-or-nothing reaction: one mistake, one offended ego, and suddenly a friendship and an entire designer’s wardrobe are being thrown away. Why turn an easily resolved misunderstanding into such a dramatic personal affront?

When you are genuinely secure in yourself, another woman’s existence in the same room does not threaten your dignity.

And that is what makes the Catherine angle so interesting to me. Catherine has spent years building relationships without needing to turn every slight into a battle. If Meghan genuinely felt exposed simply because Catherine’s circle became aware of something she would rather have kept private, it raises an uncomfortable question: why does Catherine’s awareness carry so much weight?

Perhaps it was embarrassment. Perhaps it was wounded pride. But to me, the reaction described in Mouret’s account suggests someone who may be far more preoccupied with appearances, status and comparison than she would ever admit.

The irony? Nobody needed to humiliate Meghan. A simple mix-up apparently did the job. And if Catherine’s name alone made that embarrassment feel so much worse, perhaps the real competition was never coming from Catherine at all.

https://t.co/zPijF72ubt