@realannapaulina Please declassify and release the following: 1. CIA Operational Files – Especially Mexico City. 2. CIA Files on George Joannides. 3. FBI Surveillance and Informant Reports. 4. Records of CIA “201 Files” on Suspected Co-Conspirators. 5. Presidential Records – LBJ and Nixon. Thanks
Our government has known for 79 years.
And they told us nothing.
Objects moving in ways nothing we build can...
Circling the one place on Earth we'd never want them.
This should bother you.
From the 4th release of UAP files on https://t.co/eVsTscv8Kh under PURSUE: "DOW-UAP-PR116, Unresolved UAP Report, Atlantic Ocean, 2020"
@USNorthernCmd submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (@DoW_AARO) consisting of 32 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020.
An accompanying Range Fouler Debrief, DOW-UAP-D091, describes the phenomenon as “darker, maroonish color, approximately 12-15 feet in height.” The report describes the phenomenon “travel[ing] with the wind” and noted that it did not “maneuver or change direction.” It also describes the phenomenon as appearing similar to a “large, somewhat deformed balloon.”
https://t.co/AvKS3mK5e4
Notable new Navy infrared video of UAP. Eastern US 2015 is same era & corridor as GIMBAL & GOFAST, shot by Roosevelt F/A-18 crews off the East Coast that January. @uncertainvector testified his squadron began detecting UAP near Virginia Beach in 2014, sightings so routine one crew took evasive action to avoid a collision.
BREAKING: The Pentagon has released a fourth batch of UFO documents and videos, including what officials describe as the clearest footage yet—showing a large two-tiered object captured by an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020.
🇺🇸 Kevin O’Leary revealed Elon’s real superpower, and it’s not what you think.
“It’s not his intelligence. It’s not his money.
It’s his almost inhuman ability to focus on what matters and completely tune out everything else.”
While most people get distracted by 12 different things, Elon stays locked in.
That single habit is why he keeps shipping at lightspeed.
The edge almost nobody can copy 🔥
Writer: Val
Satya Nadella just gave away Microsoft's real AI plan.
It is not to make Word a little smarter.
It is to turn every company's memory into the control layer before Salesforce, ServiceNow, Notion, and every AI wrapper can get there.
Within the first two minutes at Davos, he explained why most companies will buy AI seats and still wonder where the productivity went.
His exact words:
"Think about it, it's a complete inversion of how information is flowing in the organization."
Then the real line:
"The intelligence layer is only as good as the context you give it."
That is the part most founders should stop on.
The AI product is not the chat box.
The AI product is the company context underneath the chat box.
Nadella gives a tiny example from his own work. Before Davos, he says he had about 50 bilateral meetings to prep for. For decades, the workflow was basically the same: field teams prepared notes, HQ refined them, information traveled upward.
He says nothing had really changed since he joined Microsoft in 1992.
Now he asks Copilot for the brief.
But the useful part is not that Copilot writes a memo faster. That is table stakes.
The useful part is that it knows the 360: what Microsoft is doing with the other party as a client, what the other party is doing with Microsoft as a client, and what sits cleanly as an investment.
That is context custody.
If Microsoft owns the email, calendar, files, meetings, chats, permissions, CRM connectors, and briefing workflow, it gets to route the work before a point solution even sees the task.
This is why the pricing matters.
Microsoft's current Business Standard with Copilot plan shows $32 per user per month, paid yearly. That sounds like a seat license. It is really a toll for entering the company memory layer.
And the scale is not small. Microsoft did $281.7B in FY2025 revenue. Azure crossed $75B. Microsoft Cloud hit $46.7B in one quarter.
The obvious story is model competition.
The less obvious story is workflow possession.
The old Microsoft playbook was never just app bundling. Windows owned the machine. Office owned the document. Exchange owned the inbox. Teams owned the meeting.
Copilot wants to own the connective tissue between all of them.
The chatbot is the reception desk. The building is the company memory inside Microsoft Graph.
That is why the second-order consequence is uncomfortable:
If AI really flattens information flow, the org chart becomes negotiable.
Middle layers that existed to collect, summarize, route, and escalate information start looking like latency. Departments that hoard context become bottlenecks. Vendors that only own one record of truth become features in somebody else's workflow.
This is also where a lot of AI ROI pilots will fail.
Companies will buy the tool and keep the old information plumbing. Then they will blame the model.
Nadella is saying the opposite: the model only becomes valuable after the workflow changes around it.
My bet for the next 18 months:
The winners in enterprise AI will not be the companies with the most demos. They will be the companies that clean up permissions, context, and internal handoffs fast enough for AI to become the operating layer.
That is much harder than buying licenses.
And much more valuable.
Founders: if you want your X to do this for your business, check the first reply.
STEVE JOBS GOT FIRED FROM APPLE.
Then he walked straight into MIT and dropped the most raw, unfiltered 60-minute business masterclass ever recorded.
Zero PR bullshit. Zero image to protect.
Just pure, brutal honesty from the man who built Apple once and was about to rebuild it even bigger. Stop scrolling.
Watch this tonight instead of Netflix.
Bookmark it. Come back to it.
NASA's chief administrator confirmed in a bombshell interview that the space agency has taken images of objects which can only be described as UFOs https://t.co/rGwQp1B9sc 🔗
An outstanding article from Liberation Times regarding the fantastic work by @DrBeaVillarroel and her team on the transients. Recent papers have laid waste to @Wellesley college Professor Wes Watters' paper trying to debunk Beatriz.
Multiple sources have also alleged to me that Wes has worked behind the scenes to try and undermine her work and reputation, which if true, seriously calls into question Wes' motives. Any academic trying to damage the reputation of another scientist is obscene.
Read Here👇
https://t.co/oWpYXHhABM
Andrew Huberman prays every day, on his knees before important things and before sleep.
The neuroscientist started reading the Bible a few years ago and found deep wisdom in it.
As a scientist, he sees the limits of human perception, animals see things we can’t, so he believes there’s more energy and purpose out there.
Theo Von agreed, saying he tries to position himself as the best “receptor” for ideas and signals from above.
Jesus said: “Split wood, I am there. Lift up the stone, and you will find me there.” (Gospel of Thomas)
A candid talk about faith, science, and staying open.
Clint Eastwood on why other people's opinions don't matter:
Clint is asked whether he worries more now, or less, about what other people think of him as a person.
He says:
"I don't really worry too much about that. People have to think what they think. You can't go out and sell some image to them. That would be false to begin with."
He continues:
"So you just go ahead and do your work and people will form an opinion about you, good, bad or otherwise. It's up to them. It's not anything you can control anyway. So why bother with it? Why worry about it?"
Then he lays out the only standard worth measuring yourself against:
"If you live your life and you try to do as well as you can for your community, and be helpful, and do the best work you can, be the best mate or parent you can, then that's the best you."
Wesley Huff’s course: The Historical Reliability of the Bible, is available now.
In this course, @WesleyLHuff guides us through the historical foundations of Scripture. Together, we examine the evidence for the Bible's reliability from the formation of the biblical canon to the textual history of the Old and New Testaments, as well as the archaeological discoveries that illuminate the biblical world.
Along the way, Huff explains how the early church recognized the New Testament canon, traces the history of English Bible translation, and concludes by evaluating historical Jesus studies, showing how the cumulative historical evidence supports the Gospels as reliable eyewitness accounts of Jesus.