@SiezerW@emmywayne64@welovesweetboy_@Mamiwatar@paloma_datgirl Or the truest emodiment of balance, creation and destruction tempered and combined within a human soul. Their long battle resolved not through dominence or eliminating each other, but combining into something greater
@BENichs_Phoenix@ArlingtonDupe_@gncgalactus Honestly, if you told me she accepted his proposal to lock down a master waterbender to protect the south, I'd believe it. Gran gran gets shit done.
@bescalercio Honestly i liked it conceptually, i think choosing to be a meister despite having weapon potential fits her as a character. (Especially since we know weapons CAN wield each other). And we know that weapons DO have bloodlines. I just think the execution could have been far better.
@belikegift6 Watsonian answer: Gon gave away the future of that power to fight pitou, and the resolve that gave him that power is part of who he is. You cant "cure" his oath to himself. Doylist answer: gons story is done for now but if he still had his powers we'd constantly want details
@ArbiterOfFates@aetiphiaaa Pretty sure its a list. The brave one, us. The broken one, march as a fragment of fuli. The traitor, dan heng (because of his past life)
@autisticadhdco My phone has not been off silent in like 10 years. If i google the number and its a doctor or dentist ill listen to the voicemail in case i forgot an appointment.
Every time someone says "___ would be fine, people could just sue if they got hurt" i remember that a judge ruled there was no reasonable expectation that boneless wings wouldnt have bones.
I believed that if you were a good, hard worker that you would end up ahead in the end. That being honest was the best policy. And for mood whiplash, I also was afraid to spit in the toilet because I thought the water cycle meant it would go back in my mouth while I slept.
As good as the internet has been for me, I do think it has, in the broadest possible terms, destroyed society. Not in a post apocalyptic sense, but in the community sense. Somehow being more connected made everyone more individualistic until basic social contracts fell apart
It says something about our society that it's acceptable to question which people "deserve" the help they need to live, but basically forbidden to question why anyone deserves to make 300x profit margins on lifesaving medications. Or anything. No one "deserves" obscene profits