@ben_j_todd You do warn about that when you talk about AI development in section 2.2, but not in the context of any of the other instances, which made me wonder what you stance on that is.
@ben_j_todd That's something you're at least cautioning against elsewhere - so why not here? Is it that giving a few hundred dollars per year or even helping construct a data center is just a smaller contribution than directly working on AGI? Or something else?
@JeanClaudeFox2 My impression is that the originality is mostly within the paradigm, in the original Kuhnean sense. Sure, saying that whales are mammals won't get you into Nature, but neither will saying they're fish.
@JeanClaudeFox2 I think it was quite clear to start with, but my reply wasn't. My point was that the vast majority of academic papers will still be riffs on specific aspects of Mill's liberalism rather than on his authoritarianism, won't they?
@JeanClaudeFox2@StefanFSchubert They do, but I don't find the name particularly problematic (and would need to think for a while to come up with a better one)
@JeanClaudeFox2@StefanFSchubert I know what you mean. I had the feeling this was primarily in brief news items, and that alternative wordings like "Russo-Ukraine war" might be equally strange. But when I went to Spiegel Online to check, I struggled to find examples of those "performative" phrases...
@haugejostein "Fight bumbers" is really... well, something. Should be "right numbers", of course, and I do still think the numbers I quote (from the annual statements) are the relevant ones.
@haugejostein Those are not the fight bumbers. Just to take the first one: Elsevier did make about 3B£ in operating profits in 2023, but it was across its business. The database, research & academic publishing branch made ca. 1.1B£ in profits - not sure how much of it was for peer review.
@haugejostein Those are not the fight bumbers. Just to take the first one: Elsevier did make about 3B£ in operating profits in 2023, but it was across its business. The database, research & academic publishing branch made ca. 1.1B£ in profits - not sure how much of it was for peer review.
@PowerAbuses@intellectronica@StefanFSchubert My feeling is that defunding the police is seen by proponents not as the goal (once we don't need it anyway), but part of the solution. On fossil fuels, too, the phasing out can be an active component of the proposed path forward.
@intellectronica@StefanFSchubert I'm not an expert on the movement, but, whichever it is, I assume that most people who use it mean the defunding to be just part of the solution, not all of it.
@intellectronica@StefanFSchubert Just to add that I think the first part of the quoted tweet does make absolute sense - abolishing prisons/defunding police is the headline measure, not all there is meant to be. Not sure "literal interpretation" is a helpful tool here.
@intellectronica@StefanFSchubert I think the difference may be between proposing an action vs. a goal. "Defund the police" seems to be the former, "I want a world where nobody is poor" is clearly the latter. Yes, there's much room for motte & bailey, but such statements are hardly ever meant to be exhaustive.
@StefanFSchubert Sounds great. Will be interesting to see whether it can be finished on time and on budget - many if not most major infrastructure projects in GER over the last decades had horrendous delays & cost overruns...