Focusing on small planets, asteroids, comets, dust and the future of robotic & human exploration. All opinions are personal and not those of @planetarysci
I will be turning into a mild-mannered Senior Scientist at the end of 2025! Looking forward to more research, more music, and more visits to grandsons! See the announcement at https://t.co/0WmKcXxtxq
@planetarysci@Nature@NASANewHorizons@dr_hendrix The problem is not that it is doing great heliophysics and astrophysics, but that NASA plans to shut down further planetary exploration from the Kuiper Belt by NH.
EDITORIAL: CONGRESS NEEDS TO INTERVENE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NASA PLANETARY SCIENCE
https://t.co/rChMXkMmWD
Talk to your congressional offices. It is crazy to damage well managed programs to support programs in trouble.
Seminar Dec 1, 11AM Arizona. Startlingly beautiful JunoCam images of Jupiter with physical insights and discussion by Candy Hansen (Juno Co-I), Jonathan Lilly (physical oceanographer), and others. Will be fun! https://t.co/9P46KliH5E
#DPS2021 agency night. NASA PSD presentation. Q: Why was XRP selections only 12%? A: Because proposals submitted increased more than 50%. Math: 2021 props were 171, 2021 props were 153. 171/153~1.12. NASA fails.
@NASA The presentation and discussion is now posted on the PSI YouTube channel https://t.co/NqqMQFRcsY and my YouTube channel https://t.co/Dd4AC9T7mG since Roger added me to the mix.
Join our PSI Seminar, Wed Sept 22, 11AM Pacific
Roger Clark will lead a discussion on "The Consequences of Declining Support for @NASA Planetary Mission Science"
https://t.co/EAmAxrN8Xy
Meeting ID: 817 2219 1257
Passcode: 520823
Reprising my 9/8 talk at UA LPL today. New: Different means of using NASA planetary R&A programs as a slush fund, with examples. The perfect inversion of decadal priorities. Why? Other impacted programs.
(THREAD) I will be giving a seminar at PSI at 11 AM Pacific, Wednesday, Sept 8 on
PLANETARY R&A AND DECADAL DISCUSSION
https://t.co/Lu3xvxVxDE
Meeting ID: 314 726 0599
Passcode: SYNOPSIS
(1/4)
What should be the Decadal funding recommendation for R&A?
Do we have to choose between R&A and missions?
How do we ensure NASA compliance with R&A funding levels recommended by the Decadal Survey?
Why are these programs important to the US planetary science community?
(3/4)