psyko.

• 26
• dumb bitch
• eats grass on a regular basis
• i want friends
• dont look at me, but please touch me
• ❗18+❗

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

Starting today it's illegal to insult public servants (cops, teachers, social service workers, etc.) in Sweden, so I just wanna make it really clear for the record:
I LOVE SWEDISH COPS, I THINK THEY'RE GREAT PEOPLE WITH THICK SKIN. THEY'RE DEFINITELY NOT PUSSIES AT ALL WHATSOEVER

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@Gorgeous1y3t @tylerwestside @carrtmannn No, he also has an interest in getting the videos taken down. That's not an admission of guilt at all.

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

This is a lie.

When pxie filed a motion to compel Lolcow LLC to take the videos down it was destiny who filed a motion in opposition.

https://t.co/P40zkQVJF0

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@mravocadoman101 @frisk2700 I literally said he violated destiny's consent.

But no, since solo wasn't in contact with/had any personal responsibility towards the women I don't hold him as responsible for violating *their* consent as I do destiny, but obviously he holds all the blame for it becoming public.

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@thelaffingman12 I'm not, destiny is blaming his victim.

Have you seen any evidence that he has a case open at all, or are you taking a known liars word for it?

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@Gorgeous1y3t @tylerwestside @carrtmannn She wants her lawyers to be compensated for doing extra work on someone else's behalf, that's not weird or wrong.

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@tylerwestside @Gorgeous1y3t @carrtmannn Correct!!

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@frisk2700 @mravocadoman101 Solo and KF aren't the ones who violated her consent. That's destiny, and only destiny.
Then solo went on to violate destiny's privacy, but the initial violation was that of destiny sending sex tapes around without consent.

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@low81505851 @XJovonnX5 No, he said pxie "blocked" him from getting it taken down, which is a lie. She was the one taking the initiative to get the video taken down.

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@denaltb @bmwisswell @nebraskaryan69 @officernasty70 is a total loser and a lobotomized jstlk gimp, absolutely.

But what does that make you??? 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@mravocadoman101 The counsel for KF said they'd take it down *pursuant to a court order*, dumbass.

I haven't seen a reply like that from Brettler, but I also haven't read the documents in a while

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@mikalminors_ai @grok No, that's literally what I've been saying lmao

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@mravocadoman101 Brother, I'm addressing a lie destiny told YESTERDAY.

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@carrtmannn And plaintiff said she'd add them into the motion if the defense paid the additional attorneys fees that would incur, but that never happened.

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@decollacarmine It didn't. Doe and KF came to a stipulation that KF would take the video down pursuant to an order (that as far as I can see never happened?)

I'm not sure what happened with that, but I think KF decided to make the videos available to members only before the judge ruled on it.

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@Legit_Merk_ No, Doe was gonna file a motion to compel the video of her be removed, and told destiny that if he wanted to have the links to the other videos included in the motion he'd have to pay the additional attorneys fees that would incur. That's very fair.

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@morcell0 That's really kind of you!!

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

That's not even a good version of the picture, here's one in higher resolution for you to... post at me?? I guess???

Why you think I'd be mad about someone posting my favorite picture of me in my replies is beyond me tbh

[morcell @morcell0]

@psykodynamic @TruthWizardLive Says the ugly freak

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@officernasty70 North literally can't complain about snarkers or even KF revealing his name since the first person to post it WAS FUCKING OWLISH 😭😭😭😭😭

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@tylerwestside @thesoypill Destiny mad bc soypill more attractive and get more puspus. Tale as old as time.

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@Flokator4All :)

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

Additionally, it would make sense she'd only ask to have the video of her taken down, as she doesn't have standing to get the other videos taken down since they don't include her.

[psyko. @psykodynamic]

@LouisC55111 If the judge is limited in what she can compel a third party to do that'll be her decision, there's no need to file a motion opposing.

Doesn't matter if he's a victim now, he sent the vid to Rose without pxies consent and that's where *her* victimization is.